Recommended Posts

ok im pretty sure from what ive read that you cant create a partition on an xp pc and put os x on it ...but i dont know why could some1 explain it. on that note can you have xp on one drive and os x another?

also are osx and linux compatible? if so can i fomat and install linux then have a xp partition and a os x one ?

...im not plannin on actually doin ne o this but only cause i only have a 40gb hdd ...the question has just been botherin me for a while

thnx pplz

-nomad311

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/318456-os-x-and-xp/
Share on other sites

Windows XP is written for processors with x86 architecture.

Apple OSX is written for processors with PowerPC architecture.

They are not compatible, ergo you cannot run Windows XP and OSX natively on the same machine.

This is not taking into account emulators such as PearPC, CherryOS, or VirtualPC.

If you have an Apple computer, you can install Virtual PC onto it, and then install a copy of Windows that runs in the 'vPC' you've created.

If you have an x86 computer (AMD or Intel processor) you can install PearPC, and then install a copy of Apple OSX into that.

Perhaps your best bet is to do some reading on processor architectures.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/318456-os-x-and-xp/#findComment-585896201
Share on other sites

Windows XP is written for processors with x86 architecture.

Apple OSX is written for processors with PowerPC architecture.

They are not compatible, ergo you cannot run Windows XP and OSX natively on the same machine.

This is not taking into account emulators such as PearPC, CherryOS, or VirtualPC.

If you have an Apple computer, you can install Virtual PC onto it, and then install a copy of Windows that runs in the 'vPC' you've created.

If you have an x86 computer (AMD or Intel processor) you can install PearPC, and then install a copy of Apple OSX into that.

Perhaps your best bet is to do some reading on processor architectures.

585896201[/snapback]

Or, you could buy a mac :D

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/318456-os-x-and-xp/#findComment-585896209
Share on other sites

koo thanks jack thats all i wanted to know

n yeh i know this question has been answered before but every post i found ...looked around for about 30 mins b4 i posted (couldnt make very good searches cause of the 4 letter thing) just talked about the emulation alternatives

thnx again

-nomad311

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/318456-os-x-and-xp/#findComment-585896234
Share on other sites

no i didnt have the answer ...i wanted to know why not how to get around the problem

thats like if i asked cant i breath under water and you answerd you can buy an oxygen tank...

but thnx again ppl

-nomad311

585900863[/snapback]

Didn't it occur to you that the reason that all of those posts talked about emulation options was because they use different hardware? And I'm quite certain that all of the posts I've seen here about it have mentioned the reason WHY you can't just install OS X on an x86 PC.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/318456-os-x-and-xp/#findComment-585900914
Share on other sites

PearPC would be what you are after (answer #209423989) but it will run "500 times slower than the host" -- That's a quote from the documentation. Its emulation. Its pretending to be hardware by using software translation. If you want a mac, buy a mac. If you want to emulate, just install your favorite Linux distrobution (or Unix/Darwin Unix) and build from there. There are themes for cursors/windows/etc. to emulate the Mac OS gui. But remember, under the hood its all Unix.

Linux - Your friendly neighborhood penguin.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/318456-os-x-and-xp/#findComment-585901049
Share on other sites

PearPC would be what you are after (answer #209423989) but it will run "500 times slower than the host" -- That's a quote from the documentation. Its emulation. Its pretending to be hardware by using software translation. If you want a mac, buy a mac. If you want to emulate, just install your favorite Linux distrobution (or Unix/Darwin Unix) and build from there. There are themes for cursors/windows/etc. to emulate the Mac OS gui. But remember, under the hood its all Unix.

Linux - Your friendly neighborhood penguin.

585901049[/snapback]

its ether 15 or 500 times slower depending on extentions on the cpu of the host

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/318456-os-x-and-xp/#findComment-585901067
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
    • Interesting read. I knew the adware was quite controversial at the time, however never realised to the point The Guardian wrote an article about Patchou. I just said no and enjoyed his creation, I’d probably be a lot more wary of something like that today though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!