Recommended Posts

Official Lexus IS site now up!

Lexus.com

Boasting a 305 HP V6, the IS350 will be the superior of the two new models planned to be released. With 'paddle' style shifting.

The IS250 supports a smaller engine but all time 4-wheel drive.

I've read local articles supporting the statement of a release of a; softtop(coupe and sedan), hardtop(coupe), and a wagon.

I personally would get the non-convertable-coupe.

I've just read that the IS350 will reach 60 in about 5.7-5.8 seconds.

Pricing

2006 IS250 (base model)

$ 27,585 - Manual - RWD

$ 28,955 - Automatic - E-Shift - RWD

$ 30,905 - Automatic - E-Shift - AWD

2006 IS350 (fully loaded)

$ 42,475 - Automatic - E-shift - RWD

Any opinions?

is350.jpg

is3503.jpg

is35014.jpg

is35016.jpg

is35018.jpg

Image Credits to Fast-Autos.net

Edited by pto
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/348126-lexus-is350-and-is250/
Share on other sites

Why does the IS250 have the 6-speed manual option and the IS350 only has an automatic? Shouldn't it be the other way around?

And why the shifting paddles on an automatic? :laugh:

The interior looks nice.

586259177[/snapback]

Mercedes does that too, which is why I'd never drive a Benz.

They have a manuel option for there lower model cars, like the C230, but on the C32 AMG, the only option is automatic. I don't understand the reasoning by it.

EDIT: Oh, and about the car, I dont think it looks too good, but i'm old-school. Even at 19 years old. :p

Good to see that they've returned more to Lexus' roots. I hated the design, outside and especially inside, of the previous IS. This one looks much more of a synergy of sport and posh. In the previous IS, a luxury company tried too hard to go hardcore sport, and the result was a goofy looking nose, cheap looking rear, and just plain WIERD and uncomfortable interior. This one looks great. But WTF is with those mirrors?? They're HUGE for a car of this size!!

automatic transmission is cost-effective (meaning cheap) compared to manual transmission. The downside is that automatic converter is very difficult and pricy to fix once it is broken. For high-end cars, unless you are very sophiticated in terms of changing gears, I don't think manual is such a great choice.

Manual is normally for low end cars becuase it is seay to fix. Poor people need an easier way to get by.

By the way, if you live in Ann Arbor, Michigan, you will know how crappy it is to have a manual car. I don't care how you guys suggest otherwise, but in a city where you move and stop..and move and stop, that's tedious for changing gears.

I just love automatic transmission. Very easy to use, no more hassles.

automatic transmission is cost-effective (meaning cheap) compared to manual transmission. The downside is that automatic converter is very difficult and pricy to fix once it is broken. For high-end cars, unless you are very sophiticated in terms of changing gears, I don't think manual is such a great choice.

Manual is normally for low end cars becuase it is seay to fix. Poor people need an easier way to get by.

By the way, if you live in Ann Arbor, Michigan, you will know how crappy it is to have a manual car. I don't care how you guys suggest otherwise, but in a city where you move and stop..and move and stop, that's tedious for changing gears.

I just love automatic transmission. Very easy to use, no more hassles.

586259568[/snapback]

For an everyday car, I can agree that automatic is convenient, but for a sports-car, manuel is the only way to go. You not only lose 20% of your power just by going with automatic, but you lose 90% of the fun of driving.

Although I am not the best at driving manuel, and it takes me some time to get used to the clutch of each car, when switching different manuel car (when i'd valet), manuel is great, fun, and just... you can control the power of the car! :D

paddles on an auto is just like that retarded J-shifter thing.  Its so people who dont know how to drive standard can feel cool without the risk of wrecking their gearbox :p

586259558[/snapback]

Personal preferences, so keep that to yourself. There is nothing wrong with automatic transmission. The only benefits with manual is such that you can speed up much faster, and you can do coasting (switch to neutral) whenever necessary. It also save more gas. However, the burden of changing gears isn't what I called fun and exciting.

wow, i gotta say, toyota is really on a roll nowadays. revamping all of their lines (scion, lexus) and making every model sexier.

586262265[/snapback]

I agree with this and the previous statement that the 05 IS and below models were nothing lexus-ey at all.

Scions are super-hawt also.

Very 5 series like, I do like it.

As for the auto thing, well I think the AMG gearboxes are tuned to be sporty all the time, where as the lower models have a more saloon styled one. I believe Lexus are doing the same, if you've ever watched a SLK 55AMG go, you'll see why it's auto. The only thing I don't like about autos is you can't downshift into corners using both engine and brakes to slow, where as auto is all brakes.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • 47% profit margin? Wtf!! I know companies are in business to make money but come on man. I know for a fact I'll never own one of these.
    • Most AI-powered mainframe migration vendors expected to fail by 2030, Gartner warns by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels You may have read that many companies still run code written in ancient programming languages like COBOL and pay a handsome sum for those who can maintain that code. Well, it looks like this area of the tech world could be the scene of an AI bubble. It turns out that there are mainframe exit vendors, helping companies move their legacy mainframe systems to modern cloud environments or servers such as Microsoft Azure and AWS, using generative AI tooling. Unfortunately, 75% of these vendors are now expected to pivot or cease operations as market realities take hold by 2030. Alessandro Galimberti from Gartner said: Some of the companies in the mainframe exit market are IBM, 21CS, BMC, Broadcom, Rocket Software, DXC, GTSG, and Kyndryl. The reasons some of these firms are expected to quit the market are a reset of market expectations and a decline in demand for one-size-fits-all migration solutions. The reset in expectations is likely to be driven by cost overruns and threats to business, and the potential occurrence of critical failures within businesses as a result of bad transition implementations. These insights from Gartner are pretty interesting because it’s a specific area of the market where doubt is being cast on generative AI. Many people have cast doubt on whether AI companies will successfully justify the massive amounts spent on GenAI to date, and this data from Gartner suggests the road could be rocky for GenAI.
    • Heaven forbid they lose pennies from their Trillions! Like always, the consumer pays the most. Why is Tim Cooks even talking.....shouldn't he be packing up his office??
    • If you have the budget...! Some solo or indies just want to either learn or start their game and aren't in a capacity to pay salaries or to contractors... Get real.
    • Source and more 35 years old?! And if my maths is mathing, that means she was around 10 when The Ring came out?! Damn...scariest 10 year old I think I've ever seen. 
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Harris Gilbert earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      537
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    4. 4
      neufuse
      64
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!