Linux lacks in hardware support


Recommended Posts

  C:\Smoke> said:
I think that linux really lacks in hardware support!

Also, anything you can do in linux can be done in Windows...

Not everything you can do in Windows can be done in Linux. (tis getting better tho)

You can't get ahead if you have yet to catch up...

Just my 2 cents.

586416209[/snapback]

Hardware support is great!

Even my cheapass scanner works with linux.

what hardware did not work?

please be specific.

Maybe it works out of the box , but that you have to edit a config file.

  mr_demilord said:
Even my cheapass scanner works with linux.

586416229[/snapback]

There you have it. Linux only has the most basic support for most hardware, that's acceptable for cheap hardware but if you got expensive hardware you want to use your hardware to it's limits, something you can usually never achieve with reverse enginreering.

  mr_demilord said:
Hardware support is great!

Even my cheapass scanner works with linux.

what hardware did not work?

please be specific.

Maybe it works out of the box , but that you have to edit a config file.

586416229[/snapback]

Not all scanners do.

http://hardware.linuxfaqs.de/view.php?tab=peri&ctype=Scanner

For me, though, my Canon IX-4015 works in Linux just fine. Does not work in XP at all.

  pappmasta said:
Glad someone said it.....

No its dosent becauase people dont work for free or give ideas away for free.

Yes there is freeware but i cant think of much free that got real popular and didnt have some sort of money making scheme

which is ok, cause i dont expect to have dazzling features handed to me for free.

Linux is more then capable of dazzling me but people who work for free have yet to do it...

586416243[/snapback]

Why is it that people still think no one who works on Linux/Open Source is employed... :no: Edited by markjensen
  Quote
I think that linux really lacks in hardware support!

Contrary to popular belief, Linux has the best hardware support of any OS. For every piece of hardware unsupported on Linux, I'll give you two devices unsupported on XP (for XP x64, I'll even give you 5 devices, 10 for XP ia64 :-) )...

  Quote
Also, anything you can do in linux can be done in Windows...

Not quite sure what you mean? In reality, I know of nothing important Windows does that Linux doesn't, but I know lots of things that can't be done on Windows. And don't mention 3rd party software, because there's also some 3rd party software unavailable for Windows (Apple Shake, for example, is only available for Linux and OSX) - that's up to the vendor, and has next to nothing to do with the OS.

  Quote
You can't get ahead if you have yet to catch up...

Care to elaborate?

  mr_demilord said:
Hardware support is great!

Even my cheapass scanner works with linux.

what hardware did not work?

please be specific.

Maybe it works out of the box , but that you have to edit a config file.

586416229[/snapback]

TV tuner support is horrible.

All in wonder's dont work!

Gyration Keyboard/mouse support = non existant!

Biometric security support = non existant.

Winmodem support = horrible!

USB WiFi support = horrible...

Need me to keep going?

Smoke,

what TV tuners don't work? AiW's are supported, check GATOS[1]. Gyration stuff should work out of the box[2], if it doesn't, you'll only need to configure the hardware properly. Biometry support is available[3], but not for all devices (granted - blame the vendors). WinModems are a POS, any Hayes AT modem is cheaper, works better, they are all supported, and they are more efficient. Anyway, most WinModems do work[4], even though the driver may be commercial closed source software (LinuxAnt)[5]. And USB WiFi just works on most recent distros, may need LinuxAnt drivers[6] or NDISWrapper[7], but that's the users fault for not buying properly supported hardware in the first place. Still, they work, so who cares...

[1]: http://gatos.sourceforge.net/supported_cards.php

[2]: Quote from http://www.gyration.com/intl/uk/testimonials_uk.htm :"Fantastic product hope you sell millions, you have my vote, and for you Linux users this is the best key board I have ever used even better than the little Linux keyer."

