Is Suse 9.3 really that good?


Recommended Posts

still really miss having apt, though, I tried to install a Rosegarden RPM but it didn't work because I have no clue how to get hold of the libmad.so package it depends on.

586172271[/snapback]

rpm --install -hv ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/misc/apt4rpm/9.3/apt{-libs,}-0.5.15cnc7-0.suse093.rb0.i586.rpm

Save

http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/suse/apt/SuSE/9.3-i386/examples/sources.list.FTP

as /etc/apt/sources.list

apt-get update

For GUI:

rpm --install ftp://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/misc/apt4rpm/9.3/synaptic-0.57-0.suse093.rb0.i586.rpm

Enjoy APT4RPM.

EDIT:

Added code tags so the urls won't croak.

EDIT^2:

You might want to remove some of the packages from the sources.list if you want to save some time - there are QUITE A FEW repositories on it, updating might take quite a while.

Edited by daPhoenix
suse used to be good. fedora ruined it. the people that like an optimized distro according to your system should stick to gentoo and the n00bs should stick to noobuntu.

586172509[/snapback]

Is Gentoo the one that doesn't have an installer ? EEesh, not that I'm a n00b, but it's a PITA to have to set that all up yourself ...

Is Gentoo the one that doesn't have an installer ? EEesh, not that I'm a n00b, but it's a PITA to have to set that all up yourself ...

586172535[/snapback]

I've always liked this Urban Dics definition:

3. gentoo

Watching sh-it scroll by for hours makes me a Linux expert overnight!

I like gentoo and hondas.

:rofl:

Hmm, I'm torn. Thanks for pointing me to apt for RPM which is nice, but what really bothers me about my SUSE installation apart from the "crippled" multimedia support, which is really a joke (they could've simply left those packages out instead of replacing them with barely functional versions) is that SUSE seems frighteningly slow on my machine (Athlon 2600+, 768 megs of RAM), most programs take pretty long to start up and access my HD all the time, Konqueror loads web pages a lot slower than Firefox, and the service manager that came with SUSE (I forgot its name, but its icon looks like traffic lights) has to be the slowest program I've come across in quite some time! I right click on a service and it takes a minute for the properties dialogue box to come up.

This is really a shame, as KDE really rocks, but how did they make it behave this slowly? I'm back on Windows now and I have the feeling my computer is twice as fast now. Kubunto also ran a lot zippier.

On the plus side, some SUSE versions of common applications seem very well put together and the easy-to-use IME is a plus, too. SUSE also does seem pretty stable (although Kopete still likes to crash) while Kubuntu's crash-happiness annoyed me quite a lot. Guess Linux and I aren't made for each other.

SUSE seems frighteningly slow on my machine (Athlon 2600+, 768 megs of RAM), most programs take pretty long to start up and access my HD all the time

586176337[/snapback]

One of the reasons it feels so "slow" is because it has been 'tuned' for every possible configuration under the sun and with extreme failsafe settings - which are incidentally also very slow.

There are tons of ways to tweak the system for extra performance.

I installed it on my PC at work last week and am running it since then most of the time. Its been working pretty good except that I cant edit my word documents cause open office ****s up the formating :( Ive been trying to get M$ Word running with wine but didnt suxeed in that yet.

I've been using it for a few weeks now on my laptop and desktop, and must say, I'm quite impressed. The built in NTFS support is excellent, good detection of hardware and easy to set up new devices, etc. Much more refined than Fedora in my opinion, YaST is excellent. I highly reccomend.

the advantage of this system is that its easy and it can do a lot of stuff (configuring etc) itself without needing user input, but u still CAN input things...

also, a total n00b to linux can enjoy it and even pro's dont need to be ashamed of using it, because of its simpliness...

i installed it once (7.3) and used a lot of LIVE cds like 9.2 and sum older ones... now i decided to install it on my 6.81 GB large partition.

i just have 2 questions left... whats the best file system again?

and: how much GBs do i need for the FULL installation of suse linux 9.3 pro (using KDE and lets say about 90% of all additional software packages -> just to make sure im ready for the future ;))?

thanks for any assistance

-fm

Out of the box Suse is indeed a resource-hog I almost turned of 40-60% of the services wich I do not use. The memory usage after a reboot is 290MB wich is twice as much as windows XP but I don't tweak enough anymore becos it feels fine as it is now.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Turbo Pascal was my first real programming experience more than 30 years ago at university. I mostly taught myself from the included examples and help documentation, because the university only taught the basic syntax and philosophy of Pascal, without going deeply into Turbo Pascal’s advanced features. I still remember when I discovered that I could embed assembly language directly into Pascal code, call BIOS functions, manipulate screen memory, use mouse interrupts, and control peripherals from my programs. That opened huge doors for me. Programming back then felt really fun, direct, and close to the machine. What I loved about Pascal was its readability and the almost instant compile time. Turbo Pascal was an amazing environment, but unfortunately Turbo Pascal for Windows 3 did not feel like it fully carried that legacy forward. Later, Delphi got things back on the right track after the messy transition to TP for Windows. Sadly, Delphi suffered from years of uncertainty as it moved from Borland to CodeGear and then to Embarcadero. That instability made many developers lose confidence in it, even though Delphi itself remained a powerful and productive tool. I still work with Delphi from time to time, but I definitely miss the old days of Turbo Pascal.
    • I hope this encodes in to AV1 or AV2 as currently tiktok uses h265 and h264.
    • Qualcomm reportedly in talks to build custom video chips for TikTok parent ByteDance by Karthik Mudaliar Qualcomm is reportedly in advanced discussions to provide custom chip-design services to Chinese tech giant ByteDance, the same company behind TikTok. According to a report from Reuters, Qualcomm could be involved in designing custom silicon tailored for ByteDance's massive data-center workloads. If it goes through, the deal would make ByteDance one of Qualcomm's early anchor customers for its fastly growing custom chip-design division, For years, Qualcomm was the king of making smartphone processors and modems. The company has also been moving into the PC ecosystem and other formats such as on-device AI for Android XR headsets. However, this particular deal is about Qualcomm's custom Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). For a platform like TikTok, ByteDance needs hardware that can help it ingest, process, and serve billions of short-form videos daily. Generalised hardware is no longer the most cost-effective and efficient route, which is why ByteDance is trying to develop custom Video Processing Units (VPUs). VPUs designed specifically for ByteDance’s algorithmic needs could drastically reduce data-center power consumption and improve encoding speeds at an unprecedented scale. The underlying tech behind these processors is actually from Qualcomm's recent acquisition of AlphaWave Semi, a high-speed connectivity specialist company. By combining AlphaWave’s high-bandwidth IP with Qualcomm’s architectural expertise, the company could begin mass production by the end of 2026, if the talks go through. All this also comes at a time when U.S.-China tech relations have dwindled. Escalating trade frictions between Washington and Beijing have severely impacted the export of high-end AI chips from U.S. firms like Nvidia, AMD, and Lam Research. Yet, the Qualcomm-ByteDance discussions show that U.S. tech companies are still actively seeking growth avenues and are open to doing business with China, where regulators still permit. Reuters notes that the outcome of this deal could be uncertain, and ByteDance might also seek partners other than Qualcomm. via Reuters | Image via DepositPhotos.com
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Almohandis earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      456
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      117
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Xenon
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!