Does post count matter


Does post count matter  

227 members have voted

  1. 1. Does post count matter

    • yes
      86
    • no
      141


Recommended Posts

I don't judge people on their postcount, however I feel a lot of members here do. I judge on the grammar and punctuation of the post as well as its relation to the topic, as this gives a much better measure of the quality of the member in question.

<<snipped>>...no personal attacks

i dont care about postcount. i care about my subbadge and helping fellow neowinians with their problems. and this stupid poll just causes alot of geekfights and unnecessary discussions.

585867041[/snapback]

agreed, it is what you are posting about and what is in the post, not how many of them you have. ;)

This poll is actually misleading.  Matter in terms of what?  Respect?  Shoe size?  Ability to play Doom 3?

585867390[/snapback]

matter in any way other than statistics.

ie reputation, respect, beleivability, amount of an a$$ someone is, etc.

Hell no. But how did this thread hit 4 pages? Post padding again?

It doesn't effect anything but I think it is nice to set a goal (1000 in 1 year) and try to meet it.

You know what, that's not a bad goal. I think I'll try for that one. But it's complex. It involves posting and sticking around long enough (not getting banned) to accomplish it. :whistle:

Stupid question, stupid answer, NO it doesn't. The mere fact you are asking this implies that you do. No offence.

585866670[/snapback]

He opened the poll because he mentioned that post count doesn't matter in Site & Form Issues, and one or two of the mods took issue with his saying that many people don't care. So he opened a poll to see whether he was right.

People SAY that postcount doesn't matter but the stink would be incredible if we ever talked about hiding it or removing their stars.  We had a rush of new subscribers after we found a way to give them a subscriber badge while keeping their stars.  People love their stars.

585866740[/snapback]

I would be fine if we hid/removed post count.

id say in some ways yes it matters...if you see someone with 2 posts making an outlandish claim...it would be hard to believe...but someone with 20000 posts makes one...it may be worth looking into...because if they havent been banned after that many posts, they must at least show a little quality :)

585866803[/snapback]

Not really, because people don't get banned for spamming. There are hundreds of posters whose post count is made up mostly of one word posts like "ok", "lol", "good one", "interesting", "thanks", etc.

Not really, because people don't get banned for spamming. There are hundreds of posters whose post count is made up mostly of one word posts like "ok", "lol", "good one", "interesting", "thanks", etc.

585867726[/snapback]

They can be. They can, and certainly have in the past, received warnings.

I've been on this board, for a very long time, and stick by a maxim to only say something unique, original, and helpful. Forums are not like actual conversation where you can gloss over certain needless points, but a large glut of posts can not only disguise an important topic but sometimes drive important topics out of existence.

So - post when you have something important to say - no more, no less.

I've seen you get a grilling that you spam, it must be a little annoying when you do genuinely help people in the hardware section alot.

I personally would say that I have a low percentage of spam posts, and always try to help where I can. So in my case, my post count does matter, because I've tried to contribute to the community, and not just tard it up.

Some people all they do is "Lol" or "congrats" all day. They may as well not even bother. It's not like anyone actually knows them.

585866712[/snapback]

Exactly.

People SAY that postcount doesn't matter but the stink would be incredible if we ever talked about hiding it or removing their stars.  We had a rush of new subscribers after we found a way to give them a subscriber badge while keeping their stars.  People love their stars.

585866740[/snapback]

Bingo. If the poll was "should the post count/stars be removed", you'd see a landslide in favor of 'no'.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!