Recommended Posts

Initally i was contemplating whether to buy the Altec Lansing MX-5021 or FX-6021 or CS21. I had read good reviews and personally tested them but i read up in some audiophile forum that the Aego 2 is one of the best so i decided to give it a try. Honestly speaking i was apprehensive about the brand as i could hardly find a review and the website for it looks shoddy.

Anyway, today i went to the store to give it a test. The price was marked down from about US$480 to US$180 which is a little more than the price of the MX-5021 (i had set my mind on it earlier).

It comes with wall mounts, mini to mini stereo cable, mini to rca cable, 5 metres of cable for the speakers and a simple manual.

The clarity is amazing. It reveals much hidden detail in songs and the bass is dynamic not boomy even if you're a trance/techno/heavy bass kind of person it will satisfy you at max.

That tiny little speaker feels like lead its heavy and solid. The sub is slightly taller than my inspire t7700 which is considered tiny to my bose system in the hall. However the power of these babies are incredible. I have to turn the volume knob about 1/10 of the way just for normal use. The sound gets unbearably loud just 3/10 of the way. Needless to say I have never tested it at half volume.

I guess the only bad point is that it does not have full bass and treble adjustments not that i would use it anyway. It does have simple bass adjustments (Min/Normal/Max) minimum is too low for my liking. I use max cause i want slightly more thump. All in all i have to say i am really pleased with this set of speakers. I have no idea what frequency range it can put out or what is the power or the decibel output but i know its pretty loud considering my t7700 is not as loud as it at 2/10 even at half volume.

Note: there isn't 10 levels of adjustments i just estimated the amount i turned on the knob

post-60049-1118474184_thumb.jpg

post-60049-1118475314_thumb.jpg

Edited by SojIrOu
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/330888-acoustic-energy-aego-2/
Share on other sites

its better than my Creative inspire T7700 (i know its not even a close comparison). the clarity is up there with the bose system but the bose has treble adjustments and this one doesn't. the bass is clear and rich (it can go very low) but not as detailed as the bose for obvious reasons (the sub has 2 drivers and is twice the size)

Last year we bought a friend of mine after serious listening sessions & investigations: I don't know which Bose model SojIrOu is referring but Aego2's are really shining in their class - also better than some entry level bookshelf types.

Btw, 180$ is unbeleivably superb price for those :o

finally someone who appreciates the Aego2. :D i bought it for S$299 so i divided it by 1.65 to convert to US$. it was marked down from S$799 which is about US$480. i saw online that it was ?299 when it first came out and droped to about ?99 so i thought why not. my dad didn't even want to go test out the MX-5021. he just told me to get it. lol.:laugh:h:

Don't worry :happy: , I'm not the only one who appreciates those little monsters, Aego2 series has lots of awards from trusted Hi-Fi magazines :cool:

They're designed by the old Bose designer (I can't remember the name but a respected Japanese guy) without imperfections in his Bose designs...

Now I'm really curious about new 5.1 Aego P2 Mk2, I haven't had a chance to listen - Sometime I should make an appointment for a listening session :p

finally someone who appreciates the Aego2.  :D i bought it for S$299 so i divided it by 1.65 to convert to US$. it was marked down from S$799 which is about US$480. i saw online that it was ?299 when it first came out and droped to about ?99 so i thought why not. my dad didn't even want to go test out the MX-5021. he just told me to get it. lol.&nbsp:laugh:h:

586057389[/snapback]

hmm i was out last week and heard some nakamichi and b&w speakers. man they're nice but way expensive. nakamichi has dual subs so they have 5.2 surround :woot: power.

i saw lots of great reviews mainly 5 stars or 4.5 stars of the Aego2 so i didn't have second thoughts about buying them. good thing i did.

the new Aego5 has even better speakers, cloth grilles and a more powerful sub i bet it'll sound nice. :D not to mention easier volume control. lol. :laugh:

i'm wondering. my dad bought the Bose system quite a while back (more than 10 years) and its made in japan. so i'm guessing its the same guy that designed the Aego2? its no wonder i find such a similarity in the sound as well.

  • 2 years later...
Yup i've adapted my foot to switch on and adjust the volume. :laugh: I wonder why they didn't design a controller with the AegoM.

edit: saw your post in the soundcard review good choice you made :happy:

Too expensive, will get the x-230's instead then return them when I have enough money and then get the Aego's. :rofl:

I bought these speakers several months ago and they are absolutely amazing for the price. Completely blow away all of the other speakers I've owned in this price range (including Logitech's). I own the newer Aego-M model which are a little more rounded.

popeye0052-img578x600-1138336048aego_m-5.jpg

Soon as you pick up the small satellite speakers and feel the weight of them, you can tell it's quality gear. They just fill up the room with sound and the bass is immense (and I'm a DnB fan!). You cannot get this kind of quality at this price. The only gripe in my case is lack of a remote, even a wired one. However, I've gotten used to it now.

I'm actually surprised to even see a review since they're not exactly common.

Edited by NegaC
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!