• 0

minimising outlook express using no tray programs


Question

14 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

KO, what OS are you running?

in Xp you can do it through registry,

HKEY_CURRENT_USER Software Microsoft Office 10.0 Outlook Preferences

Data Type: REG_DWORD

Value Name: MinToTray

Data: 1 (0 to disable MinToTray)

i am still trying to figure out how to do it in 2k, not sure how yet though...so if anyone knows...(i run 2k at work.. where i do have outlook always open....)

  • 0

I noticed you asked for anything BUT minimize-to-tray progs, but seemed happy with the Powermenu tip.

So here we go:

In my opinion TrayIt! is far better!

Free, no install neccessary, configurable and it works with any window/program. You can choose to only minimize Outlook Express to tray, and it will go to Tray when you click the minimize button in the main window.

No fiddling with Task Bar entries required (like with Powermenu).

You can set up Outlook Express to check for new emails every two minutes, minimize it to Tray, and you will see the New Email icon in the Tray when you recieve new mail.

Here is what it looks like when using Outlook Express:

newmail.jpg

This is the New Mail icon next to the Outlook Express minimized window icon.

(ps. trayit beats the crap out of all the other tray apps! try it and you will see. You cannot do a regedit trick with Outlook Express, so why not have a prog loaded that minimizes any window you want to tray, or simply by right-clicking the close button?)

  • 0

i want to know the registry trick for win 2k, because i use microsoft outlook and tray it right now, but everytime i open a message (new mail or compose a new letter) after i send or close it, there is still an icon for it in my tray... i have to double click on it, and it opens a blanck message with the subject of the recently closed message.. then close it.. it just gets annoying, and i am sure it has to do with a glitch in tray it... other than that specific program error, however, i agree that tray it is a great program

  • 0

mick0142:

Hmmm, never had that problem...

Are you sure you are using the original Tray It! ? >link here<

Screenshot:

trayit.jpg

And not the crappy ripoff version of TrayIt? >link here<

Screenshot:

im1.JPG

The ripoff version is very buggy, and should be avoided!

Also see this thread.

  • 0

Minimizing Outlook express to the tray is basicly pointless, might as well just be in the taskbar. If minimized to tray, you end up with 2 icons whenever you have mail (the minimized OE and the new mail notify) which just looks crappy.

This is one of the main reasons I've always hated IE/OE. I miss so many emails cuz I rarely start Outlook Express manually.

At least Netscape had it right, I never missed an email when I was using it.

  • 0

To minimize Outlook 2002 to the system tray, start regedit and follow the steps below:

Navigate to:

HKEY_CURRENT_USER/Software/Microsoft/Office/10.0/Outlook/Preferences

Right click and select New>DWORD Value

Where it says New Value #1 type MinToTray

Now double click on it and where it says Value Data type 1

Hope This Helps

  • 0

Hope this helps: https://www.neowin.net/bboard/showthread.ph...ay&pagenumber=2

I use RBTray... haven't found anything that does the job as easily and simply, allied with Ziff Davis' TrayManager to tidy up all those icons on my win 2000 machine.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      561
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!