Gaming Distro?


Recommended Posts

I recently became interested in ddual booting linux. But I also want to be able to use it throughout the day and not have to switch back to windows for certain things. The main things I use my pc for now is MSN, general net surfing, gaming and using photoshop. Im no PC noob, so dont be afriad to get technical here or whatever. I just wanna know what would be the best distro for me to try out based on these prequalifications?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/327152-gaming-distro/
Share on other sites

DX9 games struggle, but anything lower is fine.

I guess if you have a more up to date compuater that it will be fine since TG officially endorses HL2/CS:S.

On my GeForce 4 Ti4200 (yea I know...) HL2 struggled where in windows it ran perfectly fine and CS:S wouldn't even run (it gave me some BS about an unavailable games, but it's reported to work). Jedi Academy ran perfectly though ;) .

I tried running NFSU:2 it was bearable but you can't increase the quality (car reflections) or it crashes so it looked like ass. I guess CoD would run fine from the reports but I haven't tried it.

Good Luck, and report back with your results =). Oh and any distro should be fine as long as you can get Cedega running.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/327152-gaming-distro/#findComment-586003230
Share on other sites

DX9 games struggle, but anything lower is fine.

I guess if you have a more up to date compuater that it will be fine since TG officially endorses HL2/CS:S.

On my GeForce 4 Ti4200 (yea I know...) HL2 struggled where in windows it ran perfectly fine and CS:S wouldn't even run (it gave me some BS about an unavailable games, but it's reported to work).  Jedi Academy ran perfectly though  ;) .

I tried running NFSU:2 it was bearable but you can't increase the quality (car reflections) or it crashes so it looked like ass.  I guess CoD would run fine from the reports but I haven't tried it.

Good Luck, and report back with your results =).  Oh and any distro should be fine as long as you can get Cedega running.

586003230[/snapback]

This is what I'm worried about, cause a lot of the games I play are dx9.

AMD 2500+

1GB RAM

BFG GeForce 6800GT OC

I really feel like I want to make the switch, from windows to linux on my main pc (I've had an older box running *nix before), is my pc going to struggle with newer games using Cedega?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/327152-gaming-distro/#findComment-586004918
Share on other sites

Perhaps this isn't a post worthy of a 100% Linux user at home, an Open Source advocate (where it makes sense), and a Linux moderator here on Neowin, but my opinion:

Use Windows for general to serious gaming. Be it on a separate box, or dual-boot your existing box. Much less hassle, plus pretty much guaranteed compatibility.

That said, I am not a gamer. I own one non-free game: UT2004. I purchased the boxed set because I enjoyed the free demo, and they support Linux by providing an installer right on the CD. (Y)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/327152-gaming-distro/#findComment-586005027
Share on other sites

Perhaps this isn't a post worthy of a 100% Linux user at home, an Open Source advocate (where it makes sense), and a Linux moderator here on Neowin, but my opinion:

586005027[/snapback]

There's nothing with being a realist, a very insignificant portion of games get Linux ports and graphics card support is pretty dismal.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/327152-gaming-distro/#findComment-586005142
Share on other sites

Sure it can. I don't know what all these guys are bitching about. Use Google and search for cedega. As for video card support being abysmal, this isn't true at all - as all the major vendors, ATI, Nvidia, Matrox etc supply their own propriatory drivers. The only 'abysmal' part of the equation is the extent of some people's knowledge - which leads them to often conclude that these drivers are in some way difficult or complicated to install.

GJ

Edited by raid517
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/327152-gaming-distro/#findComment-586008205
Share on other sites

The only 'abysmal' part of the equation is the extent of some people's knowledge - which leads them to often conclude that these drivers are in some way difficult or complicated to install.

586008205[/snapback]

No one here said anything about difficulty in the installation, I'm talking about raw performance which on Linux side for the majority of games is dismal compared to the Windows world.

10-20% slower than Windows or even worse? Unacceptable.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/327152-gaming-distro/#findComment-586008870
Share on other sites

No one here said anything about difficulty in the installation, I'm talking about raw performance which on Linux side for the majority of games is dismal compared to the Windows world.

10-20% slower than Windows or even worse? Unacceptable.

586008870[/snapback]

...the majority of games that don't run natively. Those that do run almost the same, sometimes better.

I don't think we'll get the same performance on (all) games running through Wine/Cedega until they finish implementing the directx API, but that will happen sometime in the not-so-far future.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/327152-gaming-distro/#findComment-586009290
Share on other sites

...the majority of games that don't run natively. Those that do run almost the same, sometimes better.

