Recommended Posts

I have these iPod in ear headphones that I use for my iPod :

http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebO...rnMore=M9394G/A

These headphones are rather uncomfortable though. I don't think I'm putting them on right. They always fall off and they feel uneasy. Sometimes, I put them on and they fit really comfortably, lol. How do you put them on the right way?

Sorry if this is a stupid question, lol. :cool:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/321640-ipod-in-ear-headphones/
Share on other sites

LOL...when I saw this thread on the mainpage...I immediately thought...oh good I can recommend some better headphones than the crappy Ipod ones...but no...somebody is asking how to use headphones.

Lets help him with this, guys, and then we should show him how to make fire and that good ol' "front to back" rule when you go to the bathroom. :rolleyes:

I find that the Etymotic Research ER?6 Isolator's are extremely comfortable and sound almost as good as my Grado SR-80's. Being constructed similar to an ear plug type of hearing protection, the ER?6 Isolator's will not fall out.

http://www.etymotic.com/ephp/er6.asp

hahaha ^ (loser)

I tried moving it in my ear! It doesn't do anything. It's just sometimes it fits, and sometimes it doesn't.

I was just asking for help.. god...

I'm sorry I asked you

585935387[/snapback]

Right...I'm the loser...sure. :rolleyes:

Whats even more ridiculous is that you have to go on the net to ask somebody how to put something in your ear. Come on, man. Seriously. Ask a friend.

I have these iPod in ear headphones that I use for my iPod :

http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebO...rnMore=M9394G/A

These headphones are rather uncomfortable though. I don't think I'm putting them on right. They always fall off and they feel uneasy. Sometimes, I put them on and they fit really comfortably, lol. How do you put them on the right way?

Sorry if this is a stupid question, lol.  :cool:

585935360[/snapback]

Ignoring the trolls (is it just me or are there are lot more of em on neowin these days?), i had that happen to me a lot with the in-the-box headphones. I was gonna buy the inear ones thinking they would solve it, but now i know not to!

Instead i use some nice cushioned Sony headphones... really awesome quality, and i'm saved the discomfort of putting stuff in my ear!

Right...I'm the loser...sure. 

Whats even more ridiculous is that you have to go on the net to ask somebody how to put something in your ear. Come on, man. Seriously. Ask a friend.

I was just asking!! I'll ask tomorrow, at school dammit.

Well thanks everyone else. I'll just use some other headphones, lol. I just wanted to know how to put these ones on.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!