Recommended Posts

index.3.jpg

Stardock has released the first beta of a new program called StyleVista. StyleVista allows Windows Vista beta users to alter the existing "Aero glass" interface to have different opacity levels and different colors.

By default, Windows Vista's new user interface has semi-transparent title bars and borders. While it looks quite cool, it is not currently configurable. StyleVista enables users to change both the color and opacity (how transparent the title bars and borders are) of the GUI for the active and inactive window.

StyleVista is not similar to Stardock WindowBlinds which can change the actual skin of the GUI. It alters the existing GUI. Stardock may make some of the features in StyleVista part of WindowBlinds 5 which is due to go into beta next month.

StyleVista is a free and can be downloaded at Stylevista.net

Screenshots:

sv3_small.jpg

sv1_small.jpg

sv2_small.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/359668-stardock-releases-beta-of-stylevista/
Share on other sites

While that's definitely a cool concept, I have some doubts about this. First of all, anyone legitimately using Longhorn should be more concerned with things other than the looks. Second, with the rumored project M slated to, perhaps, replace the current theme, does this have much of a shelf life?

While that's definitely a cool concept, I have some doubts about this. First of all, anyone legitimately using Longhorn should be more concerned with things other than the looks. Second, with the rumored project M slated to, perhaps, replace the current theme, does this have much of a shelf life?

586387856[/snapback]

Two things come to mind.

1. Will project M ever see the light of day? And even if it does, will it make it into Vista? No one knows at this point. Look at all the features that were supposed to be in Vista that are now dropped or planned for releases after the rtm of Vista.

2. When you are a company that specializes in customization of OS's like Stardock does, isn't one of their main goals to start development of programs for use on the newest os?

Two things come to mind.

1. Will project M ever see the light of day?  And even if it does, will it make it into Vista?  No one knows at this point.  Look at all the features that were supposed to be in Vista that are now dropped or planned for releases after the rtm of Vista.

2. When you are a company that specializes in customization of OS's like Stardock does, isn't one of their main goals to start development of programs for use on the newest os?

586387887[/snapback]

Well, project M is said to be the Luna of Vista. If that's the case, this will all be for naught.

People besides beta testers are running Vista.

Get over it.

586388642[/snapback]

You just blew my mind. ;) I've been testing Vista since launch (legally) and isn't the point of testing to test out the OS as well as apps on the new OS? That would include UI programs.

stylevista? give me a break

you couldn't come up with a different name?

586389129[/snapback]

Hmm according to the given historical fact that the makers of that other "tool" You might be reffering to weren't "the company that started the 3rd party visual styles craze with the first software and tools" as they state so hypocritical the name is really okay.

In fact I had a good laugh when I read it. :D

Stardock deals with the new technologies Vista is using and shares a small part of it's efforts with people. So what ? But some people will still find reasons to bash them...

That just stole the name StyleVista before the StyleXP guys could take it. :whistle: This program is sort of "noobish" in the current release.  Hopefully they will add a lot more features like making the taskbar transparent.  :rofl:

586389659[/snapback]

I think TGTSoft will be pretty f***d, when Vista comes out. The transparent taskbar will come with WindowBlinds 5. This tool has another purpose.

I have WB 4.51 and my taskbar is already transparent.

Or is this the alpha or something?

As for the StyleVista, I don't think much of it.

I didn't really care for the skin, because for one:

1. My windowsblinds transparency still have readable text (behind the images)

2. The text behind the Vista transparency is jacked up.

Its almost like its intentional..

IF project 'M' is being worked on, I am sure that Microsoft would not have included a Glass theme in to Vista if this 'M' wasn't going to somehow be used as a learning curve. I would not be surprised if Stardock are doing the same. The more they can customise now, the easier it'll be for them to create a good application shortly after launch.

Can they make it work on the none-glass style? such as just changing colors?

QUOTE(Runiteshark @ Aug 17 2005, 08:37)

I have WB 4.51 and my taskbar is already transparent.

Yes but is the start button still perfectly visible? I think a transparent taskbar only looks good if only some parts are transparent, like THIS. Almost perfect.

Just a question: that forest wallpaper in your screenshot looks great. where can I get it?

what do u mean? can it change the colors or not if glass is not enabled?

586409192[/snapback]

I assume that you can't because of:

StyleVista is a program designed to allow users to change the style of Windows Vista's glass user interface.

Why not

Download it and find out...

You could probably reshack aero.msstyles and pull out the non glass objects and replace them with the ones in the folder. Then reshack aero.msstyles again and replace the objects with the ones in the folder.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!