[3]: http://linuxbiometrics.com/

[4]: http://linmodems.org/

[5]: http://www.linuxant.com/drivers/

[6]: http://www.linuxant.com/driverloader/

[7]: http://ndiswrapper.sourceforge.net/

  LaNcom said:
Smoke,

what TV tuners don't work? AiW's are supported, check GATOS[1]. Gyration stuff should work out of the box[2], if it doesn't, you'll only need to configure the hardware properly. Biometry support is available[3], but not for all devices (granted - blame the vendors). WinModems are a POS, any Hayes AT modem is cheaper, works better, they are all supported, and they are more efficient. Anyway, most WinModems do work[4], even though the driver may be commercial closed source software (LinuxAnt)[5]. And USB WiFi just works on most recent distros, may need LinuxAnt drivers[6] or NDISWrapper[7], but that's the users fault for not buying properly supported hardware in the first place. Still, they work, so who cares...

[1]: http://gatos.sourceforge.net/supported_cards.php

[2]: Quote from http://www.gyration.com/intl/uk/testimonials_uk.htm :"Fantastic product hope you sell millions, you have my vote, and for you Linux users this is the best key board I have ever used even better than the little Linux keyer."

[3]: http://linuxbiometrics.com/

[4]: http://linmodems.org/

[5]: http://www.linuxant.com/drivers/

[6]: http://www.linuxant.com/driverloader/

[7]: http://ndiswrapper.sourceforge.net/

586416426[/snapback]

No, i know for a fact that the gyration keyboard suite doesn't work with linux... There may be a version that does, but the one i used to have never ever did. I had my college professors try to configure it, and they couldn't...

I agree that most issues are the fault of the vendor, but it still affects the OS's hardware support... Regardless of who's fault it is, it still doesn't support the hardware...

My old AIW 9700 pro never ever worked with linux... i tried everything...

  CaKeY said:
Does windows support those devices out of the box without 3rd party drivers?

586416281[/snapback]

The gyration keyboard suite worked in windows out of the box since windows 98...

There are no drivers (besides the standard mouse and keyboard drivers windows uses)

yes you can use webcams on linux, it depends on the chipset that the cam uses. my quickcam pro 4000 dosnt work properly with suse 9.3pro

but if you look around the net you will find some good support sites. http://www.linuxquestions.org/ is a good place.

http://rpm.pbone.net/ is good for getting packages for your chosen distro.

and http://linux01.gwdg.de/~pbleser/ if you are a suse user is good as well.

Smoke,

well, either you tried the Gyration stuff on Linux 0.99, or on a b0rked distro, or even your professors were quite clueless - I know for fact that everything Gyration built works on Linux. Anyway, like I said, pretty much every piece of hardware you listed does work, I'm sorry if it didn't work for you. And the 9700 is explicitly listed as supported on the GATOS page, so I'm sure you didn't try everything...

BTW, do you expect OSX, SUN, or sgi hardware to work on Windows? I didn't think so... :-)

  Quote
Winmodem support = horrible!

Ever wondered why they are called winmodems? I'm sure if they made linmodems the windows' support for them would be rubbish.

Anyhoo, the fault for lack of hardware support is not the fault of linux. It's the fault of the product vendors for not making their products work in anything other than windows. Linux does however have more generic drivers than windows. It will recognise most devices as what they are. Eg, in Windows, it detects my digital camera as a USB Mass Storage device. In linux it gets every detail right down to the model number - using generic drivers in both windows and linux.

the only problem that I had making the switch was sound, but with enough reading I got it working. I blame the vendor for my sound problem, because their drivers support an older sound system, however, the generic drivers I'm using now completely detected my onboard sound, and they work like a charm.

Windows only has good hardware support because hardware vendors support it. This is starting to change, and you can see that in Nvidia and ATI. I read somewhere very recently ATI expanded their Linux driver team very recently, to improve their Linux support.

  MGS3-SS said:
[..] you are just too dumb to know how to set up your own hardware.

586417598[/snapback]

There is no need to start down the road of personal insults here. :crazy:
  Tomo said:
It's not that Linux lacks in hardware support, its the manufacturers cannot be arsed to support their hardware! It's not the fault of Linux!

586417612[/snapback]

While I agree that it isn't Linux's fault, it is, however, tied directly people's experience with Linux. While Linux does support a huge array of hardware, it is the Windows-based consumer pieces that cause problems. You can argue that there is better overall support for all hardware in Linux, but if user xyz's DSL adapter gizmo isn't supported, it is a problem for that user. Even if it is supported with a 10-step series of commands and downloads at the command line, the new user is going to have some serious concern about their ability to configure and use Linux.

