Does this mean anything?


Recommended Posts

if you don't feel like reading it all, just answer the question in red :) but the story sort of sets up the scope of what was happening...

Last week some time lateish at night, driving home, left lane, front was a ford lazer, middle holden commodore, last was me in an audi 80, no other cars sighted on the road while this took place. 70kmph zone. lazer travelling at 60kmph... commodore said, "fair dinkum, had enough mate" pulled out into right lane, went for the over take. I did the same. lazer try-hard accelerates as commodore trys to overtake, which is illegal in the lazer's case. commodore obviously ****ed off, goes for 100kmph, gets a nice lead, drops back to 70kmph. I'm like holy ****, since i only realised as i was about to pass the lazer myself that the commodore gunned it that much, hit the damned brakes, dropped back to 70kmph myself. I could overtake, but that would mean nearly kissing the ass of the commodore and speeding against a rather hot headed try hard lazer. And since i had already unwittingly done 90 in a 70 zone that was enough fun.

lazer gets scared, matches our speeds. commodore could merge back into the left lane, but doesnt, neither do i, but i need to up ahead for a turn just after the train tracks. Commodore obviously was going my way, dropped back into the left lane, i dropped back into the left lane, pulled up to the railway lines since there was a train coming and the gates were down, all in the left lane, commodore, lazer, me. Lazer tard revs engine hard. I think the driver is a tard. waiting... lazer does a uturn at the railway lines, it went to double back a bit and go under the rail way lines, so woopee, goodbye good riddance. i roll up behind the commodore and wait.

now this is the bit that i don't understand, maybe it means nothing, but it seemed too intentional... im fairly sure the commodore actually saw me behind him, and saw me try to overtake the lazer. I saw the driver glance in the rear view mirror. And then, they put the reversing lights on, and im like, wtf?!?! don't do that! then they went off... then they came on again... then they went off... was that a signal for something? around these parts, i dunno anywhere else, but 2 flashes of the headlights from oncomming traffic means police speed camera up ahead. I've never seen the reversing lights. It may be completely meaningless, but it seemed delibarate considering the circumstances.

oh, and i never make a habit of speeding, that was a one off, fully unintentional. We all make mistakes but :pinch:

edit: clarification

Edited by BLEHINATOR!
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/322291-does-this-mean-anything/
Share on other sites

I don't quite follow everything that happened. Obviously you came to a stop for some reason.

Perhaps he wanted you to back up and give him some room to turn around (particularly if there was a train preventing him from going forward).

If I went in and out of reverse twice then that would be what I meant.

I don't quite follow everything that happened.  Obviously you came to a stop for some reason.

Perhaps he wanted you to back up and give him some room to turn around (particularly if there was a train preventing him from going forward).

585943430[/snapback]

well yes there was a train, i sort of said we stopped at the traintracks, but didn't say that there was actually a train... edited for clarification. i don't see why he would have wanted to back up... he did end up going the same way as me for ages... plus if he doubled back like the lazer did, he probably would have lost time doing that...

well yes there was a train, i sort of said we stopped at the traintracks, but didn't say that there was actually a train... edited for clarification. i don't see why he would have wanted to back up... he did end up going the same way as me for ages... plus if he doubled back like the lazer did, he probably would have lost time doing that...

585943446[/snapback]

Maybe, he and the lazer both knew another way across the tracks (tunnel, bridge) that would not be impeded by a train. Some freight trains take 20 minutes to pass.

Maybe he was ticked off at the lazer and was tempted to chase him down.

I'm sure he wanted to back up, probably to find another way around the tracks.

A lot fo gearheads (myself included) would rather drive for an extra 20 minutes (and waste gas) than sit and wait for a long train to pass.

As I suggested before, he probably thought about looking for a bridge / tunnel and then when you didn't move, he decided to wait it out.

Yeah, I agree. He probably wanted to get out and find an alternate route.

Or maybe he was just checking his transmission?

Haha, wow.. I guess we got it easy in the States. We can speed. I'm easily cruisin at 95mph (152 kph) in a 65mph (100 kph) highway.. swirving inbetween cars and stuff. I have control of the car, and I know I'm a competant driver. One law me and my father dont obey is speed.

In a 40mph zone (70 kph), when I'm overtaking, I easily take my car up to 80 mph (130 kph).

All the (k/m)ph's are killing me.. lol

How long were the lights on and off?

Maybe the guy just put his car in park while the train was going by. When you move the shifter from drive to park, you move through reverse. And for that second or less that you're in reverse, your back-up lights illuminate. Just a thought.

How long were the lights on and off?

Maybe the guy just put his car in park while the train was going by. When you move the shifter from drive to park, you move through reverse. And for that second or less that you're in reverse, your back-up lights illuminate. Just a thought.

585945467[/snapback]

That is assuming an automatic transmission. Not always a good assumption outside of North America.

well if it was an auto, why would he have gone from drive to park twice? And it was definitely on for a second, which is a bit long to be shuffling from drive to park. And if it was manual, it would have been delibarately done twice...

i think this is really going to be put in the too hard basket, i wouldn't worry about trying to expound any more theories into this... some of my friends around here seem to think a few different things, ie. he wanted to race, he wanted to reverse, he was saying good job (wtf?) but yeah... i was only curious :p

umm, i don't think i was delibarately. maybe he wanted to do what the tarded laser did and tried to turn around, but had second thoughts. or maybe he knew that you're a nerd and wanted to kick your ass.... nah i'm only kiddin with ya...

but still...i don't think it was a signal...unless it was telling you "2 reversi's mean laser's are tards" but totally doubt it.

i'm guessing that was at strathpine?...well, yeah i dunno.

I know here in the UK some stupid Drivers (Racers and Road rage Drivers) will pop the car into reverse as another way of saying "Back off Buddy" in other words, get off his ass and some people say. :)

But I also know that when I was with my mate who was Driving a old woman went into reverse and went straight into the front of his new Audi A3, she didnt look in her mirror, caused ?1,200 worth of damage only going about 15mph.:pinch:: So watch out, some weird drivers are about in the UK.

I know here in the UK some stupid Drivers (Racers and Road rage Drivers) will pop the car into reverse as another way of saying "Back off Buddy" in other words, get off his ass and some people say. :)

But I also know that when I was with my mate who was Driving a old woman went into reverse and went straight into the front of his new Audi A3, she didnt look in her mirror, caused ?1,200 worth of damage only going about 15mph.:pinch:: So watch out, some weird drivers are about in the UK.

585962011[/snapback]

im seeing a link, since i was driving an audi, and your mate was driving an audi, perhaps people just like reversing into audi's? :laugh::

No matter where you go in the world, you're gonna meet nutters on the road...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!