• 0

I'm crap at making magazines, help me *crys*


Question

Hello I have to redesign a magazine and it is Rugby World I'm remaking. I hate it, I'm so not creative enough, can you please look at it and tell me what is wrong, please be nice I know it's really BAD! This is why I'm asking here. Yes I have been researching and looking at other magazines.

Also why is my perfect scanned image background going all grainy no matter what size it is in InDesign? I scanned it in at 600res.

Cheers for all help, I'm hoping to get it done this weekend. I'm just finding it really hard. :cry: :cry: :cry:

http://www.potton-delph.com/bucko/stuff/magazine/6.jpg

Edited by bucko

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Ok thanks, you mean somthing like the Q magazine with there logo, ill try and sort out the yellow boxes, could you perhaps make me an example header so I have an idea wat to do, please also mention the font you use. Thanks for feedback :).

  • 0
How in did you do the header?

585951472[/snapback]

Its just typed text in PS matey. The font is VirginiaPlain. The box behind is drawn with the shapes tool and the drop shadows have been applied using the Layer Styles. :D

  • 0

Wat do you think of my leading into an artical page? See it all here

http://www.potton-delph.com/bucko/stuff/ma...artical_raw.jpg

http://www.potton-delph.com/bucko/stuff/ma...cal/artical.jpg

and comparison here. Would you class it as a redesign? How do I make it go with my new theme and how do I get the text to go in COLUMNS??? Tried searching on google and photoshop help but no look.

  • 0

Are you doing the editorial pages in PS or InDesign matey? I would advise doing it in InDesign personally. When you create a New Document you have an option to specify how many columns you want. Or with an existing document. Go to the Margins and Columns menu and go from from there. :D

  • 0

There's nothing catchy in your article redesign at all. If you look at the original, you will see how the title catches your eyes first, due to the size, which makes you want to read it.. or not, depending on your interests. But anyhow, it needs to be catchy, and there's nothing catchy in your design. Yours looks more like a letter template with some pictures. Decide what's more important on the page, how to get attention of the ready. Make a list of those things and go from there. Use of a good font is also important. Colors are very important as well, as they draw attention to things you think people should get their attention at. Plain black all over the page doesn't work at all. You said that you looked at other magazines, well maybe you should do so once more and try getting different ideas from those and intergrating them into your design.

Make not one version of your design, but several instead to later choose from and decide on the best. For the cover you could and might as well should use different logotype (magazine name) versions, mainly color-wise. You need it in order to be able to easily apply it on any kind of picture; ie light background with dark logotype or dark background with light logotype.

Hope that helps.

  • 0
Hum I suppose I could do the articals in there, could I then copy the columns over into photoshop? I just find photoshop so much easier since I use it almost every day.

585951665[/snapback]

Its just you mention InDesign in your thread title. InDesign is designed for page layout and presentation e.g. for magazines. PS is for image manipulation etc. It will be a whole lot easier to type in InDesign than trying to type loads of text in PS.

  • 0
Ok yes I'm trying it in InDesign got 2 Columns up but I have three paragraphs on the bottom text (see in my image) how do I get it all blocks at the same height but so it shows all the text and not hide it.

585951698[/snapback]

Generally in magazine design, there are four columns per A4 page. But this can vary depending on the content of the article and what message you are trying to get across to your readers. For the title page the two columns works a lot better, as in the original design, because of the attention grabbing picture and the size of the text. If you've only got text on a page and no pictures etc. make four columns, otherwise the article becomes very difficult for the reader to digest, it basically makes your eyes hurt.

Create a two column page (for the title page now) and past in your text. Play around with resizing the columns and placement of your pictures, captions, etc. until you feel you got the balance about right.

  • 0

Thats the default margins on an A4 page. I think its 12mm or something. You can alter this though. I wouldnt put any body text less than 10mm from page edge though.

  • 0

Photoshop doesn't have a good way of handling columns, or rather paragraph text as it's called in PS. If you select Type Tool, hold down the mouse button and draw a rectangle on the canvas, PS will create a paragraph text. That means text you type in that box will remain inside the boundaries of that box. The downside is that when text exceeds the box' limits, you can't transfer the exceeded text to another box to create columns that are linked. That's where InDesign comes in.

When you draw a text rectangle (aka text frame), that's by default for Type Tool in InDesign but you could use any shape to type inside (same goes for Photoshop; you use paths for that though), type in your text and if that text exceeds the limits of the rectangle, InDesign automatially displays a red plus on the right side of the rect. If you click that red plus, your cursor changes and now you can either choose a premade shape to "transfer" the exceeded text to, or draw a new rectangle which will do the same. Once that is done, those two shapes with text inside are linked together, text-wise so to say. Meaning if make any kind of adjustments to either the shapes or the text itself, the text inside those shapes automatically updates according to the changes. That's basically one way of creating columns, complex columns if you will.

Another way in InDesign to create columns is to draw a text frame and change the number of columns it should have via text frame properties. That's pretty much the fastest and easiest way to create and maintain columns.

  • 0

Thanks for telling me but I found Adobe Illustrator CS and its brill at making columns!

Tell me wat you think of these,

http://www.potton-delph.com/bucko/stuff/ma...cal/Final/5.jpg

http://www.potton-delph.com/bucko/stuff/ma...tical%202/2.jpg

Now I just got the contents page left.

  • 0

Well I have touched up the front cover a bit, still not happy with it. Tell me anything wrong. Couldnt sort out the yellow boxes.

http://www.potton-delph.com/bucko/stuff/ma...ront_cover4.jpg

Also done me contents page,

http://www.potton-delph.com/bucko/stuff/ma.../contents/1.jpg

Tell me wat you think, and also my artical pages in above post. Thanks, btw all your feedback is being printed of and going into my production folder so thanks for all your feedback!

Yes things still need touching up before I burn them to CD and take them to a print shop.

  • 0

I understand that this is an assignment for school then? If so, your best bet is to study other magazines. Take notice of the fonts and how they come together with the images used. How the layout flows and attracts the reader into reading the headers and the smaller typeface below it. A magazine cover should entice the reader and capture their eye. The articles should flow downwards on the page, as the placement of the article headers and the importance of them. Just take a look at all sorts of magazines, you'll notice the difference between a good magazine and a bad one.

Just some info to pass on. Keep on working on it, I'm sure that you will come through with the assignment in the end. Good luck!

  • 0

LOL I Spent ?13 on magazines, I HAVE BEEN LOOKING AT THEM! I have shown my work to friends and they seem to be ok with it, I think some of you guys are being to harsh, remember I have never done a magazine redesign before! And my teacher hasnt pointed me in the right direction or anything.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!