Xbox 360 or PS3 Design


Which System Looks Better The PS3 Design or The xbox360  

342 members have voted

  1. 1. Which System Looks Better The PS3 Design or The xbox360

    • Playstation 3 Design Better
      159
    • Xbox 360 Looks Better
      183


Recommended Posts

The PS3 looks so crap, i gota say, the black one is the niceset but the desgine is the worst.And the controlers, what were they thinking??!!?!? i thinkt hey spent to much time in astrailia!!

The xbox 360 looks very very nice and sleek and the controler hasent changed much but its nicer that the old one!

the PS3 looks alright, but still looks chunky (at least from the supplied pic). the controller does look rather fugly.

the Xbox 360 sounds pretty good with the new specs. i don't play games much but if i was to get a console i think the xbox would be my choice

hey does the new PS3 have a HDD in it like the Xbox?

Although I don't care what's on the outside it's what's in the inside that counts, hardware and games.

I hope no ones buys a console on looks, "if" I did I would prefer the XBox design. The PS3 reminds me of a printer or a Goerge Forman grill.

The PS3 controller is butt ugly and looks heavy, but I heard it was just a concept so i'll withhold judgement there.

as all pleasing design is subjective, everyone will have a different opinion. When i saw the ps3 properly, i immediately did not like it. Somebody mentioned the overhang over the usb ports, and i agree. No visual appeal. Even the sleek black one didn't get my engine reving...

The xbox 360 i prefer. While i don't completely agree with it, it looks simpler and more elegant. Elegant like a starving elephant, because it looks a little big yet, yet smaller than its ginormous (well... big) xbox elder. If anything, it looks slimmer against xbox 1. The face plates are a nice idea, however if the body shell stays the same, and only the face plate is changeable, you're gonna get some clashy face plates...

I am gotta go for the Xbox360 (I think this is not going to be called Xbox360 when launched, it's like Whistler was for Windows XP, it could be Xenon or Xbox 2, etc, but other than Xbox360 at launch).

I will go for Xbox360 because if it's simpicility and sleek in design. I have never even owned PS2 but I have PSone and the current Xbox.

Wow, your going to buy a console just for the looks :s.. wow. But ignoring the fact, i would choose the XBOX360 over the PS3, it looks like a george forman grill lol. The controller on the ps3 is fugly, and i doubt you can use the old ps2 controllers expecially since there are no controller ports. I believe the reason they changed the controller was because of the lawsuit against them for the other one (i forget which company) but it was for the dualshock controller. The xbox controller is sick! :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!