Recommended Posts

It's no different than Microsoft copying from Apple. Mac users have been calling it for years, and all people say is "Oh, stop your whining." How about Opera users just do the same thing and stop the whining. It's not like it's going to lead to any justice being done.

Firefox become like Opera?

Nah, Firefox is actually good.

585890603[/snapback]

Ya when its ( FF ) finally loaded after going and getting a beer.

I would use IE before FF, I have been sprung on Opera's speed, stability and functionality for a long time. ( Got me away from FF , and the new FF's are just getting worse )

And whomever said the FF / Moz guys invented mosaic. Thats not even remotely correct, it was developed at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. FAR FAR before moz/fox was even thought of.

Looks like FF turns its users into trolls with dilusions of grandeur now to0.

The ONLY reason Opera isnt more popular, is because it isnt free.

It's no different than Microsoft copying from Apple. Mac users have been calling it for years, and all people say is "Oh, stop your whining." How about Opera users just do the same thing and stop the whining. It's not like it's going to lead to any justice being done.

It's not about Mozilla copying Opera. It's about Mozilla copying Opera(or others), reinventing the wheel and boasting that's THE MOZILLA INNOVATION AND INVENTION.

Im a web developer. Opera is a royal pain to work with.

well, describe some problems if you dare. Or just STFU if you can't name any and are spreading FUD.

Even if Opera and Firefox have the same features, Firefox is the only one of the two that does them correctly, every time. I purchased Opera 8.0 on the day of release, that thing is ****ty to say the least.

-More unexplained rendering errors.

-Gmail will load, but it isn't displayed.

-Random crashing.

-Slowing browsing, so much for being the fastest browser.

Firefox > Opera

I tried to get opera looking like firefox, because my firefox folders are filled with spy/adware and crap, infact, my whole pc is filled with it and it all comes in through firefox!

anyway,

Opera: hard to get used to and it has far to many features

Firefox: great to use, my favourite, but sadly i find it MUCH less secure....

as for opera turning into firefox.... I hope it does! Firefox with opera security... that would be meaty

Im a web developer. Opera is a royal pain to work with.

You know what? That's funny because I, too, am a web developer and coder and I can say that Opera is equally great with Firefox in terms of displaying, just that Opera draws faster. Don't know what you're talking about. :huh:

There are just two problems with Opera :

1. Stop making it a suite of applications or make both - Opera suite and Opera standard

2. The GUI... too complicated (they are working on it, I know), the banner (that's a tough one to deal with for them...) and those buttons who turns yellow... they're actually quite ugly. I feel bad to say that though because it's a nice effect. The layout is nice though, but windows xp standard would be better. They should just use the standard windows XP GUI. The only applications that I know of and that are nice with non-windows GUI are Windows Media Player 8+ and Winamp5.

Even if Opera and Firefox have the same features, Firefox is the only one of the two that does them correctly, every time. I purchased Opera 8.0 on the day of release, that thing is ****ty to say the least.

-More unexplained rendering errors.

-Gmail will load, but it isn't displayed.

-Random crashing.

-Slowing browsing, so much for being the fastest browser.

Firefox > Opera

585891522[/snapback]

Ya the weird rendering sometimes occurs. I get it too, but that happens in FF as well.

Gmail loads fine for me and works fine. Try clearing cache?

Random crashing. Ya, it is weird, I don't know why it happens, but the auto load previously opened windows helps a lot. Compared to FF, when FF crashes, and it does..I have to reopen the websites manually =\.

Opera doesn't seem to be a slow browser. Infact, on my computer, it is definitely faster than FF.

The Biggest Two Reasons people choose FireFox over Opera is because

1. Its free (open source)

2. Its Much more customizeable than Opera will ever be

You have User.js Chrome you have extentions. Not everyone uses RSS and i don't think its neccessary personally however if i really wanted it i could of installed an extention that would allow me to use. Thus making Firefox more customizable.

To change one thing in opera is close to impossible for example i couldnt even install a simply plugin. But with mozilla the switch to it was easy.

I wouldn't say Opera sucks for my dad uses opera and i use firefox.

Please dont call me a troll for i use both, and IMO firefox better.

