Recommended Posts

Initally i was contemplating whether to buy the Altec Lansing MX-5021 or FX-6021 or CS21. I had read good reviews and personally tested them but i read up in some audiophile forum that the Aego 2 is one of the best so i decided to give it a try. Honestly speaking i was apprehensive about the brand as i could hardly find a review and the website for it looks shoddy.

Anyway, today i went to the store to give it a test. The price was marked down from about US$480 to US$180 which is a little more than the price of the MX-5021 (i had set my mind on it earlier).

It comes with wall mounts, mini to mini stereo cable, mini to rca cable, 5 metres of cable for the speakers and a simple manual.

The clarity is amazing. It reveals much hidden detail in songs and the bass is dynamic not boomy even if you're a trance/techno/heavy bass kind of person it will satisfy you at max.

That tiny little speaker feels like lead its heavy and solid. The sub is slightly taller than my inspire t7700 which is considered tiny to my bose system in the hall. However the power of these babies are incredible. I have to turn the volume knob about 1/10 of the way just for normal use. The sound gets unbearably loud just 3/10 of the way. Needless to say I have never tested it at half volume.

I guess the only bad point is that it does not have full bass and treble adjustments not that i would use it anyway. It does have simple bass adjustments (Min/Normal/Max) minimum is too low for my liking. I use max cause i want slightly more thump. All in all i have to say i am really pleased with this set of speakers. I have no idea what frequency range it can put out or what is the power or the decibel output but i know its pretty loud considering my t7700 is not as loud as it at 2/10 even at half volume.

Note: there isn't 10 levels of adjustments i just estimated the amount i turned on the knob

post-60049-1118474184_thumb.jpg

post-60049-1118475314_thumb.jpg

Edited by SojIrOu
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/330888-acoustic-energy-aego-2/
Share on other sites

its better than my Creative inspire T7700 (i know its not even a close comparison). the clarity is up there with the bose system but the bose has treble adjustments and this one doesn't. the bass is clear and rich (it can go very low) but not as detailed as the bose for obvious reasons (the sub has 2 drivers and is twice the size)

Last year we bought a friend of mine after serious listening sessions & investigations: I don't know which Bose model SojIrOu is referring but Aego2's are really shining in their class - also better than some entry level bookshelf types.

Btw, 180$ is unbeleivably superb price for those :o

finally someone who appreciates the Aego2. :D i bought it for S$299 so i divided it by 1.65 to convert to US$. it was marked down from S$799 which is about US$480. i saw online that it was ?299 when it first came out and droped to about ?99 so i thought why not. my dad didn't even want to go test out the MX-5021. he just told me to get it. lol.:laugh:h:

Don't worry :happy: , I'm not the only one who appreciates those little monsters, Aego2 series has lots of awards from trusted Hi-Fi magazines :cool:

They're designed by the old Bose designer (I can't remember the name but a respected Japanese guy) without imperfections in his Bose designs...

Now I'm really curious about new 5.1 Aego P2 Mk2, I haven't had a chance to listen - Sometime I should make an appointment for a listening session :p

finally someone who appreciates the Aego2.  :D i bought it for S$299 so i divided it by 1.65 to convert to US$. it was marked down from S$799 which is about US$480. i saw online that it was ?299 when it first came out and droped to about ?99 so i thought why not. my dad didn't even want to go test out the MX-5021. he just told me to get it. lol.&nbsp:laugh:h:

586057389[/snapback]

hmm i was out last week and heard some nakamichi and b&w speakers. man they're nice but way expensive. nakamichi has dual subs so they have 5.2 surround :woot: power.

i saw lots of great reviews mainly 5 stars or 4.5 stars of the Aego2 so i didn't have second thoughts about buying them. good thing i did.

the new Aego5 has even better speakers, cloth grilles and a more powerful sub i bet it'll sound nice. :D not to mention easier volume control. lol. :laugh:

i'm wondering. my dad bought the Bose system quite a while back (more than 10 years) and its made in japan. so i'm guessing its the same guy that designed the Aego2? its no wonder i find such a similarity in the sound as well.

  • 2 years later...
Yup i've adapted my foot to switch on and adjust the volume. :laugh: I wonder why they didn't design a controller with the AegoM.

edit: saw your post in the soundcard review good choice you made :happy:

Too expensive, will get the x-230's instead then return them when I have enough money and then get the Aego's. :rofl:

I bought these speakers several months ago and they are absolutely amazing for the price. Completely blow away all of the other speakers I've owned in this price range (including Logitech's). I own the newer Aego-M model which are a little more rounded.

popeye0052-img578x600-1138336048aego_m-5.jpg

Soon as you pick up the small satellite speakers and feel the weight of them, you can tell it's quality gear. They just fill up the room with sound and the bass is immense (and I'm a DnB fan!). You cannot get this kind of quality at this price. The only gripe in my case is lack of a remote, even a wired one. However, I've gotten used to it now.

I'm actually surprised to even see a review since they're not exactly common.

Edited by NegaC
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!