Is Michael Jackson guilty?

[allfive6]

guilty

[Draconian Guppy]

If you have followed Mj's trial, You woul say that he's inocent like I do hehe..

That family it's just full of liars :pinch:

And the fact that MJ is weird doesn't make him a child molester.

586021336[/snapback]

I agree, after all the evidence provided I believe he is innocent :yes: That family has just proven to be a whole bunch money wanting sc*mbags :ninja: IMO

[davemania]

I don't care but what the hell happened to him, he needs to stay in a mental insitution

[username]

not sure... :sleep:

though some of the evidence is pretty damming

[Alien Venom]

I believe he is guilty.

I also think he doesn't fully understand what he's doing. I think he's so "in his own world," he has problems when it comes to reality. This probably stems from being a celebrity and being really popular with kids/young teens.

He needs help, not jail.

[jwjw1]

We should know in time

[Liebe]

WHO CARES?

[nemo]

i could not care less... him being a child molester doesn't affect my life...

well it does... cause Trey Parker and Matt Stone make fun of him :laugh:

[mikey1001]

It seems that he must be found legally not guilty of the specific molestation charges because there simply is doubt as to whether he did what the prosecution alleges. That's the legal side of it...however, even if he walks out of the court a free man, I'd go out on a limb and say he very likely did some diddling to some boys along the way. Fact: He fully admits to having hundreds or maybe even thousands of boys sleep in his bed. Think about that for a minute. Who HONESTLY believes that at no point there was any innapropriate "touching" or whatever over the years of sleeping with all these boys? If you want to be in denial about it, that's your perogative, but millions of church goers were in denial that their priests could have sexually assaulted their altar boys and other children in their care; but we now know what can happen. The thing is that many people want to deny that this could have happened because it's difficult to imagine someone taking advantage of pre-pubecent boys this way, it disgusts us...that sadly doesn't mean that it can't happen.

I'm not sure if Jackson is gay or bi or whatever, but I think most people would lean towards calling him gay. That in itself is nothing, what two consenting ADULTS do in the privacy of their bedrooms is none of anyone's business except the two adults. My point is as follows, let me ask all hetero guys here, do you think that is possible for you to sleep with hundreds or thousands of different women in your bed and never do ANYTHING? Ya, right. Most guys are probably thinking they might be able to last a week, and that's a big maybe! Well, Jackson has an attraction to boys similar to the attraction the strait guys have to women, and if you can't see yourself being a "gentleman" to all these different women laying nearly naked next to you, how can you see Jackson, who is an isolated multi-millionaire with massive private security, being completely innocent when sleeping in pajamas next to countless boys? It just doesn't make sense.

[Vice]

I Don't know if his guilty or not.. im not sure I mean he has children at his house all the time they found that book with naked boys in it which they put down as Art (it wasn't like dodgy polaroids was an art book or something??) and stuff like this makes him look guilty but at the same time the people bringing the case against him the Kid who said Michael touched him his not very credible (or at least that's how the trial makes him and his family look)

In the end his innocent until proven guilty and I just don't know.

[Shining Arcanine]

innocent till proven guilty seems to have changed to guilty till proven innocent thanks to many twats around the world  :ninja:

586020838[/snapback]

If you've commited a crime you're guilty regardless of what the criminal justice system says.

Of course society perverts things such as love and sex and no one has been jailed over it so regardless of whether or not Michael Jackson has perverted children, he shouldn't be jailed as by perverting children, he has done the same thing society has done which we consider to be perfectly legal.

[mikey1001]

If you've commited a crime you're guilty regardless of what the criminal justice system says.

Of course society perverts things such as love and sex and no one has been jailed over it so regardless of whether or not Michael Jackson has perverted children, he shouldn't be jailed as by perverting children, he has done the same thing society has done which we consider to be perfectly legal.

586022331[/snapback]

Umm, I'll plead ignorance here...what do you mean by that?

[cork1958]

At the moment he's innocent. (Y)

586020823[/snapback]

Quite true, but only for now! :yes:

[Pink Floyd Veteran]

not sure and I dont care

I leave his personnal life alone

[Jason S. Global Moderator]

i wish there was a "i dont give a ****" option :p

just more fake media hype.

[Yvo]

I think he is guilty.

Shouldn't this be under RWI though?

[habtro]

I'm not sure, however i've heard some stories about it... Seems pretty true to me....

[jester1x]

Guilty or not, the parents should take SOME responisbility. C'mon, why else would you leave your kid there with an older man who you don't even really know, besides knowing that you could sue the pants off of him or get him in trouble?

586020853[/snapback]

I agree. I feel like these parents had some ulterior motives for allowing their children to be in the presence of Michael Jackson. If they really wanted any type of justice, the issue of any monetary compensation should be last on the list.

However, Mr. Jackson is guilty of bad judgement.

[xplatinum]

If you have followed Mj's trial, You woul say that he's inocent like I do hehe..

That family it's just full of liars :pinch:

And the fact that MJ is weird doesn't make him a child molester.

586021336[/snapback]

I didn't follow the case, but I heard about sperm samples taken from pornographic mags as evidence or something like that.

[kak]

I don't trust any white black guy, lol! He's obviously misleading by nature.

But sarcasm aside, yeah, I think he's pretty guilty. The evidence I've heard from the news seems staggering.

[matt74441]

Hes guilty, no doubt about it. Too bad he'll never go to a real prison though, he'll just go to one fo those celebrity ones like Martha Stewart

[L3thal Veteran]

He sure is guillty.

[bfoos]

I'm not absolutely positive of his guilt or innocence but my gut feeling is he's guilty.

[Le_gin]

imo, he's definitely got something wrong with him, the way he loves being with kids etc. But i honestly think he's innocent in relations to "touching" the kids he's with. From what i've read he's a very gentle man and a great father, and although it seems he did do something he shouldn't have with the kids, i honestly don't think he'd want to do anything to hurt them mentally or physically.

Just my 2 cents.

[pre]

I think his innocent, the media just blow stuff out of proportion....