Finally got parts to build a normal file server


Recommended Posts

Hello everyone. Well I finally got the money together to say good to my PII 350mhz file server computer. I just picked up 512MB RAM, and a sempron 2400 proc. I had a friend give me a sockaet A mobo. I also picked up the Cooler Master CM Stacker case to give me expandibility in the future when I buy more drives...

So.. now that I have the juice to run windows without the computer freezing up every 10 minutes, I want to load 2003 Server edition. I think that is the best one for a server right? (don't know linux).

The thing is that I am so confused with all these different 2003 server editions. There's enterprise, corporate, SBS. Which one do you guys think that I should use. I have no idea in the differences among them.

Just to give u an overview of my setup. I have 2 desktops 1 laptop and a HTPC that will always be connected to the network. I need the server to always be running to store all my movies so that I can access any time on the HTPC. I also need to be able to share partions and map them as network drives... In addition I want to have some folders to only be available to my computer so tha tno other computer on the network can see it. In addition I would like to be able to log in to the server and make changes any time as I please form a remote PC. ( I am doing that right now with ultraVNC but as I understand 2003 Server edition is specifically made for this purpose). I am really excited about the new server and I am completly new to all this. I look to finally set up my home network the right way once. Like a small business would. Please make comments, suggesitons, and please help me out with this. I appreciate everone's contribution and time. Also I believe Verizon FIOS is coming soon to my area so my crappy DSL conneciton will go, and its upload time! Thanks everyone again and sorry about the long thread.

*EDIT* Sorry guys but one more thing I need ot be able to do. I think 2003 server does this at least one of the version sright? I need for the server to automatically download the latest virus definitions from norton and all the updates and automatically update all the computers on the network (Ill make sure that they are all using the same version of norton). Also if possible to do the same with windows updates. The thing is the updates on 2003 server are probably not oging to be the same as for XP Pro which all of the computers are running right now. Thanks again guys. Hopefully I can get some help on tihs.

Microsoft do 5 versions of Server 2003:

Web, Standard, Enterprise, Datacenter and Small Business Server.

Standard Version should be fine for what you want to do.

As for the "I need for the server to automatically download the latest virus definitions from norton" you need a piece of "Norton" software to do that, but the usual "Norton 200x" software wont work on a server so you need something like Symantec Anti Virus Server 8 or 9.

Remove Management

Server 2003 allows you to control it via Remote Desktop.

ChocIST

All right thanks. Just some more quesitons. Some1 reccomnded that I use 2000 Server because its more stable and less bloated. What do you guys think about this idea? Also what are the benefits of using a domain with my setup? In addition will I be able to access the server from within anywhere through the internet?

Id use Server 2003 personally but I havent had much use with Server 2000.

Using a domain on your setup, things are controlled centerally instead of being individual workstations, alot easier if you set things up correctly the first time.

Depends on what you mean by "access".....I can Remote Desktop into my server at home from anywhere on the web aswell as access the webserver/mail server part. Really depends on what you want to do and what hardware you already have.

ChocIST

Rather use W2K Pro or XP Pro (if you have a spare license) or use nix. That is a lot of money to spend on an OS for just a file server.

585920012[/snapback]

agreed - if you are to do this legally/cheaply then best way is to use something like Linux - assuming you are setting this up purely for fileshare etc then you can do everything you could possibly want through tools in KDE etc. Something like SuSE has the automatic update function so you need not worry about patching it manually!

Plus once its configured you need not know what OS is installed on the machine

I'm sorry maxse, but I can't see any compelling reason to use Server 2003 of any variety for your purposes. I use it (Standard version) for about 25 PC's and it does all of things you want, but so does Win XP Pro. Mine also does a heck of a lot more (like run Exchange 2003, WSUS, use Group Policies and OU's, run Symantec Antivirus Corporate, run Symantec Mail Security for Microsoft Exchange, run login scripts, use IIS for Media Streaming, run Routing and Remote Access etc etc). And even then, it is well protected behind a subnet so no Windows boxes are directly exposed to the internet.

Unless you have a burning desire to spend the money to buy Server 2003 for experimental or educational purposes, I agree with the previous poster that it may be better to use XP. There is nothing you have stipulated that cannot be done with XP Pro.

hmm okay so you guys are saying in order to get the norton updates pushed out to all the computers all I need is symantec corporate? Can you post the exact version numbers?

The only real reason I want 2K3 server is because it is just more stable than XP Pro. Price not being an issue. Which one would you guys pick up? Thanks.

The only real reason I want 2K3 server is because it is just more stable than XP Pro. Price not being an issue. Which one would you guys pick up? Thanks.

585923347[/snapback]

Windows XP Pro is very reliable and will do what you want, but if you want to spend that kind of money and can afford it, go for it! ;)

maxse, when you say "Price not being an issue. Which one would you guys pick up? Thanks." that is different for me. My hard-headed side still makes me want to repeat my previous answer. But, I'd not be entirely honest if I said that because, personally, I like to play around and experiment with different OS's and versions.

