• 0

[Photography] Inertia and movement


Question

You know the drill, dont come here to flame :)

Part 1 - The inertia of shame

There it is, in peace, unamovible, inert. Standing pleased in its throne in the heart. With its fragile body and his mask of cloth, Representing the humanity, seeing us all.

shamee1.jpg

Part 2 - The movement of shame

Now it's moving. The shame of losing, the shame of missing, of seeing yourself defeated, of dying in someone's mind like you never existed. shame moves and we cant stop it, only if it wants.

shamee2.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/349741-photography-inertia-and-movement/
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Not flaming, you're a very talented photographer.  I just feel that most of the stuff I've seen you post is very samey - no diversity or added creativity. Sorry :/

586289069[/snapback]

What its creativity and what standards are dictated for it?

And, in the same topic, what it is diversity? what it is originality?

The time you say "no added creativity" you are implying that I take the concepts from somewhere else. But I do not. If I create the concepts and imaginery in my mind then... that its not creativity?

  • 0
the concept is great, but the shots are too straight-forward, IMO.

586289085[/snapback]

What do you mean by that? :unsure:

Hope you guys dont take it as I am mad. I am not, when I comes to photography I take comments very seriously so I act very serious as I try to understad your points.

  • 0
What do you mean by that?  :unsure:

Hope you guys dont take it as I am mad. I am not, when I comes to photography I take comments very seriously so I act very serious as I try to understad your points.

586289133[/snapback]

it's much too chewed-up and presented.

i like to analyze artistic photography, and there's not much to work with with this piece. too much is hidden, and the stuff we do see, you previously set the grounds for, so it's already analyzed. i'd prefer if you didn't say nothing at all, and left us just with the title. and even then, the picture is pretty much straight-forward. plus, it's black and white --and while i enjoy b&w thoroughly-- i think it kills the detail in this case. you could've worked with some bluish or red hues, to liven it up.

just my thoughts, really. :)

  • 0
What do you mean by that?  :unsure:

Hope you guys dont take it as I am mad. I am not, when I comes to photography I take comments very seriously so I act very serious as I try to understad your points.

586289133[/snapback]

Actually I have to agree that the last set you made were better for the following reasons:

The pictures were more interesting. I'm not saying this set isn't good but in this set, the appearance is just a guy on a black background. Now a lot of it is deeper than just the appearance but I feel that your previous set had exciting and different backgrounds and had more to it. You had a more interesting theme to it.

Sorry if I'm not making much sense :(.

  • 0

ok this is the internet...

but if it was a 20/50 meter street poster it would have some effect

as would everything else

yet there is alot of silence in your images

in a place such as this

breath

images should not require description

you have a tendency which i like to hide the face

which in some cases is smart but the bag over head thing is...done... um..to be positive..amnesty international - actually maybe they would be interested...

if it is 2005 - which it is - personality and individuality are a must in a society dominated by consumer generalisation - it is the personal, the weird quirks - I /you have that give us identity - yet you chose to hide yet show in a outdated manner. Where is the you? Where is character of the person you photograph?

your mythology in your work is evident - dramatical yet superficial - why you hide? what have you suffered that you keep making these pieces so far away?

there are countless of images - countless of the human body in all styles forms lights concepts - on the whole the work (+ logo + sig bottom right)

i am amazed that you, with this knowledge still continue in this fashion, which is not 2005.

and it is your persistence which impresses me, but above all that you post your work on this type of (total noob non l33t @rt) enviroment (aka forum) which makes your work great - and that is where i find the personality in you, whether tragic or happy - which gets viewed by countless peopleand a 2 second glimpse ads some life into the chaos of the web.

a smilie has personality too :cry: :)

gracias y sigue trabajando

respira

shamee1.jpg

  • 0
it's much too chewed-up and presented.

i like to analyze artistic photography, and there's not much to work with with this piece. too much is hidden, and the stuff we do see, you previously set the grounds for, so it's already analyzed. i'd prefer if you didn't say nothing at all, and left us just with the title. and even then, the picture is pretty much straight-forward. plus, it's black and white --and while i enjoy b&w thoroughly-- i think it kills the detail in this case. you could've worked with some bluish or red hues, to liven it up.

just my thoughts, really. :)

586289173[/snapback]

IMO you are underestimating the meaning, since yes, I left some grounds for it but not the whole picture.

Actually I have to agree that the last set you made were better for the following reasons:

The pictures were more interesting. I'm not saying this set isn't good but in this set, the appearance is just a guy on a black background. Now a lot of it is deeper than just the appearance but I feel that your previous set had exciting and different backgrounds and had more to it. You had a more interesting theme to it.

Sorry if I'm not making much sense :(.

586289235[/snapback]

Adding a background here would defeat a certain porpuse I intended in the overall meaning.

  • 0
ok this is the internet...

but if it was a 20/50 meter  street poster it would have some effect

as would everything else

yet there is alot of silence in your images

in a place such as this

breath

images should not require description

you have a tendency which i like to hide the face

which in some cases is smart but the bag over head thing is...done... um..to be positive..amnesty international  - actually maybe they would be interested...

if it is 2005 - which it is - personality and individuality are a must in a society dominated by consumer generalisation - it is the personal, the weird quirks - I /you have that give us identity - yet you chose  to hide yet show in a outdated manner. Where is the you? Where is character of the person you photograph?

your mythology in your work is evident - dramatical yet superficial - why you hide? what have you suffered that you keep making these pieces so far away?

there are countless of images - countless of the human body in all styles forms lights concepts - on the whole the work (+ logo + sig bottom right)

i am amazed that you, with this knowledge still continue in this fashion, which is not 2005.

and it is your persistence which impresses me, but above all that you post your work on this type of (total noob non l33t @rt) enviroment (aka forum) which makes your work great - and that is where i find the personality in you, whether tragic or happy -  which gets viewed by countless peopleand a 2 second glimpse ads some life into the chaos of the web.

a smilie has personality too  :cry:                :)

gracias y sigue trabajando

respira

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v505/Lac...ogy/shamee1.jpg

586289238[/snapback]

Great post, let me answer this:

1) Its not a bag. Its a cloth mask I did. Thanks to the small resolution you cant see the details but it has eyes that are closed (shut) with needles and locks

2) I always tend to hide the face because the same reason I prefer to takes pictures without clothes. When you take away the cloths and the face of a human what its left its a representative of the whole humanity. You took out the superficial style, ergo the nationality, the age, maybe the ideology. Thats what I always want to show with my work. A sense of universality.

There is something curious in the world of photography. Arrange a concept, wgatever you want, the use a model with black clothes = gothic or industrial picture, change the model's clothes for pink but keep the background = fashion picture, change the clothes again = another kind of picture and so on.

So my intention by removing clothes and face its to show a representation, and abstraction of humanity, not an individual. I really support individuality (That its why I really oppose many social theories like modern anarchims or marxism) but my work its not for emphatise individuals, but the entire human genere.

Hope it makes sense.

3) Agreed, the style has been used before. But originality doesnt exist anymore, the best option we have its to create and regreate using our criteria.

4) To be honest I dont care if my style its not "2005" (whatever that means). Its mine. I dont want to please the trend.

5) I post my works in many places with many kind of people, so I think its unfair what you said about me taking advantage of the enviroment.

I will wait for your reply :)

  • 0
Adding a background here would defeat a certain porpuse I intended in the overall meaning.

586289248[/snapback]

Yeah I understand that for this set it would but I'm saying in general, I prefer your photography that has more than just a deep meaning.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!