17" PowerBook Opinions


Recommended Posts

So my trusty old 600MHz Sony Vaio notebook just died, and it's time to move on to a new laptop. Given that I'm a mobility ###### who also happens to be a graphic designer, I've opted for the 17" Apple PowerBook, maxxed out.

I haven't oredered it just yet, and before I do I'd like to get some of your opinions on it. Has anyone had any problems? Any complaints? Anything you wish wasn't missing?

Also, what's up with the 1920x1400 business?

Thanks a ton!

Rob

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/320902-17-powerbook-opinions/
Share on other sites

I work for apple and my favorite powerbook is the ultimate 15". I think the 17" is a bit too big to be portable. If you wanted the larger screen, you could go with the 15 and a studio display. Unless you where looking for a desktop replacement then I would just got with the new 20? iMac is an awesome deal.

Missing? What on earth is it missing? Apple puts everything but the kitchen sink in the 17" PowerBooks, which is one of the things that makes them so damned expensive. Personally, I would get the 15" version instead of the 17" (any brand, not just the PowerBook) because those 17" screens are friggin' huge, making the whole laptop seem too big. You can get pretty much all of the same things in the 15", other than the resolution. Then again, I carry a 12" iBook, since portability is more important to me than screen size.

so are you getting it with 2 gb of ram??  cuz thats thre only upgrade i can see for the 17" lol

585924913[/snapback]

Ahh, yes then, the 2GB option.

The 17" doesn't bother me much, but working in a caf? with it might be a bit.. odd.

I hadn't thought about the 15" with the studio display option. I'll be looking into that!

Thanks!

Rob

Well, I have the setup your talking about, the 15" Powerbook with the apple display (20") and it really is an awesome set up, Got the Logitech MX1000 mouse and wireless apple keyboard and it really was worth the money. The mobility is awesome and the battery life is just amazing, 4 hrs of battery life if you just turn down the brightness on the display of the powerbook, and it still bright enough to see and all. But yeah, its just a really awesome set up, trust me, you money is worth it going into a setup like this :D

Neztea

For portability i think that the 15" is the best, the 12 seemed too small when I used it, and the 17" felt lovely to look at on a desk, but hell to carry around.

I personally will be purchasing a 15" Powerbook with 1GB ram (and since I can pull both sticks out, i will upgrade to 2gb later down the line)

graphic designer?> definatly not 12"

depending on yourself, would you sacrifice the mobility for a screen 2 inches more diagonally

-17 also has a lil bit more extra features

macintosh computers seem to have more resolution settings, or is that just cuz my 15" lcd can only support 1024x768 or i have a crappy graphic card

depending on yourself, would you sacrifice the mobility for a screen 2 inches more diagonally

-17 also has a lil bit more extra features

585929340[/snapback]

I don't think the 17" has any features that aren't available in the 15" version (other than the resolution).

edit: I just checked, and the only thing that the 17" has that isn't available in the 15" (even as a Build to Order option) is the 100GB hard drive. The max offered in the 15" is 80GB (at least through the web site). I'm sure if you talked to the right person at Apple Customer Service, you could probably get one built in though.

Edited by roadwarrior
macintosh computers seem to have more resolution settings, or is that just cuz my 15" lcd can only support 1024x768 or i have a crappy graphic card

585929340[/snapback]

It's only cheap 15" laptops that have XGA (1024x768) displays. Better ones will have SXGA+ (1400x1050) or even UXGA (1600x1200). Unforunately high resolution is something PowerBooks don't have (WXGA/1280x854 for the 15" and 1440x900 for the 17").

Anyways, the 17" is light for its class but still heavy overall. The 15" actually has a better (brightness, contrast) screen than the 17" and it doesn't really miss anything that the 17" has.

It's only cheap 15" laptops that have XGA (1024x768) displays. Better ones will have SXGA+ (1400x1050) or even UXGA (1600x1200). Unforunately high resolution is something PowerBooks don't have (WXGA/1280x854 for the 15" and 1440x900 for the 17").

585929420[/snapback]

Yes, but the other resolutions you quoted are 4:3 aspect ratio, the PowerBooks have widescreen displays, which is why they are shorter.

I personally like love the 17inch powerbook and I will be purchasing it when I go off to college. For designing I would highly recommend the 17inch. You just can't ever have enough room on your display :p

Also: The 17inch can drive the 30" display and the hard drive is bigger. Other than that the 15inch and 17inch are the same.

I personally like love the 17inch powerbook and I will be purchasing it when I go off to college. For designing I would highly recommend the 17inch. You just can't ever have enough room on your display :p

Also: The 17inch can drive the 30" display and the hard drive is bigger. Other than that the 15inch and 17inch are the same.

585929638[/snapback]

You and all the others who said this are wrong. the 15" can drive the 30" display with it's ATi Radeon 9700 128MB and the 15" also can come with a 100GB Ultra ATA Drive (5200rpm) directly from the Apple Store for both of them.

You and all the others who said this are wrong. the 15" can drive the 30" display with it's ATi Radeon 9700 128MB and the 15" also can come with a 100GB Ultra ATA Drive (5200rpm) directly from the Apple Store for both of them.

