How tall is the area below the iMac's screen?


Recommended Posts

the iMac is usually quite, but there are times (and it happens alot depending on what you do), where it can get loud, I mean LOUD, the fans in this thing, when they rev up all the way, sound like a JET, but that rarely happens, but it usually gets loud enough for you to notice it, but nothing to fuss about.

It's a great mac. In my experience it's very quiet, unless it's been on standby for a while, then it usually is a bit louder than normal for a short period of time while the fan kicks back in :happy:

Bawx I think they made the area so large to lift the screen up off the desk and into a better position for eye level. Some LCD's can be quite uncomfortable to use.

It's a great mac. In my experience it's very quiet, unless it's been on standby for a while, then it usually is a bit louder than normal for a short period of time while the fan kicks back in :happy:

Bawx I think they made the area so large to lift the screen up off the desk and into a better position for eye level. Some LCD's can be quite uncomfortable to use.

585899322[/snapback]

Now that you mention it, my LCD seems really low to the desk. Almost uncomfortable to the eye, compared to the iMac, seems like it's eye level. Holy crap, I kind of have to look down on my screen.

DAMN YOU APPLE! :angry:

-------------------------------

I just put a thick ass notebook under my LCD to raise it up, I'm boycotting low screens.

Reading has never been the strong point of the typical neowin visitor.

http://www.apple.com/ca/imac/specs.html

Display 20-inch (viewable) widescreen TFT active-matrix LCD, 1680 x 1050 pixels, millions of colours

http://www.apple.com/ca/displays/specs.html

Screen size (diagonal viewable image size) 20 inches (viewable)

Resolutions 1680 x 1050 pixels (optimum resolution)

20" diagonal visible area == 20" diagonal visible area the last time I checked.

Why read when people like you can research. Seriously, no one asked you directly to look it up, don't get attitude about it.

585902300[/snapback]

Before turning this into a flaming thread, it would have been better if you simply didn't react to the comment. That way it just made him look like an ass.

In anycase.... anandtech did an excellent review between the Apple 20" Cinema display & the Dell 20" LCD (I'm too lazy to get the model number, something like 2005 heh). Anywho... the reviewer mentioned that currently only produces a 20" LCD capable of 1680x1050. So the screen in the imac, 20" ACD and Dell are all the same. The flourescent light in the back might be different (as is the case with the ACD & Dell) but it wont make a huge difference.

In summary... don't reply to those that are trolling & the imac contains a (now) $799 ACD... pretty nice because for $500 more ($1299) you have a computer that is faster and has more memory then the mini hooked up to a 20" ACD but that is whole nother story :yes:

In summary... don't reply to those that are trolling & the imac contains a (now) $799 ACD... pretty nice because for $500 more ($1299) you have a computer that is faster and has more memory then the mini hooked up to a 20" ACD but that is whole nother story?:yes::

585902705[/snapback]

Not quite accurate. The 17" iMac starts at $1299, the 20" starts at $1799, so the computer part of the 20" iMac works out to $1000, not $500.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The laptop in the bedroom is an Acer with i7-10510U CPU. Acer's website states they will not be upgrading it so I had little choice other than disable secure boot. I know next to nothing on these matters so hopefully it will be fine.
    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!