How to turn on WMV hardware acceleration


Recommended Posts

My comment on the news page keeps getting truncated so I figured I'd post this on Neowin's message board and link to it.

I now have WMV Hardware Accleration enabled on my ATI AIW 9700 Pro. :D

Here is what I did. I installed hotfix 891122:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...&displaylang=en

Then I installed:

http://download.microsoft.com/download/f/9...-global-enu.exe

Then I changed the following registry keys to 1:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Video\{*}\0000\DXVA_WMV

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Video\{*}\0000\DXVA_WMV_DEF

{*} signifies a class id that varies from installation to installation. If you have installed ATI's drivers a few times, you'll have fun finding the correct value. I recommend uninstalling your drivers, running Driver Cleaner Pro and then reinstalling them. You can find driver cleaner pro at DriverCleaner.net:

http://www.drivercleaner.net/

After I did this, I opened WMP 10 and played the 1080p Dive Into Liquid video. My CPU utilization was previously 50-65% with frame drops without hardware acceleration. With hardware acceleration, it dropped to 25-35% without frame drops. This is with an Intel 2.4GHz P4 Revision C processor and an Intel D875PBZLK motherboard.

The Dive Into Liquid video is an extremely resource intensive WMV HD. You can get it from wmvhd.com:

http://www.wmvhd.com/

Now if you would excuse me, I think I'll go have fun with hardware accelerated WMV.

Edited by Shining Arcanine
I searched my whole registry and found nothing called DXVA_WMV :( I have installed both fixes.. and nothing not a sausage.....

585991889[/snapback]

What version of the Catalyst drivers are you running? I'm running Catalyst 5.4.

Can't you just install the two patches, and check WMV Acceleration under Display Properties>Advanced>Options of the Catalyst Control Panel?

585991904[/snapback]

That would probably work too but I can't find that checkbox in the CCC. I'm running Catalyst 5.4 right now since I haven't had time to update to Catalyst 5.5 so things might have changed.

What version of the Catalyst drivers are you running? I'm running Catalyst 5.4.

That would probably work too but I can't find that checkbox in the CCC. I'm running Catalyst 5.4 right now since I haven't had time to update to Catalyst 5.5 so things might have changed.

585992038[/snapback]

Well I'm running an nVidia card a 6800GT but I thought maybe this would work for everyone I used the search within the regedit to look for DXVA_WMV but only found one string which was called EnabledDXVA_WMV which was set to 1.

Very annoying I must admit.

Well I'm running an nVidia card a 6800GT but I thought maybe this would work for everyone I used the search within the regedit to look for DXVA_WMV but only found one string which was called EnabledDXVA_WMV which was set to 1.

Very annoying I must admit.

585993784[/snapback]

If you read the topic description, you would know that this is for ATI cards only. Nvidia cards have had software to turn on WMV hardware acceleration for months. It is called PureVideo. Go to Nvidia.com for it:

http://www.nvidia.com/page/purevideo.html

You'll probably want to install the patches.

By the way, if that is a Geforce 6800GT AGP card, you can't get WMV acceleration. Its video processor is defective.

I should point out that 6800 class cards will not get any acceleration as the function is broken within the core of that card. Everyone should be well aware of this by now.

585994681[/snapback]

It will get MPEG acceleration but that is all that it will get.

how much of a performance boost should we got on a 9700 pro?

585994809[/snapback]

It depends on the video and your CPU. You should get some kind of a noticeable CPU utilization decrease through.

Does anyone know if this works on geforce fx5900xt?

585994990[/snapback]

Probably not. The video processor was introduced in the GeForce 6 series and I doubt Nvidia designed the GeForce FX with video acceleration in mind (I read that ATI did with the R300; hence why I have video acceleration).

By the way, don't bother trying the registry modification I posted. It involves a key installed by ATI's catalyst drivers and wouldn't have any effect on an Nvidia card.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Also known for https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jan/29/adware-internet.   Regards, Aryeh Goretsky    
    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!