I had a lot of fun getting up to speed with Server 2003 and trying out the new functionality and what it could do for me. If price is truly not an issue, I'd say skip the Small Business version of Server 2003 (I'm not a big fan of it at all, but it is pretty good value since they throw in a slightly crippled version of Exchange and a few other goodies). I'd go straight to Standard which IMHO is more versatile.

If you do, I'd probably just get the basic 5-user CAL (licences) initially, but you can add to this as required. (You'd have to check out your local MS website for pricing).

Later on, if you wanted to add other things like MS Exchange 2003, or IAS or whatever, you can. From memory I paid about $AUS1800 (equivalent to $USD1350?) for Exchange with 10 licences, but I can't recall how much the additional licences cost.

Edit added: I forgot to add that I agree with the previous poster that stability should not be an issue with either W2K3 or XP Pro SP 2. Well, at least it's not for me anyway these days - it was a lot different several years ago.

You can get Symantec Groupware (which includes Symantec Antivirus and Symantec Mail Security for MS Exchange) for about $50 per seat or so I think (starting with 10 licences?).

You'll find it to be a little bit of a learning curve with all the bits and pieces you can do on Server 2003, but I found it to be lots of fun. Once you have that mastered, if you really want to start throwing money around, you can go to Enterprise or Datacenter editions - but I hope you have deep pockets!

Your choice, and whatever happens, make sure you enjoy yourself!

Edited by omniphile

To be honest, it doesnt sound like your going to be buying this software. as your giving your self the option of what version.

If i got a *free* copy i would go for Windows 2003 Advanced Server as its the best one. If theres a cost issue just stick with standerd, as it will do MOST things, and theres proberly free alternatives of the extra's on the net.

okay thanks guys. I basically decided to go with 2K3 standard. The thing is though can I just not use the active direcotries and just share the drives and then map them as a dirve letter on the workgroup computers. I really dont have the time to learn how to set up active direcotries and simply dont have the time to play aorund. So I wil be using 2K3 just for its stability. What do you think?

okay thanks guys. I basically decided to go with 2K3 standard. The thing is though can I just not use the active direcotries and just share the drives and then map them as a dirve letter on the workgroup computers. I really dont have the time to learn how to set up active direcotries and simply dont have the time to play aorund. So I wil be using 2K3 just for its stability. What do you think?

585941633[/snapback]

Honestly, 2k3 isn't much more reliable than XP Pro... and for a file server, you might as well use XP Pro or *nix. I don't see any compelling reason to use any type of professional server for what you're doing. You might as well be taking your money and burning it. That said, expect to pay about $300-500 for the OS alone if you choose to stick with 2k3 server.

well I don't know how a meida server works mabye someone can tell me but for you need to use linux. It free you can setup samba with little to no trouble I've know a bunch about linux within 3 months of using it. With the tools out there you can have a nice server and some general knowlege of linux. I use my desektop as a webserver, ftp server, and a desktop (I'm usng nix dual to window ot play games)

dude use linux

if you want to temp web server or ftp server it is so easy to setup with a few tools

I can setup a ftp server in under 10 minutes and apache (web server) also under 10 min plus linux is low on resources. You can even close the graphic user interface down when you aren't confiruging or using the server which would save more space. Try something like debian (no ubuntu, fedora, suse because there setup is kinda goofy) and seriously it a lot easier downloading linux than I pirated version of win 2003

Microsoft Windows Sever 2003 - Enterprise or Standard Edition is your choice with SP1 is prefect :D

eBay have some good deals at times...I did a search for you

eBay UK eBay

Just be careful from whom you buy from.

