best LINUX File System ?


Recommended Posts

OK. First of all: There is no single best filesystem. If there was

one particular filesystem that was better than all of the others, do

you think anybody would continue to use those others? No they wouldn't

- everybody would be using this super-filesystem.

In the real world, every filesystem has its strengths and weaknesses.

For an average everyday desktop, I'd choose either ext3 or reiserFS -

ext3 can be read from windows fairly easily, and reiser is perhaps

marginally faster. Both are very stable, and both are journaled

filesystems, so no long filesystem checks during boot.

XFS, JFS, reiser4, et al are good if you know you have a specific need for them,

but as its just going to be a normal desktop box, I wouldn't worry

about them.

  Knight said:
For desktop Linux I wouldn't reccomend ReiserFS, mainly because it doesn't fully support extended atributes, so things like Beagle and a few other search tools don't like it. I use it, however, it's a good FS aside from that.

586370825[/snapback]

Umm.....

Are you sure I don't know much about file systems, but this is on the 2.6.11.* kernel mabye even lower

  Kernel2.6.13rc5 said:
ReiserFS extended attributes (REISERFS_FS_XATTR)

Extended attributes are name:value pairs associated with inodes by

the kernel or by users (see the attr(5) manual page, or visit

<http://acl.bestbits.at/> for details).

If unsure, say N.

  ranasrule said:
iam leanin towards ext3....can i convert later 2 somethin else ?

586371303[/snapback]

Non-destructively? No. You'll need to migrate your data to a reserve-storage solution before re-mk.fs'ing

Having files that are mostly < 600mb-1gb in size does not justify choosing xfs as your fs. You can do without the additional disk-thrashing during simultaneous writes as well. Notwithstanding, it's a fine fs for media-creation. I personally use it on several boxen with raided scsi, and I love it.

For all-round performance on your desktop machine, though, stick with ext3.

If you choose to use ext3, my suggestion would be to do the following upon fs-creation:

[after mkfs.ext3..]

tune2fs -O has_journal,dir_index -o journal_data,acl /dev/hdXY

(this will ensure full-journaling, access control lists, and b-tree hashes for faster listings of large directories.)

Keep in mind that while some fs-types outperform others in certain benchmarks, efficient disk-operation occasionally requires a combination of fs-types. It's up to you to figure out how you'll be using your computer, and take the necessary steps to configure it accordingly.

Edited by sentio
  sentio said:
Non-destructively? No. You'll need to migrate your data to a reserve-storage solution before re-mk.fs'ing

Having files that are mostly < 600mb-1gb in size does not justify choosing xfs as your fs. You can do without the additional disk-thrashing during simultaneous writes as well. Notwithstanding, it's a fine fs for media-creation. I personally use it on several boxen with raided scsi, and I love it.

For all-round performance on your desktop machine, though, stick with ext3.

If you choose to use ext3, my suggestion would be to do the following upon fs-creation:

[after mkfs.ext3..]

tune2fs -O has_journal,dir_index -o journal_data,acl /dev/hdXY

(this will ensure full-journaling, access control lists, and b-tree hashes for faster listings of large directories.)

Keep in mind that while some fs-types outperform others in certain benchmarks, efficient disk-operation occasionally requires a combination of fs-types. It's up to you to figure out how you'll be using your computer, and take the necessary steps to configure it accordingly.

586371551[/snapback]

thanks for the advice :)

I' building a new Gentoo system and I have a simillar question, I can't decide between Ext3 and ReiserFS, it says ReiserFS is good at dealing with small files (4k or smaller) does that mean it will be slower (than Ext3) when dealing with bigger files?

I dunno, I may just give it a shot...

  msg43 said:
Umm.....

Are you sure I don't know much about file systems, but this is on the 2.6.11.* kernel mabye even lower

  Kernel2.6.13rc5 said:
ReiserFS extended attributes (REISERFS_FS_XATTR)

Extended attributes are name:value pairs associated with inodes by

the kernel or by users (see the attr(5) manual page, or visit

<http://acl.bestbits.at/> for details).

If unsure, say N.

586370836[/snapback]

I'm not sure what you mean, "Are you sure I don't know much about file systems", my comment wasn't a slight on you.

Linux has had support for Reiser3 xattr for a while now, but not 4. What you quoted has nothing to do with Reiser4. If no xattr is found, then Beagle jumps to SQLite, which is slow in comparison. This is why I don't always suggest Reiser4 for desktop use.

  Knight said:
I'm not sure what you mean, "Are you sure I don't know much about file systems", my comment wasn't a slight on you.

Linux has had support for Reiser3 xattr for a while now, but not 4. What you quoted has nothing to do with Reiser4. If no xattr is found, then Beagle jumps to SQLite, which is slow in comparison. This is why I don't always suggest Reiser4 for desktop use.