Back to Topic. It doesn't matter who invented this or came up with the idea. Its like saying Bill gates made the first computer why are other companies making them?

Kind of stupid.

The Biggest Two Reasons people choose FireFox over Opera is because

1. Its free (open source)

2. Its Much more customizeable than Opera will ever be

You have User.js Chrome you have extentions. Not everyone uses RSS and i don't think its neccessary personally however if i really wanted it i could of installed an extention that would allow me to use. Thus making Firefox more customizable.

To change one thing in opera is close to impossible for example i couldnt even install a simply plugin. But with mozilla the switch to it was easy.

I wouldn't say Opera sucks for my dad uses opera and i use firefox.

Please dont call me a troll for i use both, and IMO firefox better.

Back to Topic. It doesn't matter who invented this or came up with the idea. Its like saying Bill gates made the first computer why are other companies making them?

Kind of stupid.

585891582[/snapback]

What simple plugins can't you install on Opera?

If they install and work on Firefox just copy the dll's over the the Opera Plugins folder, they will more then likely work.

I use to be an avid IE user, but got sick of having to run spyware cleaners after every session, Firefox for me personally does cut tons of this out, and Opera... simply have no need to pay out cash for something if Firefox does the job fine, I may consider grabbing a pirate copy of Opera to try it out in all it's glory first, but no way i'm forking out money to find I want to stick with Firefox anyhow.... and the BS propaganda people have been whining about, I have never even paid attention to it, I simply tried Firefox for myself and prefered, quality is in the product itself.

Opera loses tons of marks simply because it isn't free, and that's before I have even used it.

I use to be an avid IE user, but got sick of having to run spyware cleaners after every session, Firefox for me personally does cut tons of this out, and Opera... simply have no need to pay out cash for something if Firefox does the job fine, I may consider grabbing a pirate copy of Opera to try it out in all it's glory first, but no way i'm forking out money to find I want to stick with Firefox anyhow.... and the BS propaganda people have been whining about, I have never even paid attention to it, I simply tried Firefox for myself and prefered, quality is in the product itself.

Opera loses tons of marks simply because it isn't free, and that's before I have even used it.

585891617[/snapback]

Instead of warezing it, have a look Here

Show the world that you use Opera. Put one of these banners or buttons on your Web page.

As an appreciation of your efforts, you will receive a registration code for Opera 8 automatically once 250 unique referrals from your site have been logged.

That's what i did - i'm now a valid Opera customer, all you need to do is get 250 people to click on a link, proxy's work too :whistle:

You know what? That's funny because I, too, am a web developer and coder and I can say that Opera is equally great with Firefox in terms of displaying, just that Opera draws faster. Don't know what you're talking about.  :huh:

There are just two problems with Opera :

1. Stop making it a suite of applications or make both - Opera suite and Opera standard

2. The GUI... too complicated (they are working on it, I know), the banner (that's a tough one to deal with for them...) and those buttons who turns yellow... they're actually quite ugly. I feel bad to say that though because it's a nice effect. The layout is nice though, but windows xp standard would be better. They should just use the standard windows XP GUI. The only applications that I know of and that are nice with non-windows GUI are Windows Media Player 8+ and Winamp5.

585891538[/snapback]

1. Making versions for separate audiences would be pointless. Mail, RSS, and IRC altogether is around 100kb. Not only that but those options are disabled by default until you want to use them. No benefit besides 100kb less to download and more confusion from normal users.

2. The user interface is somewhat over-complicated at places, but they are working on it. While I also think that the Windows theme is great on XP, you have to remember that Opera would be butt-ugly in other Windows versions.

I can't understand how Opera can cause more problems for web developers than Firefox; last time I checked Opera was the most standards-compliant browser.

585891678[/snapback]

In regards to commonly-used lanuages like CSS and XHTML in the Windows world, Opera is better, in my experience.

CSS positioning is bad in Opera, infact, i would say that IE is better than Opera for rendering.

585891721[/snapback]

Could you post some links to these positioning problems?

I've used positioning, floating, and :hover together multiple times and I have never come across any rendering bugs. With only CSS I am able to create multi-level dropdown menu systems which are relatively positioned and floated to make the menus stack on-top of their containers (covering 2px of the right side of the parent menu) and also show arrows to the right of the menu-item text by floating generated content which has a background of an arrow image. I can do all of that without encountering bugs so I doubt that you have found any bugs in positioning, if you really have then I'll submit a bug report.

