NHL deal within reach - June 15th drop dead date


Recommended Posts

Jun. 2, 2005. 01:00 AM

NHL deal within reach

Progress reported on revenue issue

Top brass rejoins hockey talks today

MARK ZWOLINSKI

SPORTS REPORTER

The NHL and its players' union made more progress on key accounting issues yesterday ? fuelling further optimism that a new collective bargaining agreement is within reach.b>

The second of two bargaining sessions in Toronto gets underway today with the two sides waiting for smaller bargaining groups to hammer out a formula for revenue reporting among the league's 30 teams.

A binding revenue formula is the key to moving the talks toward final negotiations, buafter nearly 48 hours of meetings spread over five days ? including nearly 12 hours yesterday ? has failed to produce that vital agreemNHL commissioner Gary Bettman and union chief Bob Goodenow rejoin the talks today for full-blown negotiations.s. The NHLPA executive committee, chief legal counsels from the NHL and financial lawyers from both sides met yesterday in smaller groups.

The groups are apparently close to reaching settlement on the revenue issue and there was speculation in some quarters yesterday that they had in fact reached a settlement.

"Honestly, I haven't heard anything from our people (union) ... I don't know if people are playing it up, or if something is going on. ... If it is, great," said Leafs defenceman and player representative Bryan McCHe confirmed the revenue issue is dominating the talks at the moment and that the key to a new deal will almost certainly feature a floating salary cap with player salaries tied to league revenues.s.

"If that's the plan, to have our salaries linked to revenue, then that's what we are trying to do, get on the same page (with the accounting of revenues), so no one will be in the dark about that when it comes time to make the deal," added McCabe.

"It's been talked about (linkage and caps) so we'll see, it's being worked out."

McCabe also said he was not aware of dissatisfied and desperate factions among the union membership that are pushing for an immediate end to the lockRumours of unrest in the membership, coupled with the loss of the $60 million (U.S.) ESPN broadcasting deal and approaching deadlines to re-sign key sponsors, spurred feelings that a deal was imminent.t.

"I don't feel that kind of pressure now," McCabe said. "Obviously it will get done at some point and we all feel the game belongs back on the ice."

McCabe said he doesn't feel the players will emerge the big losers in the new deal.

"I don't think anyone's going to win at this stage, since we've seen the damage to the game all over the world," McCabe said. ESPN announced that it would not pick up its $60 million option under the previous contract, but tried to retain the rights for less money.

The New York Times reported that Mark Shapiro, ESPN's executive president for programming and production, said Bettman "was uncomfortable cutting the rights fees to anything below $60 million.''

The Times reported that NHL spokesman Frank Brown confirmed that the league wasn't satisfied with the negotiations.

"When the now-expired contract was negotiated, the $60 million option price tag took a work stoppage ? potentially a long-term work stoppage ? into consideration," Brown said. "We have no interest in further devaluing the product.''

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentSe...id=968332188492

We've all been down this road before, but both sides have never been THIS close. It's always been "no progress", "we're further apart than ever", etc. Now, everytime they meet, whether or not Bettman and Goodenow are involved, progress is made little by little. A deal WILL get done, it's only a matter of when, and I'd say within a couple of weeks, no later than Canada Day.

im hoping very soon! just so i have re-insurance that NHL will be back in full swing....

i know hockey wont be back until October.. but i cant wait anymore! summer starts in 2 weeks.. and i honestly cant wait for it to be fall again.. im dying for NHL to return!!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • add $200 and get DWARF 3 model add $2000 and visit scientists center in your town add $20000 and visit the biggest telescope in Chile
    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!