585929700[/snapback]

I know it can drive the 30" display if you get the upgraded video built into it, but according to the PowerBook specs page (which is what I was going by) the 100GB drive is not available on the 15". Maybe they made a mistake on that page.

Apple's PowerBook specs page (note what it says in the chart under hard drive)

once youve maxed out the 15" powerbook to the same specs as the 17", there is barely any difference in cost between the two.

go for the 17" :D

585931684[/snapback]

There is exactly a $200 difference in price, and over a pound difference in weight. For portability, the 15" beats the 17" hands down. That being said, if portability isn't an issue, then a 17" or 20" iMac G5 would be a much better deal.

Here is the price for both of them maxed out (17" on left, 15" on right):

yep my region of the apple online stop allow 100gb on the 15"

edit: nope its the same for you, go to where you'd buy a powerbook and then just choose 100gb under the options.

585933485[/snapback]

Yes, I know that now. I was just looking at the specs page when I made my original post stating that the 100GB drive wasn't available in the 15". Apple really should update that page.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • 1. Define "better". 2. It's still more expensive than equivalent PCs so... And there is not one Windows platform. This is the mistake ALL Apple oriented people make. Apple is one OEM. You could reasonably compare them to one PC OEM, say Dell or HP. But you can't compare them to ALL PC OEMs. Case in point, Apple has NO touch screen MacBooks. No tablet Macs. There are no rugged Macs. The variety of PC OEM design is insane. With Apple, you have... Apple. The problem is that you're starting with Apple as the definition of "good" then filtering out anything that isn't close to an existing Apple product, then trying to homogenise all of those left into a fictional product line and then ignore any innovations to create a minimal feature subset so you can say "See! Apple better!" PS: I was an Apple dev for 17 years and helped develop MacInTalk and disability solutions for Apple - and I have several Mac and MacBooks - so tread very carefully.
    • Major Xbox layoffs may claim South of Midnight developer Compulsion entirely by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft has been making major changes in its gaming wing Xbox for a few months now, including the appointment of a new CEO, a large number of leadership changes, and strategy shifts. However, the company is seemingly also looking at initiating a major layoffs wave at Xbox and perhaps even a studio closure. The new report lands from Kotaku, Xbox first-party developer Compulsion Games is being shuttered soon by Microsoft. For those unfamiliar with the studio, it's the team behind Contrast (2013), We Happy Few (2018), and South of Midnight (2025). Its latest game was quite well received, even winning a Peabody Award for its writing. It even received a 9/10 in Neowin's own review, highlighting its engaging storyline, gorgeous world, and curious characters. The studio joined Xbox Game Studios in 2018, just as Microsoft announced it is acquiring Playground Games, Undead Labs, and Ninja Theory. Despite recent listings for new staff roles, according to the new report, Compulsion Games is being closed entirely, with over 90 staff being let go. Kotaku also added that the studio's leadership is in negotiations with Microsoft about this decision, but no official details have been revealed yet. The report lands just as two senior managers of Xbox leave their posts at Microsoft Gaming. Head of Xbox Game Studios Craig Duncan and chief of staff Louise O'Connor originally began their journey in Rare and have been a part of Xbox for over two decades. Dunkan has been responsible for games like Kinect Sports and Sea of Thieves, while O'Connor was primarily working on Rare's Everwild project before its cancelation. If this report about the studio shutdown is accurate, this may just be the start of a major new layoffs wave at Xbox Game Studios. There are also rumors of Arkane Studios being heavily affected. As always, take all these reports with a grain of salt until something official materializes from Microsoft or the studios.
    • The flaw with this analysis is that this laptop has a cellphone CPU in it. In the Intel world, that would be an N150 and those are everywhere, even in low end laptops. You can get an N150 based NUC with 16GB RAM and 256GB-512GB SSD... NOT soldered in... for < $500 Canadian (around US$360). The problem is two fold: tech bloggers/writers on most tech site (like this one, ironically) overvalue Apple and apparently aren't in the same earnings class as most regular people. As a result, we get breathless articles about how everyone needs a folding phone when most people just cannot afford one... or really need one. And we get Apple used as the baseline metric regardless of whether that comparison makes any sense. If Dell or HP released a retail laptop with a cellphone motherboard, you'd be all over them for doing that - but Apple does it and it's genius. I see articles suggesting what Samsung - a company that basically started the foldable phone market and has built them for eight years - needs to do to compete with Apple's unreleased, unspecced and unseen folding phone. Sorry, no - if the Neo (really creative name there BTW - still, better than the Go, the other "creative" product name everyone's using) encourages PC makers to make cellphone laptops using lower end ARM processors, we all lose. It's a step backwards and a capitulation to the fact that semiconductor makers and computer OEMs (and tech bloggers) have totally lost the plot.
    • Everyone should install this extension and ignore games that use AI. https://chromewebstore.google....nnigaaeelfkeomjcngmnh?pli=1 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ai-warning-for-steam/
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!