Edited by DJ Prem
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Micron reveals AI companies are spending billions to lock up its memory years in advance by Karthik Mudaliar The demand for more memory is far from over, and Micron is turning the AI-driven memory shortage into a much more predictable business. The company has revealed that it has signed 16 strategic supply agreements backed by roughly $22 billion in customer deposits and other financial commitments. The contracts cover DRAM and NAND deliveries over several years, with some running through 2030. With the AI boom, demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) has grown so quickly that large customers are now prepared to help finance future production in exchange for a guaranteed supply. According to Micron’s latest financial results, the company received commitments worth about $22 billion across its new agreements. Around $18 billion is expected to arrive as cash deposits, while the rest will come through other financial arrangements. Micron says the agreements could generate approximately $100 billion in future contracted obligations. They cover around 20% of its expected DRAM shipments and one-third of its NAND shipments during their respective terms. It should be noted that although AI infrastructure is the main force behind the current shortage, not all 16 agreements with Micron involve AI companies. Micron said the customers also include consumer electronics and automotive businesses, two sectors that increasingly compete with data centers for the same manufacturing capacity. HBM is consuming an increasing share of that supply. Unlike conventional desktop or server RAM, HBM stacks multiple memory dies vertically and places them close to an AI accelerator. This gives GPUs and other AI chips access to data at much higher speeds, but it also requires more complicated manufacturing and packaging. Micron says its 12-layer HBM4 memory is now shipping in high volume for a lead customer, with samples also supplied to other companies. The chipmaker has already generated more than $1 billion in HBM4 revenue and says the product is ramping twice as quickly as its earlier HBM3E generation. Samsung has similarly warned that the memory shortage could continue into 2027 and beyond. Consumer memory companies have also had to address sharp increases in DDR5 pricing, suggesting the effects are already reaching beyond the data center. For consumers, that could mean the AI memory crunch lasts longer than expected, even as manufacturers invest heavily in new production.
    • XnConvert 1.112 by Razvan Serea  XnConvert is a cross-platform batch image-converter and resizer with a powerful and ease of use experience. All common picture and graphics formats are supported (i.e. JPG, PNG, TIFF, GIF, Camera RAW, JPEG2000, WebP, OpenEXR) as well as supporting over 500 other image formats. Also available within the batch operations include rotating, adding of watermarks, adding of text along with many image-adjustment features such as brightness, shadows and more. Among the features included are: Batch adding of files and folders Support for drag and drop of files Batch rotating, cropping, resizing and more Adding of photo masks Preserving or removing image metadata in conversions Multipage image file support (i.e animated GIF, APNG, TIFF) Command line integration via NConvert Filters - such as 'Blur', 'Gaussian Blur', 'Emboss', "Sharpen' and much more Effects - such as 'Old camera' and much more Download: XnConvert 64-bit | Standalone | ~30.0 MB (Freeware) Download: XnConvert 32-bit | Standalone Links: XnConvert Website | Screenshot | Release Announcement Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft updates Visual Studio Code with chat cost tracking and multi-agent chats by Paul Hill Microsoft has just launched Visual Studio Code 1.126, its latest weekly release. This time, the company has focused on letting you see the total cost of chat sessions to spot expensive conversations; enabling multiple chats per session that run side-by-side in one agent host Copilot session; and letting you browse new folders safely in restricted mode. We have now reached the stage where free AI in IDEs is coming to an end. To help you keep track of your costs, VS Code now lets you see the entire cost of a chat session, rather than just individual turns. This should give you more transparency about which sessions consume the most credits, so you can better manage your usage over time and spend less. For those of you using the Agents window, you know it is possible to run and manage multiple agent sessions at once. In this update, a Copilot session started from an agent host can hold several chats at once. Explaining how this feature works, Microsoft writes: Finally, from this update forward, Microsoft will remove the pop-up when opening an untrusted folder. When you open a new folder now, it will automatically open in Restricted Mode. You will see a banner that lets you manage the trust level of the folder. Microsoft has made this change so that it’s easier to start inspecting code without giving it trust right away. If you have VS Code, you can check for updates within the app now to get this new version. Otherwise, you can download it from the Visual Studio Code website.
    • Anthropic accuses Alibaba of using 25,000 fake accounts to copy Claude's capabilities by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic has accused Alibaba of using nearly 25,000 fraudulent accounts to extract capabilities from Claude on a huge scale. According to a report from Reuters, Anthropic told US lawmakers that operators linked to Alibaba and the company’s Qwen AI team generated 28.8 million exchanges with Claude between April 22 and June 5, 2026. That is a lot of Claude conversations, but Anthropic says this was not ordinary chatbot use. The company believes the accounts were part of a coordinated effort to collect answers that could help train or improve rival AI systems. The alleged campaign reportedly focused on some of Claude’s most valuable skills, including software development, multi-step reasoning, and agentic tasks. In practical terms, that means getting an AI model to plan and complete work across several stages rather than simply answering a single question. This is called 'distillation,' where AI companies use outputs from a larger model to train a smaller and cheaper one. The smaller model learns to imitate useful parts of the more capable system without needing the same amount of computing power. The distillation process isn't automatically suspicious, but the problem comes when one company gathers another provider's outputs without permission and at an industrial scale. Also, this does not mean Alibaba obtained Claude’s source code, model weights, or original training data. Instead, Anthropic claims the accounts repeatedly asked Claude carefully designed questions and collected the answers. Those answers could then be used as training material for another model. Anthropic has made similar accusations against DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax earlier this year. As Neowin previously reported, Anthropic said those three companies collectively generated more than 16 million Claude exchanges through roughly 24,000 accounts. Anthropic says the new campaign produced almost twice as many exchanges in a matter of weeks. Anthropic reportedly told lawmakers that the campaign could help Chinese AI developers approach the capabilities of its Mythos Preview model. Mythos is focused on advanced cybersecurity work, including finding and exploiting complex software vulnerabilities. via Reuters | Photo via DepositPhotos.com
    • An Indian manufacturer that assembles roughly one-third of Apple's iPhones and supplies semiconductor components to Tesla confirmed Monday that attackers had stolen and publicly published a 630-gigabyte cache of confidential files — including engineering blueprints stamped "TRADE SECRET," a 52-page quality inspection document for iPhone circuit board components, and cryptographic certificates that security experts say could be weaponized in follow-on attacks. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/319019/20260624/apple-tesla-supplier-tata-electronics-confirms-630-gb-data-theft-iphone-specs-dark-web.htm
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      176
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      133
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!