This is an area of improvement (whether Linux leads Windows in hardware or whether they trail Windows).

I do agree with the thread title. First it was the installer not recognizing my hdd because it was in SATA mode. Then it was not recognizing my video card until I booted in VGA 4bit color mode and downloaded the NVIDIA drivers. Then it was the 50 steps I had to take to get my Live! 24-bit soundcard to work.

It's just so much easier in Windows.

  dueY said:
Then it was not recognizing my video card until I booted in VGA 4bit color mode and downloaded the NVIDIA drivers.

586417978[/snapback]

While I agree that there are areas where Linux detection and automatic installation could improve, I find it nearly impossible for an nVidia card to not work with the default open source "nv" drivers included with every standard distro, and require setup in some bizarre 4-bit mode. :blink:

(by the way, commercial distros can include the propriatary drivers that 'free' releases cannot, so Linspire and others will auto-detect and run propriatary video and wireless that require extra steps on 'free' versions).

  dueY said:
I do agree with the thread title.  First it was the installer not recognizing my hdd because it was in SATA mode.

Except you have to insert a fscking floppy disk during XP installation for it to recognize even the most basic SATA drives. I haven't had a floppy disk in my computer for AGES.

Vista amazingly supports loading drivers from a CD. Amazing, such progress.

Oh wait, no it's not. :no:

  daPhoenix said:
Except you have to insert a fscking floppy disk during XP installation for it to recognize even the most basic SATA drives. I haven't had a floppy disk in my computer for AGES.

Vista amazingly supports loading drivers from a CD. Amazing, such progress.

Oh wait, no it's not. :no:

586419318[/snapback]

I didn't need a floppy to install Windows. I don't even have a floppy drive.