Oh ok I thought you were talking about reiserfs my mistake :blush:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Wait, they're training their models in the cloud? I thought they had in-house Nvidia Blackwell powered data centers for training purposes.
    • I find it shocking you would claim that Tesla's self-driving is as good as Mercedes given the actual facts with fatalities (Tesla being involved in 53$ of all fatalities) https://www.craftlawfirm.com/a...data/#accidents-per-company Part of the problem is the CEO too making wild claims about FSD when the system actually requires human supervision at all times, which then can be blamed on the ignorance of the driver. In my opinion both Tesla and the driver are at fault. I've only been in a Tesla once (as a passenger) where "FSD" was activated, and the driver only did it for a few miles and was ever ready to take back control. The Tesla owner was also fully aware that FSD was in his opinion not safe enough to be trusted without human intervention and supervision.
    • iOS 26 Photos app: What's good and what's bad in the latest update by Aditya Tiwari Apple just announced the iOS and iPadOS 26 update for various supported iPhone and iPad models. After you get past the limelight of Liquid Glass and the new naming, you'll realize the update has several features and changes to offer. Let's talk about the redesigned Photos app on iOS 26 and what the hands-on experience feels like based on the first developer beta release. It's the second year in a row when Apple has made considerable changes to the Photos app. Last year, Apple killed its tabbed interface and replaced it with a single scrollable view that displays the Library at the top, followed by various Collections. The idea of giving too much too soon didn't work for the users, and the Photos app possibly attracted more haters than lovers. Apple realized that users weren't happy with the layout and took a U-turn this time. The revamped Photos app on iOS 26 brings the tabbed interface back. You will find two tabs this time in the main view: Library and Collections. The Library tab displays photos and videos in the same old grid layout you have been seeing for years now. As you scroll to view more photos, the Library and Collection buttons morph to reveal the "Years," "Months," and "All" tabs, which you can use accordingly. All of the buttons and options have received the glass treatment, and Apple has also rearranged some elements. For instance, the "View Options" button has moved from the bottom left to the top right corner near the "Select" button. The "Search" button now sits in the bottom right corner of the Photos app for easy access, particularly useful when using the iPhone with one hand. For comparison, this is how options in the Photos app looked on iOS 18. A highlight of the updated photos app is a feature called Spatial Scene. When you open an image in the app, you can tap on the Spatial Scene button at the top-right to transform the image into its 3D self. Once the processing is done, you can tilt your iPhone in different directions to experience the 3D effect. The feature works for new and old images alike, even the ones you clicked years ago. It doesn't work for videos and screenshots captured on the device. Moving on to the Collections tab, its default view displays different categories, such as Memories, Pinned, Albums, People, Shared Albums, and more, in a list that you can reorder according to your preference. You can tap on any category name to reveal the collections inside or tap the arrow next to it to display the same in a drop-down interface. You can customize the look and feel of the Collections tab using the three-dot menu at the top. It reveals two other layout options, as well as options to show, collapse, or reorder all the Collections categories in a single tap. You can also reorder the categories using the button present at the bottom of the Collections tab. Thanks to the collapsible nature of the Collections categories, the iOS 26 Photos app doesn't feel cluttered like its previous version. One useful thing to note is that the Photos app remembers the categories you expand in the Collections tab. In other words, if you expand just one (or more) category and collapse the rest of them, the Collections tab will stay that way even if you re-open the Photos app. Speaking of memory, the Photos app can also remember whether you were in the Library tab or the Collections tab when you last used the app. What's wrong with the new Photos app Apple's Liquid Glass-inspired Photos app has brought back the old familiar interface for users. However, it says goodbye to some of the good things Apple introduced in the last version. The single-scroll interface of the Photos app on iOS 18 made it easier to access collections like Screenshots and Videos. You could hide screenshots from the main Library view but quickly access them through a collection pinned just below it. Previous versions of the Photos app displayed the sync progress at the bottom of the Library. That information was hidden behind the profile picture icon on iOS 18. Now, with the latest update, you need several clicks to check whether your latest photos and videos are synced to your iCloud account because the profile picture icon is now a part of the Collections tab. Perhaps Apple chose to hide it away, as few people were bothered by its existence. However, the small feature was quite handy for users who had unstable internet connections. There is some indication, though, that the profile icon displays a progress bar and a yellow dot to inform about an unfinished sync process. On a side note, an early beta version of the iOS 18 Photos app allowed users to swipe right or left on the Library view to access different collections. The feature would have been quite helpful if it hadn't been cut, at least for users who want to access their Utilities, Media Types, Screenshots, and other collections quickly. It could have been made optional in the Photos app. That said, iOS 26 is still in its development phase, and the Photos app might add or remove features as more beta releases arrive. Apple is expected to push the first public beta sometime in July. You can try out the app now by installing the developer beta; however, keep in mind that the build may be unstable and surface unexpected bugs.
    • I don't have a problem with the Chromium backend, if fact I would prefer it over the Gecko backend, just as long as Firefox has the flexibility and customisation that it's got now, which is far better than Chrome. In any case, I think Mozilla continued backing of the Gecko engine is going to run them out of business, and I wonder how little market share they need to have for that realisation to set it. Whether we like it or not, the Chromium backend won, it overall performs better and is more of a standard, being that it's open source, I see no reason for Firefox to not adopt it, especially considering almost everyone else did. Either way, I think the days are numbered for Firefox, so Mozilla likely need to do some soul-searching if they want to survive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Posting Machine
      David Uzondu earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • One Month Later
      Stokenking earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Kevin Jones earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Kevin Jones earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      henryj earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      530
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      265
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      198
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      188
    5. 5
      snowy owl
      137
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!