Recommended Posts

OK, so I have a first generation iPod Mini. I have the newest update for it, so I've been testing the EQ settings. A friend of mine owns an MPIO, and his ear buds sound amazing with Base Booster selected. OK, so I selected it as well. Wow, sounds like total ****. The base sounds so bad that the music is very distorted. I ordered new ear buds - an obvious different from the distortion, but I still get very bad quality from higher bit rate MP3 which should have good base. I had my buddy try the iPod ear buds in his MPIO, and the base was absolutely nothing compared to the MPIO ear buds. MPIO also has a gold tip instead of whatever most other manufacturers? use, which apparently is better. Anyway, I'm just wondering if anyone else has noticed a different in the quality of sound (worse) compared to another model or not even in comparison.

I'm quite upset over this, seeing as I paid $450 for this MP3 player, when I could have bought a cheaper MPIO for $200 for much better music quality. Ah, and I also bought a pair of DJ-style ear phones (Sony) which do have a nice beat from them, but honestly still nothing compared to the MPIO ear buds.

If anyone has any suggestions, please let me know.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/318576-ipod-mini-music-quality/
Share on other sites

Well you could buy another pair of headphones because the one's included are almost never good sounding...

Maybe look for a manual EQ (dunno ipod's well sry) so that you can adjust the bass to your taste.

Other than that, if you still think it sounds bad, you could buy a better sounding mp3 player ;) (*cough* creative *cough*)

hope this helps :happy:

sim1

There's nothing gold about iPod. Nothing at all. It's such a waste of money it was. Anyone who worships iPod needs help. They are way over priced, and what do we get? **** ear buds, a click wheel (big deal) and lots of room. Whats the point of a 40GB ipod when it takes an hour to SEARCH for the artist/album you want?

Anyway, I'll be sticking with the ipod seeing as it cost me an arm and a leg. The ipod ear buds are not gold tipped... but I know the mpio ones are. Superising to be honest. Does anyone have any suggestions for ear buds? I don't like the bulky-ness of DJ-style, and I would prefer to be able to buy them in a store like Best Buy or Futureshop. Oh and the Sony ear phones are not gold either. pfft.

Gold tip or not, it should only have a minimal effect on sound quality (you shouldn't even be able to notice a difference unless your source is audiophile-grade). The iPod earbuds does sound like ...., but the sound quality in general shouldn't be THAT bad. IMO Apple's at the bottom when it comes to audio quality, but it shouldn't be bad enough to **** you off that much :/. Take it back to the store and compare it with another iPod mini, it might be a problem with the hardware.

Take a look at the headphone/canalphone threads in this forum, they should give you an idea about what to look for. DO NOT buy a headphone or earbud from FS, BB, they don't carry anything that's worth more than a penny.

Gold tip or not, it should only have a minimal effect on sound quality (you shouldn't even be able to notice a difference unless your source is audiophile-grade). The iPod earbuds does sound like ...., but the sound quality in general shouldn't be THAT bad. IMO Apple's at the bottom when it comes to audio quality, but it shouldn't be bad enough to **** you off that much :/. Take it back to the store and compare it with another iPod mini, it might be a problem with the hardware.

Take a look at the headphone/canalphone threads in this forum, they should give you an idea about what to look for. DO NOT buy a headphone or earbud from FS, BB, they don't carry anything that's worth more than a penny.

585897735[/snapback]

Gold tip only helps the electron tranfer faster and "better". It definitely doesn't necessarily mean nickel or silver plated plugs will degrade the soundquality.

IMHO, Apple earbuds aren't ALL that bad for bundled earbuds even though they are VERY poor quality. It gets loud with no distortion.

iPods and iPod mini's have weaker output than other players with 86dB(Not perfectly sure", so technically, they have more difficulty reproducing greater quality sound.

I suggest you go to RadioShack. (Yes Canada I live there[more like here] too) And get Sennheiser PX100.

They are head-band cans, but they are incredibly small and portable, as well as excellent sounding. You'll love it.