586009290[/snapback]

Right, I see you've never had to fight with the ATi driver for Linux, because it took them over 3 months to even get basic 3D support for the X800 series after launch.

So spare me the "but it's native!!!1111" crap, because it won't make a damn difference here - the driver support is still laughable.

I won't even touch the subject of SLI cards in Linux, because that's another can of worms you don't want to get into.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/327152-gaming-distro/#findComment-586009323
Share on other sites

No one here said anything about difficulty in the installation, I'm talking about raw performance which on Linux side for the majority of games is dismal compared to the Windows world.

10-20% slower than Windows or even worse? Unacceptable.

586008870[/snapback]

My experience of games which provide native versions for both windows and linux:

Neverwinter nights: 10-20% faster in linux.

Doom3: 10-20% faster in windows

UT2003/4: no noticable difference.

That's pretty much all the cross-platform games I've compared.

Then again, I'm using an nvidia card, and as everybody knows, nvidia > ati in linux.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/327152-gaming-distro/#findComment-586009367
Share on other sites

I won't even touch the subject of SLI cards in Linux, because that's another can of worms you don't want to get into.

586009323[/snapback]

Let's not even pretend to suggest that Linux is a professional gaming solution. Is anyone even suggesting that?

The point is that there are some native games for Linux and a fair bit of other titles will work through an emulation-type layer with varying degress of success.

If someone is looking for a free and flexible operating system to run Open Office, surf the web and play a few, but not necessarily all, games then Linux makes a decent choice.

It gets even better when you want to use a few server-like functions.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/327152-gaming-distro/#findComment-586009492
Share on other sites

@daPhoenix, it seems to me that you are blaming Linux for things (in your view) ATI/Nvidia didn't do right. If you really have a gripe with regard to performance, complain to ATI - or Nvidia, or whoever. And the 20% performance hit you mentioned has been quoted as a figure for games played under cedega. Which is fair enough, considering that they had to backwards reinvent their own implimentation of directX (using a very small team) in the space of maybe 1 or two years. As, rezza said, give them time and they will get there.

There are others who claimed to have noticed a 20% hit on other native games - but I often notice that these reviews are written by relative n00bs on non optimised systems running for example Suse and Fedora and so on - which are both notoriously slower (you could even say 20% slower) than a lot of the competition and which often seem to sacrifice speed for compatability and stability. On a properly optimised system (whith a properly optimised kernel and properly compiled applications - even if these are Fedora or Suse systems) you can see this 'performance hit' pretty much dissapear, or in many cases (again as rezza said) it can even be significantly reversed.

Also you complain about SLI (and other things) as though you imagine that Linux had a technical department (and maybe even a complaints department) who's sole responsibility was to ensure that every new fad or minor feature enhancement was immediately implimented. However clearly this is just not possible. Linux as I'm sure really you must be aware, is still very much a community based project, staffed by a huge number of volunteers who make contributions in their own time as and when their resources permit this. Many of these people (particularly those working on the kernel AGP support) many not have SLI systems, so concequentally developing for such systems might really be very hard.

More than that perhaps they feel that there is a need to prioritise and that SLI may or may not be a long lasting feature. Perhaps too they feel (like me) that the performance gains obtained through using SLI (between 6 and 11% on many systems) is simply not significant enough to warrant the major investment in time and manpower that this would represent in order to include it as a feature. Perhaps they are supicious aswell (again like me) that SLI may just be another cheap way for Nvidia to try to hoodwink the public into always buying two of their products instead of one - for very little realtime benefit to their customers.

It seems to me that your frustrations are very much misdirected. You either have to accept Linux for what it is - or you don't. And if you can't accept it, then why not help out to try to impliment those changes that you feel are most needed? It is after all your OS - and you can change, improve and alter it in any way you see fit. In Linux I'm afraid the truth is that you very much are your own complaints department - because the typical response (and I think a valid one) to complaints like these is, 'if you don't like it, then change it.'

It really is that simple. You simply have to come to terms with it. Otherwise you will just end up shouting at the empty air.

GJ

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/327152-gaming-distro/#findComment-586009591
Share on other sites

My experience of games which provide native versions for both windows and linux:

Neverwinter nights: 10-20% faster in linux.

Doom3: 10-20% faster in windows

UT2003/4: no noticable difference.

That's pretty much all the cross-platform games I've compared.

Then again, I'm using an nvidia card, and as everybody knows, nvidia > ati in linux.

586009367[/snapback]

Hmm there is NWN for linux? I was thinking about buying the pack with both expansions in it. Is there some special version for linux or does it come together with the normal one or? :unsure:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/327152-gaming-distro/#findComment-586009660
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!