And the nv drivers didn't work for my 6800, that was one of the first things I tried.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD Ryzen 9600X 6-core AM5 CPU is just $185 and you get a free 512GB NVMe SSD too by Sayan Sen If you are on AMD's AM4 socket or older Intel and are looking to upgrade your processor, AMD has the Ryzen 9600X for just $185 (purchase link down below), plus you get a free NVMe SSD as well. The deal comes hot on the heels of Intel also offering the Core i5-14600K for as low as just $200, which includes a 240 mm AIO liquid cooler. Check that deal out in this article if you want to go Team Blue. The AMD Ryzen 9600X is based on the latest Zen 5 design and is the company's best chip to date. This desktop CPU has six cores and 12 threads; it competes with Intel's 12th Gen i7 for productivity performance, and is almost as good as the 14th Gen i7 for gaming. The SKU does not include a cooler and so you will need to buy one separately. The technical specifications of the Ryzen 5 9600X are given below: Architecture: Zen 5 Process Technology: TSMC 4nm FinFET manufacturing process Core Count: 6 cores Thread Count: 12 threads Base Clock Frequency: 3.9 GHz Max Boost Clock Frequency: 5.4 GHz Total Cache: 6 MB + 32 MB (L2 + L3) Thermal Design Power (TDP): 65W PCI Express Version: PCIe 5.0 28 lanes (usable: 24) Overclocking: Unlocked for overclocking TjMax: 95 C Platform Socket: AM5 Memory capacity support: max 192 GB DDR5 Memory Speed: 2x1R DDR5-5600, 2x2R DDR5-5600, 4x1R DDR5-3600, 4x2R DDR5-3600 Get it at the links below: AMD Ryzen 5 9600X (includes Radeon 2CU Integrated Graphics) - 100-100001405WOF: $184.99 (Shipped and Sold by Amazon US) | $189.99 (Shipped and Sold by Newegg US + free 512 GB NVMe SSD) This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the Amazon US deals page here. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Hello, The general things are to make sure you have all of the latest Windows Updates installed as well as various device drivers for the computer's hardware components (video card, storage devices, etc.), as these can make a difference.  It might be small differences, but they can add up.  Case in point:  I was reading a while back about how in Windows 11 when you right-click on an object in File Explorer to bring up the context menu, it first enables to 3-D acceleration… to display a menu with text and maybe some 2-D icons.  Such behavior slows down the display of the context menu slightly.  If (and/or when) this gets fixed in Windows 11, context menus in File Explorer will appear much snappier. A few things you can try, in no particular order: Try toggling the full screen view of File Explorer on and off by pressing the F11 key twice.  This fixes another (different) bug like the one I mentioned above with Windows.  I don't recall if it has been fixed yet. Open the File Explorer, and look at the Panes section.  Click on the Navigation Pane button, and uncheck all of the options you do not need, like Navigation Pane, Show all folders, Show This PC, Show Network and Show Libraries.  You can also deselect (uncheck) the Preview pane and Details pane. In the Layout section, change the viewing option to either List or Details. if you use the Quick Access section in the left pane of the File Explorer, unpin (remove) any mappings to network drives, plus anything else you do not need or regularly access.  If you do not use it at all, consider unpinning everything there. In the File Explorer, select File → Options to bring up the Folder Options dialog and make the following changes: On the General tab, set Open File Explorer to This PC and below it in the Privacy section, uncheck the various Show… options and click on the Clear button. On the View tab, check the Always show icons, never thumbnails and the Launch folder windows in a separate process options.  Also on the View tab, uncheck the Display file size information in folder tips, Display the full path in the title bar, Restore previous folder windows at logon, Show preview handlers in preview pane and all of the options in the Navigation pane section. On the Search tab, scroll down the the When searching non-indexed locations section, and uncheck all of the items. Go to Settings → Network & internet → Advanced network settings → Advanced sharing settings and select the Private networks section.  In there, set Network discovery to On, enable (check) Set up network connected devices automatically, and set File and printer sharing to On.  Do not make any changes to the Public networks or All networks sections. Go to Settings → Privacy & security → Searching Windows and in the Find my files section, select (check) the Classic option.   Under the Classic option, select the Customize search locations option.  The Indexing Options window will appear.  Click on the Modify button to show the Indexed Locations window.  Click on the Show all locations button.  In the Change selection locations section at the top, remove any entries that say ""This location is currently unavailable" in them. Go back to the Indexing Options window, and click on the Advanced button.  The Advanced Options window will appear.  On the Index Settings tab, click the Rebuild tab. Other things to consider:  If you upgraded from Windows 10 to Windows 11 and/or cloned your boot drive (from a HDD to a SSD or a SSD to another SSD), wiping it and performing a clean installation of Windows 11 may improve performance, as legacy settings from the older hardware will no longer be in place.  If you are still using a hard disk drive, upgrading to a solid state drive will provide a noticeable performance improvement to all operations that involve accessing the drive. You can also try using third-party replacements for the Start Menu (Start 11, StartAllBack, etc.) and/or Windows File Explorer (Directory Opus, Double Commander, Explorer++, Files, FAR, Free Commander, Midnight Commander, Q-Dir, Total Commander, XYplorer ,etc.) to see if those perform better for you than Windows stock versions.  I don't think changing the antivirus software would have any effect, but it is something you could try as well, just to see if it does make any difference. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • I think it's bloody great, old chap!
    • Not the deal that 2nd hand purchasers tend to look for - no.  It's cheaper than the sum of it's parts new - yes.  But people looking for 2nd hand, pre-built computers are rarely looking for what you are selling. Don't misunderstand; as an informed enthusiast I like that computer, and as an informed enthusiast I am often asked "My son wants a gaming PC and here's my budget" - in which case, as an informed enthusiast I would totally point them in this sort of direction.  But I am not the mass market, hence you may well have to wait longer for a sale. If you're looking for speed - then breaking it into parts is likely to pay off better on that front, as there will be more people who suit that market and their likelihood of buying 2nd hand is more fruitful.  But - chore!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      elsafaacompany earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Yianis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Veteran
      Travesty went up a rank
      Veteran
    • One Month Later
      somar86 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      somar86 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      260
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      186
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      177
    5. 5
      snowy owl
      132
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!