Very true, but when I do a clean install of Opera it takes like 7-10 min to get it the way I like it. It's very visually bloated on first start up. On the contrary FF takes me aprox 1 min to get it the way I like it from a clean install and thats including extension downloads and configurations.

585890654[/snapback]

That's funny...it's the exact opposite for me. In Firefox, I have to search for all the extensions I had (and REdownload them; they're not kept in a zip somewhere for transfering them). Also, compatibility between versions is poor, especially when an extension you use doesn't really get updated; this goes for themes, too.

But with Opera, it's just a matter of copying a few lines from my toolbar INI file, and importing bookmarks. And most Opera 7 skins work pretty good with Opera 8.

Firefox invented mosaic a while back

Firefox is a browser. Mosaic was a browser, and it was around ages before Firefox. Opera was around back when Mosaic was around, too.

Anyway, looks like Firefox is gaining more features and bloat in 1.1, 1.5 and 2.0...

i really love the "find as you go" feature in firefox and opera ( http://tntluoma.com/opera/lover/6/day13-inlinefind/ ) but why didn't he clarify who did it first?

Opera did, of course ;)

Very true, but when I do a clean install of Opera it takes like 7-10 min to get it the way I like it. It's very visually bloated on first start up. On the contrary FF takes me aprox 1 min to get it the way I like it from a clean install and thats including extension downloads and configurations.

Did you even bother to try Opera 8 before posting about it?

There are just two problems with Opera :

1. Stop making it a suite of applications or make both - Opera suite and Opera standard

Totally, completely, and utterly pointless. The mail client and other stuff is hidden until you create an account, so the point is moot.

2. The GUI... too complicated

Too complicated? Opera has a couple of more buttons than Firefox visible, and fewer top level menus! That's not "too complicated", unless you think Firefox is complicated.

The thread topic is a bit funny, looking at Firefox's recent additions of the Opera-style fast back/forward and the SVG support.

So I guess it works in both ways. Maybe one day they'll merge into a true IE Killer, marketed by Google with the name... Gbrowser!

heh

Anyway, re Opera's "complicated UI", I think that's mostly a bad rumor it got from the 7.x versions. The current Opera 8 one is as simple as the Firefox UI to me. It's not a very bloated browser either; actually it has a smaller disk and memory footprint than Firefox.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft fixes one of Excel Copilot's most frustrating limitations by Usama Jawad Microsoft began integrating Copilot into Excel a couple of years ago and has been upgrading it with new functionalities since then. While some changes have been controversial, Microsoft is hoping to win over users by allowing them to be more productive via Copilot. To that end, it has now announced a Copilot improvement that may actually be appreciated by people who use it regularly. Excel customers often use the Copilot prompt box to issue instructions to format and customize their data, but it can become quite tiring to keep repeating the same instructions again and again. Microsoft now allows you to define Copilot personalization rules for formatting, naming conventions, formulas, and report styles. These can be accessed via Settings > Personalization, where you can explain your rules in natural language like "Always format currency in USD with no decimals", and just let Copilot take care of the rest. Microsoft is going a step further in this direction by allowing you to set workbook rules too. These rules are stored as a .Rules sheet, and are preserved while the workbook is shared. This fosters collaboration while making sure that standard rules govern the Copilot editing experience across the organization. Other advantages of this capability include pointing it to specific examples, defining dynamic formulas, and referencing an entire sheet and asking Copilot to infer rules based on that. You can leverage this feature by opening Copilot in Excel, clicking on "+", and selecting Create workbook rules. If you have an existing .Rules sheet, you can simply start listing the rules in column A as well. Personalization features are available to all Copilot in Excel users across the web, Mac, and Windows. Meanwhile, workbook rules are currently being previewed for Windows and Mac customers on the Insiders channel. General availability is scheduled after a few weeks, but a concrete date is currently unknown. Overall, the Excel capability is quite similar to ChatGPT's memory features, which allow you to permanently store items in the AI model's context window.
    • Imagine you still haven't discovered Total Commander that is doing all those things for three decades already...
    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!