ubuntu to gentoo jump


Recommended Posts

ive been reading up on gentoo, and Im seriously considering using it. Im wondering what Im getting myself into though. How much of a jump do you think it will be from ubuntu and its apt-get debian basedness, to gentoo and portage. The reason I am considering gentoo, is I like how you can bootstrap the distro to run for your processor. The only thing thats really holding me back is wondering if portage is gonna be a pain, and the really long install process (though i know most of it is just portage doing its thing). Also should I get the X86 universal or X86 minimal install disk (I hope thats the right flavor of gentoo, reason Im staying 32 bit is Im not really happy with current 64 bit support), and what is the difference between them, thanks in advance.

Mike.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/330668-ubuntu-to-gentoo-jump/
Share on other sites

I tried it, it was a pain, i got gnome installed over a stage 1... sound wasn't working and after all that i just came back to ubuntu even though i was that close. Neat, but not as neat as ubuntu :)

586045716[/snapback]

I hit a similar snag and came back as well... I figure I'll give Gentoo a try when I have a stronger understanding of the modules/kernel features my computer needs.

Best of luck with Gentoo sonicmonkey

WAAAAAITTTT WAAAITTTTT DONT JUMPPPPP......

listen to me... there is better option....

http://lfs.osuosl.org/lfs/whatislfs.html

586045743[/snapback]

^^ I understand you're a fan of Linux from scratch, but does this really help the original poster?

^^ I understand you're a fan of Linux from scratch, but does this really help the original poster?

586045859[/snapback]

In this case, LFS is a lot like Gentoo. Both are a sort of "set them up from the ground up, just the way you want it" types of distros. So, I think that LFS would be a valid option to suggest to someone looking to possibly try a Gentoo, but not sure if that is exactly what he wants.

ive been reading up on gentoo, and Im seriously considering using it. Im wondering what Im getting myself into though. How much of a jump do you think it will be from ubuntu and its apt-get debian basedness, to gentoo and portage. The reason I am considering gentoo, is I like how you can bootstrap the distro to run for your processor. The only thing thats really holding me back is wondering if portage is gonna be a pain, and the really long install process (though i know most of it is just portage doing its thing). Also should I get the X86 universal or X86 minimal install disk (I hope thats the right flavor of gentoo, reason Im staying 32 bit is Im not really happy with current 64 bit support), and what is the difference between them, thanks in advance.

Mike.

586045702[/snapback]

Gentoo is a piece of cake and it's not something you should be worried about. In fact, it's something you should be excited about. Be worried about the overwhelming amount of control Gentoo gives you.

Get the minimal installation disk if you have internet access on that machine. The full installation will have the packages on the CD, and it's a waste if you'll be updating to the newest packages from the web anyway.

Oh, and if you can, do a stage 1 without genkernel. You'll like it a lot better :p

Here is a few tips when installing Gentoo:

Have some soda or coffee handy.

A book or a video game to play while compiling(Gnome/KDE takes roughly 12 hours to compile)

Print the install guide or have access to another compy.

In this case, LFS is a lot like Gentoo.  Both are a sort of "set them up from the ground up, just the way you want it" types of distros.  So, I think that LFS would be a valid option to suggest to someone looking to possibly try a Gentoo, but not sure if that is exactly what he wants.

586045873[/snapback]

I'd have to disagree. Granted, they are both source based distros (LFS being a book), but that's pretty much the only similarity. Gentoo is a walk in the park compared to LFS. With gentoo, you type 'emerge <whatever>' and you get your program. With LFS, you do everything yourself and as such, you learn the ins and outs of a distro. You'll learn the purposes of each package and it's interactions with other packages. You can infinitely customize it. For the average user, I'd say stick to Gentoo. In most ways, it's just as easy to use as Fedora. LFS is for the adventurous user that wants to learn things you'll never need to know about linux.

Gentoo is a piece of cake and it's not something you should be worried about. In fact, it's something you should be excited about. Be worried about the overwhelming amount of control Gentoo gives you.

Get the minimal installation disk if you have internet access on that machine. The full installation will have the packages on the CD, and it's a waste if you'll be updating to the newest packages from the web anyway.

Oh, and if you can, do a stage 1 without genkernel. You'll like it a lot better :p

586045947[/snapback]

aha, If i get universal will I be able to dodge the 12 hour gnome compile? whats with the genkernel, and if i remember correctly, stage one is where you bootstrap it to specific needs?

Here is a few tips when installing Gentoo:

Have some soda or coffee handy.

A book or a video game to play while compiling(Gnome/KDE takes roughly 12 hours to compile)

Print the install guide or have access to another compy.

586045996[/snapback]

Holy fudge!, it takes that long to compile GNOME?! geez. why that long for a wm?