There's nothing gold about iPod. Nothing at all. It's such a waste of money it was. Anyone who worships iPod needs help. They are way over priced, and what do we get? **** ear buds, a click wheel (big deal) and lots of room. Whats the point of a 40GB ipod when it takes an hour to SEARCH for the artist/album you want?

Anyway, I'll be sticking with the ipod seeing as it cost me an arm and a leg. The ipod ear buds are not gold tipped... but I know the mpio ones are. Superising to be honest. Does anyone have any suggestions for ear buds? I don't like the bulky-ness of DJ-style, and I would prefer to be able to buy them in a store like Best Buy or Futureshop. Oh and the Sony ear phones are not gold either. pfft.

585897608[/snapback]

Takes an hour to search? You have never used an iPod have you. Its the easiest menu there is.

Coming from someone that owns a lot of players, the Ipod mini sound isn't bad. If you just have the right pair of headphones without the EQ on, you can improve the overall quality. Anything that brings out the bass, either a pair of Sennheiser PX-100's or KSC-35's are a good choice as they compensate for the IPOD's lack of bass. If you need a closed pair, then the PX-200's are a good choice although not as good as the PX-100's for overall sound. The EQ on the IPOD is just plain terrible, so I leave it off. Also, I just can't get into earbud's. Canal phone prices can go to nose bleed levels on volume, but you have to deal with them stuck way in your ear and they can get rather pricey, so the sennheiser PX-100's bang for buck is pretty impressive.

Use the free program EUPOD along with MP3 Gain for your music files and boost the volume to 40% + and you'll get stronger sound without distortion. I'm not an IPOD fanboy, just trying to get the maximum sound out of the player. In the beginning I was totally disappointed with the sound. Over time, by tweaking certain things I've grown to like it. If you feel you just can't make it sound the way you want, there are plenty of other players on the market that will serve your needs. I'd recommend www.head-fi.org to find really knowledgable people that can give you input on players, headphones and amps.

Good luck

LTM

Thank you for all your replies. LTM, thank you specifically for your reply. I'm definitely going to test these programs.

As for the general sound, I guess there is nothing I can do to benefit from it, except for turning off the EQ settings? I don't like ear phones that sit atop of your head, or even behind your ears, so I want to look for good quality ear buds. Although, I'm pretty stupid, I probably would spend a hundred dollars on them, if I can be guaranteed a good base sound. If not, I'll consider the Sennheiser PX100 (thank you).

OK, so I have looked through some of the most recent threads about ear phones and I have picked out the most commonly suggested items.

As it stands, I am looking at the following:

Sony MDR-EX51LP/WHI Fontopia Headphones

Sharp HP-MD33S Four Pole Headphones

SONY MDR-EX71

As you know, most of you obviously have more experience and knowledge than me. As I said, these three were the most recommended (for ear buds). Would any of you suggest one of the three over the other for any reasons? Any know if I can pick them up in Canada (maybe the Sony store)?

Edited by detn8r

You can pick up the MDR-EX71 for a hefty price online (sony.ca), I didn't see one in the Sony store in my city.

Out of those three, Sharp HP-MD33S is by far the best canalphone. You can import it from Japan ( http://www.audiocubes.com/ ,totals to $60, shipping included), which is cheaper than buying the Sonys here.

As Monkeh said already, MD33 are far better than Sony ex51/71. Some people prefer it over Shure e2c. But the four-pole plug can be...a little distracting, but I think you can mod it.

The ex51/71 can be acquired from the SonyStore as well as the A&B Sound. A&B Sound also carries Koss PortaPros and PX100.

From SonyStore, you can get ex81 (at least from mine), so I would recommend getting those out of other ex series cans.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I grew up a Star Trek fan and never watched Star Wars movies. To this days I've not watched most Star Wras movies. As a result I rarely get these references, I have no idea what this post means. Given the popular reactions these get I have to accept I missed out.  
    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!