The basics on setting up folder share permissions


Recommended Posts

I have some folders i want to share, but only want one user to be able to read/write/change (+ admins)

In sharing permissions "Everyone" is already listed with read permissions.

- I uncheck the read permission (i don't check deny).

- I add the user i want to give access, and check "Full control".

This gives the user "Access denied" when trying to access it.

I have to give "Everyone" full access to let the user full access... :(

Does anyonw know what i'm doing wrong?

Could anyone write, or link to a guide that lists up exactly what i need to do to let user "James" be able to access a shared folder, from any computer? (the account have same pass on all computers).

:blush:

  James_T said:
you also must give the user access rights on the folder directly (ntfs rights in the security tab)

586413834[/snapback]

I forgot to mention it, but i already have set up the user with "Full controll" permissions on the folder.

hmm.

have you tried to map the folder as a network drive?

e.g.: you share a folder on PC1 called "share"

the user with full control is John

on PC2: map a network drive x to \\PC1\share with different user credentials

(in this case user: PC1\John)

this should work.

also check if there are any firewalls enabled on PC1 which could block filesharing.

There are two types of Permissions when setting up network shares, Share Permissions, and your File System Permissions.

Perhaps you have set-up the share permissions correctly, and not altered the File System Permissions? Easily done...

Microsoft article, and its only 8 points long. It is for XP, but the same for 2000 and 2003. Only diff is in 2000 the default share for the everyone group is Full, where as in XP/2003 it is Read (glad they fixed that).

How to Share and Set Permissions for Folders and Files Using Windows XP

Here is what i did now:

1. Created a new folder

2. In sharing properties i click permissions.

3. In permissions i uncheck "read" for "Everyone". I add me as a user, and check "full control".

4. When clicking apply, "Everyone" is removed (since it didn't have any permissions).

5. I click the security tab, and can assure that my user have "Full controll". Every other users perimissions here are default (remember: i created a new folder)

6. From an other computer, logged in as a user with same username and password as the one i added to the share, i enter \\server\shared folder\:

  Quote
Access is denied
.

:no:

It should be fine that the username and password is set up the same on other computers - I use that myself.

If you've any doubts about it being that goto the "Stored User Names and Passwords" applet and add the username for the other computers, e.g. on PC1 add user name and password for PC2, PC2\Username.

I have figured out whats wrong... :rolleyes:

Do not name your computer "X". I suppose the computer name is too short, or X is some kind of reserved name (I remember i had some problems when using the computer name "Server" also).

When using the IP-adress instead of the one-letter-servername it works - without any "Access denied" error...

That leads me to another question...

Are there any way i can change the name of the computer without reinstalling everything? The server is set up as Domain controller with DNS/Active directory/Exchange server installed. I suppose it's faster and easier to just reinstall everything? :|

Edited by GeeZuZz
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm old I guess, first thing I think of is just regular input/output.
    • Now, kids, Dan O'Dowd is what we call a professional hater.
    • Billionaire slams 'Tesla Cultists' for praising Robotaxi, says it's 5+ years behind Waymo by David Uzondu Image via Depositphotos.com The Tesla Robotaxi program has kicked off in Austin, Texas, and reactions are pouring in from all corners of the internet. A select group of investors and influencers have been invited to try the service, which operates within a limited area of South Austin for a price of $4.20. While the vehicles are operating without anyone in the driver's seat, the program has specific rules for this pilot phase, including a human "safety monitor" who rides along in the passenger seat just in case things go sideways. Of course, the launch did not go unnoticed by Tesla's most vocal and well-funded critic, Dan O'Dowd. O'Dowd is the billionaire founder of a group called The Dawn Project, which has dedicated itself to highlighting what it calls critical safety failures in Tesla's Full Self-Driving software. He refers to himself as an expert in creating "unhackable" software for military and aerospace clients, and ran for U.S. Senate back in 2022 on a single-issue platform: to "make computers safe for humanity" by banning Tesla's FSD. In 2023, He was banned from advertising on X after He made promoted posts that show Tesla FSD among other things, failing to stop at Stop signs. Last year, his group, The Dawn Project, paid for a Super Bowl ad, where a Tesla equipped with FSD did not act on a child-sized mannequin in the road. That commercial ends with a message, urging parents to "boycott Tesla to keep your kids safe." Today, O'Dowd took to X to slam the launch of the Robotaxi service, saying the "Tesla Cultists are celebrating victory" over a system he believes is years behind the competition (especially Waymo). He pointed out that with only fourteen cars operating for half the day, the system was already making significant errors, a rate he claims is consistent with community-tracked FSD data. The videos shared by the creators (Rob Maurer and Ed Niedermeyer), O'Dowd mentioned in his post, appear questionable, depending on your perspective. In Maurer's video, a trip that was otherwise smooth had a few unnerving seconds of the vehicle slightly swerving into the wrong lane, correcting itself, swerving again, correcting itself, and then finally settling. The other video from Ed Niedermeyer shows something entirely different. Niedermeyer captured a Tesla Robotaxi approaching an "extensive crime scene" with multiple police vehicles parked on the side of the road. On his personal Bluesky account (Ed stopped posting on X late last year, in protest of Musk), He claims the Tesla braked hard twice for no clear reason. In his commentary, Niedermeyer argued the car "shouldn't react to any of these police vehicles," and that it was concerning how it reacted to some but not others, before stopping in the "middle of the road instead of defaulting to a minimal risk condition."
    • Arch is now also using Wayland as the default session for Plasma 6.4, with X11 session becoming optional (so upgrading to Plasma 6.4 on X11 Arch might need manual intervention). It's been well over a decade in making, but I guess the time for Wayland to be the default is finally upon us.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      ravenmanNE earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      Brett76 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      Miguel Batista earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dedicated
      moojay67 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      664
    2. 2
      Michael Scrip
      229
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      218
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      148
    5. 5
      Xenon
      141
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!