Edited by s0n1cm0nk3y

Uh, compile times are dependent on the speed of the PC, on my P4, it only takes roughly eight hours to do a complete stage 1 with Gnome. Granted I've done it quite a few times, so I kinda breeze through the install, but the compile times are not that bad. KDE on the other hand takes weeks [j/k] to compile. One of the main reasons I like Gnome is because I use source based distros, namely FreeBSD and Gentoo, and Gnome takes abuot 3 hours [if xorg and mozilla are already built] to compile whereas KDE can literally take a day.

Yes bootstrapping takes a long time, but if you really want complete control over your install, then use a stage 1, I personally don't see the point of doing a stage2/3 with gentoo. If you don't want the functionallity offered by a completely source based install, then use a distro that has precompiled binaries, the install is much shorter, and the upgrading/installation of programs is much shorter.

my specs are as follows:

Asus Mobo

amd64 3200+

1024 mb ddr ram

40gb hdd (20 win/20 lin)

200gb hdd (ntfs formatted for files)

asus ATI Radeon 9600XT

onboard audio and lan

I know it shouldnt be a problem but can anyone think of any part that might cause problems (i know about ati).

As for gentoo, the reason I wanted it was the complete control. Dont get me wrong, ubuntu is great and really flexible, but Im tired of having to reinstall firefox and such just so i can get extensions and themes. Also I heard about Gentoo compiling for your proccesor (and in that case will it compile 32 bit If i use X86?). I dont want 64 bit because the lack of support (i.e. flash and etc.). Also how long do you guys think compiling stuff like gnome will take with this?

Hey Mike!

gentoo is not that hard to install - in fact, it's quite easy, just takes a while to read the (very well written) instructions. One thing to keep in mind, though: gentoo has BY FAR the best amd64 support I've seen. Pretty much everything just works on a 64bit install, and what not works out of the box works with some tinkering - just check the amd64 forum on forums.gentoo.org. Great and helpful community, BTW. And on a 64bit system, Xorg compiles in not even 6 hours, gcc is much faster on a 64bit system!

yeah i know about that, im just worried about 32 bit progs, like say flash and such. Also maybe gaim, gimp and others, im not sure if they have a 64 bit version. Is x86 the 32 bit version im looking for, i think x86 is the version that runs on pretty much all 32 bit processors.

Quick Question:

I have a server without a cd drive.  It does have a floppy drive and network access (duh, its a server).  Is there an ftp install option, like what you can do with debian/floppies/ftp.

586047558[/snapback]

I don't think gentoo provides an official way to do it, but it can be done. In fact, my first (and only) dive into gentoo was a CD-less install. I basically used the stage 1 tarball and built the system from a chroot jail. It's more complicated than simply using the CD, but it can be done.

I'm not sure what you guys are talking about when it comes to compile times... 12 hours to compile gnome is far too long. I have a lowly athlonXP 2500+ (at 3000+ speeds) and xorg only took me around 45-60 minutes to compile. Gnome and mozilla each took a few hours, KDE takes longer than gnome because it's mainly C++ instead of plain C.

Yes, x86 is the 32bit release. Still, I'd really suggest to install gentoo/ amd64. It's faster and really just works - Gaim works, GIMP works (and is faster on amd64), Flash works, games work (including Doom?/ RoE, UT2k4...), Wine and Cedega works, all drivers work just fine - and with gentoo being a source-based distro, you won't even notice a difference installing software: just "emerge gimp" and you'll get a nice 64bit GIMP... This is not Windows x64, gentoo has 64bit support for several years now!

Yes, x86 is the 32bit release. Still, I'd really suggest to install gentoo/ amd64. It's faster and really just works - Gaim works, GIMP works (and is faster on amd64), Flash works, games work (including Doom?/ RoE, UT2k4...), Wine and Cedega works, all drivers work just fine - and with gentoo being a source-based distro, you won't even notice a difference installing software: just "emerge gimp" and you'll get a nice 64bit GIMP... This is not Windows x64, gentoo has 64bit support for several years now!

586049344[/snapback]

