Recommended Posts

Last I checked your comment was about how messing about with system files isn't likely to do anybody any harm which is a load of crap. He might not be doing brain surgery but he could be using his machine to make money - an easily avoidable screw-up caused by his own negligence can cost him his job or damage his company.

585886831[/snapback]

I was commenting to someone who said you shouldn't mess with system files because it might do harm to your system.

This thread is about someone who tries to mod his own personal system. I wasn't saying at all that it won't do any harm when a whole corporation is involved, which is not the case here. So wtf are you talking about?

If it's your own personal system you like to mess with, who cares?

How much does all this screwing around take? 20 minutes? An hour? 3 hours?

How much is the data on the computer worth?

What are the costs of not being able to meet a deadline because he was trying to delete a system file?

585886831[/snapback]

I would never try doing things like this on one of the servers I have setup, but on my personal computer it is well worth the risk to make things the way I like them and to speed things up, even if it is just a little. I do a pretty good job backing things up, and am much more likely to loose data due to hardware failure then screwing with system files.

I realize that this sort of modification is not for everybody, but I enjoy seeing what I can do with my system and I know that there are at least a few others on this board who feel the same way.

And where exactly does apple keep many of their vital system files? It's not in the system folder is it?

I dont want to try this now, but I am guessing that you can delete almost every file from /System/Library except for /System/Library/CoreServices/BootX and System and still boot into single user mode.

that's kinda dumb how it's pretty much impossible to disable it, it's like windows and not being able to get rid of IE or Windows Media Player

585886858[/snapback]

Because it's considered a feature and not an application. To Apple, it's on the same level as Expos?. Do you want to remove Expos? from your system? Would you ever have to? No, because it's a feature.

By the way, quitting every widget in Dashboard does just about the same thing as not letting Dashboard load at all. The Dashboard server uses barely any resources. It's the widgets that take up memory and, when loaded, CPU.

By the way, quitting every widget in Dashboard does just about the same thing as not letting Dashboard load at all. The Dashboard server uses barely any resources. It's the widgets that take up memory and, when loaded, CPU.

585894575[/snapback]

Which is exactly what I said earlier. Quit all the widgets, turn off the hot key for Dashboard in System Preferences, and you have effectively disabled it.

Which is exactly what I said earlier.  Quit all the widgets, turn off the hot key for Dashboard in System Preferences, and you have effectively disabled it.

585894585[/snapback]

Agreed. Once Dashboard starts getting some organizing features (like Lock to Grid, as someone previously mentioned) and some better looking widgets, I'll be a lot more interested in it.

Agreed.  Once Dashboard starts getting some organizing features (like Lock to Grid, as someone previously mentioned) and some better looking widgets, I'll be a lot more interested in it.

585896193[/snapback]

I actually LIKE the fact that widgets don't "lock to grid" because sometimes I want them exactly where I put them, not where some artificial grid tells me they can be (this is one thing that annoys the hell out of me about the desktop in OS X). As for "better looking widgets", have you looked at some of the new stuff available at Apple's site or the Dashboard Widget site?

I actually LIKE the fact that widgets don't "lock to grid" because sometimes I want them exactly where I put them, not where some artificial grid tells me they can be (this is one thing that annoys the hell out of me about the desktop in OS X).  As for "better looking widgets", have you looked at some of the new stuff available at Apple's site or the Dashboard Widget site?

585896407[/snapback]

They can easily make a preference of it. You can lock them to grid, or don't. Just like Finder icons.

And I'm really anything but impressed with the 3rd party widgets that are available on the Apple site right now, same goes for the Dashboarder. The only ones I like so far are those Mini game widgets from VanillaSoap.

Once again, I really really want the ability to somewhat organize the whole thing. It's just too messy for me right now. :pinch:

I actually LIKE the fact that widgets don't "lock to grid" because sometimes I want them exactly where I put them, not where some artificial grid tells me they can be (this is one thing that annoys the hell out of me about the desktop in OS X).? As for "better looking widgets", have you looked at some of the new stuff available at Apple's site or the Dashboard Widget site?

585896407[/snapback]

It's a preference for the Finder, what makes you think Apple wouldn't do the same for Dashboard?

And yes, I have found plenty of widgets, none of them look very refined, clean, minimal, etc.

What I meant about the desktop is that you can't (easily) configure the size of the grid; I know you can turn it off. I would imagine this would be the same if they implemented it in Dashboard. Is it so hard to line the widgets up where you want them when you place them on the Dashboard?

What I meant about the desktop is that you can't (easily) configure the size of the grid; I know you can turn it off.? I would imagine this would be the same if they implemented it in Dashboard.? Is it so hard to line the widgets up where you want them when you place them on the Dashboard?

