Recommended Posts

Hey Autopatcher Team,

Long time no post! I've seen a few of those Module Panic error posts, and thought I might be able to contribute to the problem (albeit the occasional corrupt download or OS language issue).

I used the Module Installer to remove the AddOns and Tweaks modules, after which the 35601 & 35602 error messages pop up.

post-46102-1120668252.gif

When I uninstall the modules, it deletes the .amc and .lst files, but not the modules\Tweaks and modules\AddOns folders. Apparently if they are still present you get the error. So either the module scanning mechanism needs to change, or the Module Installer has to be modified to move/remove the folders when you choose to uninstall modules. Too bad you can only remove the Parent module and not the individual programs/files, instead of doing it manually.

I'm not sure if this has been documented or not, so forgive me if this is old news. Just thought you might want to fix it prior to the July release, if it is coming.

L8r

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/340940-module-panic/
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick clarification. However, I'm trying to build a 2000 and XP CD. How do I do this?

I apologize for my ignorance. I've been away from this project for TOO long, been busy with my own. However I still contact Raptor at least weekly. I'm just not familiar enough with the new version. I did a good 1/2 hour of reading posts tonight and will find more time in my busy schedule to dedicate to AP very soon!! ;)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/340940-module-panic/#findComment-586189607
Share on other sites

np ;)

the latest xp and 2k releases are almost completely compatible, theres just two problems which will be fixed in the next 2k release im working on.

1) the updated components folder in 2k is called 'updated components' while in xp its called 'components'

You need to drag and drop everything in the 2k folder into the xp folder (say yes to over-write confirmations)

2) the xp sun java module uses a setup file named sunjava.exe, whereas 2k uses jre-1_5_0_03-windows-i586-p.exe

When you over write one module with the other, you may end up with two setup files.

delete the jre-1_5_0_03-windows-i586-p.exe one, and keep sunjava.exe

then use the module editor to edit sunjava.amc and make sure its the one that uses sunjava.exe, if not edit it to do so.

(the module will become unnofficial, however it will be compatible with future releases, and allow for being overwritten by new versions).

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/340940-module-panic/#findComment-586190990
Share on other sites

I have integrated both XP and 2k using the suggestion above.

Expand the XP.  Expand the 2K over the top of it.

Move the contents of the "updated components" into the "components"

Open up the Sun Java amc - and check the name of the installer - and delete the one not used.

This version (2KXP) has since been used on a couple of machines - both 2K (1) and XP (6 - 5 Fresh - 1 Not)

The only problem I have come across is that networking problem that has come up a couple of times.

I edited all the tweak modules to make them not default - and deleted wallpaper/themes/screensavers - changed a couple of others - deleted a few more modules - and then burnt it onto CD - along with both the network installs of SP2 and SP4

Fits perfectly. Once I get the Net Problem (I hope its the tweaks) then it should be fine. If I work out the Net Problem - I will confirm what has been mentioned in the other threads.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/340940-module-panic/#findComment-586194811
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!