yeah, not even going to consider win 64. Though the reason I worry was ubuntu 64 bit didnt have a 32 bit vers. of flash. Also Im wondering if theres 32 bit drivers for my onboard audio, lan, and my asus ATI Radeon 9600XT. Lol, that and Im trying to get past my lost of apt-get, i just got used to it, and started liking it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AI is the beginning, wait until real robots replace more jobs, specifically jobs that require physical work.
    • AI is indeed eliminating jobs, and Oracle just proved it by Hamid Ganji There’s no question that AI has become the hottest trend in workplaces, and every company is trying to adopt AI-driven solutions across its operations. While some industry leaders repeatedly say AI won’t lead to massive layoffs, recent data suggest that AI is actually one of the main reasons some companies are reducing their workforce. According to Oracle’s annual regulatory filing, the company has laid off about 21,000 employees, or 13% of its workforce, amid increasing AI adoption. “The adoption and deployment of AI technologies across our operations have resulted, and may continue to result, in reductions to our workforce,” Oracle said in the filing. The software giant now has approximately 141,000 full-time employees, a notable decrease from 162,000 during the same period last year. Restructuring expenses, including severance payments, cost Oracle $1.84 billion in fiscal 2026. Additionally, around 49,000 Oracle employees were based in the U.S., while approximately 92,000 were employed internationally. Like many other companies, Oracle has fully embraced AI and concentrated much of its efforts on the technology. The company is also a key participant in the United States’ $500 billion Stargate Project, which aims to build multiple AI data centers across the country. When it comes to AI adoption and its impact on the workforce, opinions remain divided. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, whose company has been one of the biggest beneficiaries of the AI boom, recently said in an interview that attributing job cuts to AI is a “lazy” narrative. “The narrative that connects AI to job loss, for many of the CEOs that are doing it – it is just too lazy. AI has just arrived, how is it possible they're already losing jobs?” Huang said. However, statistics and recent reports tell a different story. According to Layoffs.fyi, 196 tech companies have laid off about 119,800 employees so far this year. Reducing staff and replacing roles with AI agents could become one of the most significant trends in the job market in the years ahead.
    • Zoom Workplace 7.1.0.41345 by Razvan Serea Zoom Workplace for Windows is a reliable video conferencing tool that makes it easy to connect and collaborate. With features like messaging, file sharing, and app integrations, it’s designed to streamline teamwork. You’ll get high-quality audio and video, strong security with end-to-end encryption, and an intuitive interface—all of which help remote teams and businesses stay productive and connected. Zoom Workplace key features: High-Definition Video & Audio: Provides clear, reliable communication for virtual meetings. End-to-End Encryption: Ensures secure communication with strong data protection. Multi-Factor Authentication: Adds an extra layer of security for user accounts. Integration with Productivity Apps: Supports seamless integration with Microsoft Office, Google Workspace, and more. File Sharing: Easily share files during meetings for efficient collaboration. Real-Time Messaging: Enables team chat for ongoing communication. Collaborative Whiteboarding: Allows teams to brainstorm and collaborate visually. Webinar Support: Host large webinars with interactive features. Administrative Controls: Manage user permissions, meeting settings, and security features. Cloud Storage: Automatically stores meetings and files in the cloud for easy access. Cross-Platform Support: Available on Windows, macOS, and mobile devices. Meeting features: Virtual Backgrounds: Customize your background for meetings to maintain privacy or enhance professionalism. Touch Up My Appearance: Automatically smoothens skin tone for a more polished video appearance. Breakout Rooms: Divide meetings into smaller sessions for group discussions or workshops. Live Transcription: Automatically generate real-time captions during meetings for accessibility. Zoom Apps: Integrate third-party applications directly into Zoom for enhanced functionality. Meeting Reactions: Participants can use emojis for quick, non-verbal feedback during meetings. Polling: Conduct live polls during meetings to gather instant feedback from participants. Attention Tracking: Monitors participant attention during meetings to ensure engagement. Closed Captioning: Enable manual or automatic captions for a more inclusive experience. Webinar Replay: Record and share webinars with analytics for audience engagement. Download: Zoom 64-bit | 145.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Links: Zoom Website | Zoom ARM64 | Zoom Installers | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • UK funds £60M AI labs to challenge US tech dominance with open-source models by Paul Hill The UK government has awarded £60 million to Oxford University and University College London to help keep the country in the AI race by focusing on open-source, low-hardware alternatives. This is in stark contrast to the expensive, closed-source, and high-hardware-requirement models being created in the United States and elsewhere. The money will be shared among two new academic research labs over six years to help them redesign the fundamental mathematics and architectures of AI to help the UK reduce its reliance on a handful of US tech firms. Commenting on the development, AI Minister Kanishka Narayan said: Initially, the government planned to fund just one lab with a £40 million investment, but with this update, two labs will now get access to a larger pool of funds. The labs are expected to invest in the top AI researchers at every career stage, with £2 million per lab being set aside for hiring at least ten doctoral students. The government hopes that this will grow the UK’s talent in the field of AI. The labs are also expected to work closely with the leaders in British AI research, such as the Alan Turing Institute and UKRI’s AI research hubs. This will allow the various teams to collaborate and create new solutions faster than they could alone. This development is pretty interesting for a number of reasons, chiefly that it could create a long-term challenge for US tech firms if these labs successfully scale these open-source architectures that bypass the proprietary ecosystems. It could also give British businesses and public sector organizations access to AI features without paying high licensing fees to foreign providers or needing to invest in specialized server infrastructure.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!