585896876[/snapback]

Yes it is, very hard. I just want them to stick on one side of the screen or something. Just some way to organize it properly (3rd time), like the Dock, Finder icon location options, scalability etc. Make them behave more like icons when it comes to that.

Edited by PureLogic
Yes it is, very hard. I just want them to stick on one side of the screen or something. Just some way to organize it properly (3rd time), like the Dock, Finder icon location options, scalability etc. Make them behave more like icons when it comes to that.

585896944[/snapback]

That might be difficult or impossible given the freeform nature of Widgets. They can be an size or shape. Even though it doesn't seem like it, icons are all square, so it's easier to force them to certain locations. Personally, I wish that you could selectively size individual icons on the desktop instead of all of them being the same size.

Dragging the dashboard icon off of the dock seemed to remove it from the dock for good.

I like dashboard, and I'm probably the only one who likes the fact that it is in a "separate screen." If all those widgets were on my desktop, it would be too clutter.

My only real complaint about dashboard so far is: there is no spell checking options on notes or when you are looking up a word in the dictionary/thesaurus. And the dictionary doesn't pick up misspelled words very well either.

Apple should have provided a way to turn Dashboard off, IMO. If people want to conserve resources let them. For some reason that seems counter-intuitive for Apple.

"Ok gang, in this next release, lets see if we can make 512MB of ram completely obsolete!"

-Steve Jobs

That might be difficult or impossible given the freeform nature of Widgets.  They can be an size or shape.  Even though it doesn't seem like it, icons are all square, so it's easier to force them to certain locations.  Personally, I wish that you could selectively size individual icons on the desktop instead of all of them being the same size.

585896983[/snapback]

Well it shouldn't be too difficult to make widgets scalable.

Apple should have provided a way to turn Dashboard off, IMO.  If people want to conserve resources let them.  For some reason that seems counter-intuitive for Apple. 

585897056[/snapback]

If you remove all the widgets from your Dashboard and turn off the hot key for Dashboard it uses no more resources than the Dock(which it is part of) would anyway.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Umm, read my answer again! If you have something to add or contribute, feel free. Otherwise my point was that you apparently dont want faster updates... so you want slower updates by process of elimination. If you have something to contribute, meaningful answers are better.
    • These features described above are good, but far from what developers will like the most. The main feature that developers will care and love the most it's called "Bring Your Own Models". It gives us the ability to connect to LOCAL AI models running on Ollama. The feature it's located on GitHub Copilot tab -> On the model picker where you can select "manage models" instead of paid models and then it will show you the "Bring your own models" window where you can now select Ollama and the endpoint of your local server. So if you have a beefy spec machine you can now use your own model 100% local inside Visual Studio 2026 18.7.0
    • Microsoft Teams is getting a controversial location tracking feature that users may hate by Usama Jawad Image generated with Microsoft Copilot Earlier this year, Microsoft planned to roll out a controversial location tracking feature in Teams, but following customer feedback, it decided to delay its release. The bad news is that the company has decided to launch it later this year, but it's based on roughly the same design that was shared earlier, which means that many users still have good reason to worry. Basically, Microsoft Places and Teams have received workplace check-ins via Wi-Fi. The idea is that if an employee arrives at the office and connects to their enterprise network, their profile status indicator will show them as being present in the office. For example, if you arrive at work, open Teams on your PC, and connect to the "Studio B" company Wi-Fi network, your Teams profile will indicate that you are present in "Studio B", as shown below: Microsoft says that this feature is basically a replacement for physical workplace check-in peripherals, it reduces the need to manually update your status, and it also enables co-workers to know that you're at work so that they can coordinate in-person meetings with you. IT admins can enable this workplace check-in capability at a tenant level, and users have the ability to control whether they want to enable it or not. Of course, all of that sounds great on paper, but naturally, many Teams customers may still have concerns, as they did before. This is because it enables your reporting manager and other members of the organization to track if you are at the office, when you arrive at the office, and where you are right now. This could be problematic for people who work in what they consider to be flexible work environments or hybrid setups, and this kind of location tracking could be considered an invasion of privacy. Microsoft has tried to alleviate some of these concerns by letting users know that they can manually set their location easily, which essentially overrides workplace check-in if they feel uncomfortable with it. However, that doesn't really solve the problem because your organization could enforce a workplace policy that mandates that this feature remains enabled. The Redmond tech giant has also assured users that this capability does not store historical data and is only a real-time indicator of location. Finally, it only generates a signal when you connect to a corporate network, which means that if you are working from home and connect your PC to your personal Wi-Fi, it won't broadcast your location to your employer; you will simply be shown as "Remote". Microsoft has encouraged IT admins to prepare for this change and begin informing users so they know what to expect once it begins rolling out later this year.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      AndrewSteel earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Veteran
      Taliseian went up a rank
      Veteran
    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      82
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!