Have you met anyone on the internet?


  

84 members have voted

  1. 1. Have you met anyone on the internet?

    • Yes
      58
    • No
      26


Recommended Posts

I met one girl but a friend of mine knew he in real life so that doesn't count.

I met up with this other guy I met with because he was in a clan I was in a long time ago, but still talk to him a lot. I met up with him one day when he was in Toronto with a friend of mine that knew him from the game too. Real nice guy, we just hung out for the day.

I've also met a couple other guys that I played games with that live by my school, good friends with them now.

I, too, have met many people online, it's great fun, although somewhat scary meeting someone for the first time with them knowing so much about you.

On that note, I too, have an online relationship, although I hate calling it that, since online relationship comes with so many stereotypes tacked on to it, and the relationship we have is so strong and powerful that to put it down to a stereotype is just insulting. I love her so much, I'm going up to the USA next year to be with her, and if things work out, she's going to move down to Australia with me.

So, short answer, yes. ;)

Originally posted by Wickedkitten

why do people keep going on with this "real life" crap? It's either online or offline unless you're one of those sad ****s that's into "internet personas"

Yes. One would think the thread title was obvious enough...

Anywho i was just thinking. Is the distance for you people ever a problem? I am certain it is, and it is likely more an issue for some of you. Does it complicate the relationship at all?

For myself, me and my ladyfriend live quite far apart. Australia - USA. Sometimes when we are both chatting long hours into the night, and not being able to hold her can be difficult at times. And when i know she is upset and hurting this is even worse. I often think that if i could just hold her, any troubles she or myself may have, would just fly away. Calling her helps alot, and sometimes, often infact we can talk for hours at a time. Nevermind the phone bill ;)

The people that made mention you met each other in the same town, or one just across from you, i envy you. I really do. You cannot imagine the pain, and hurt of being separated by atleast 3000 miles. Even a 1000 would be far more preferable.

Why do i endure it? Because the happiness she has brought to my life far outweighs the pain of being separated and is a sacrifice i willingly accept. Besides, it is a temporay nuance and will not always be this way. I believe i have met someone truly special and not even an ocean will keep us separated in the end;)

God damn i am sappy tonite...:paranoid:

Originally posted by Keldyn

Yes. One would think the thread title was obvious enough...

Anywho i was just thinking. Is the distance for you people ever a problem? I am certain it is, and it is likely more an issue for some of you. Does it complicate the relationship at all?

For myself, me and my ladyfriend live quite far apart. Australia - USA. Sometimes when we are both chatting long hours into the night, and not being able to touch, or hold her can be difficult at times. And when i know she is upset and hurting this is even worse. When words are the only comfort you have, linked together through a computer, sometimes it is not always enough. I often think that if i could just hold her, any troubles she or myself may have, would just fly away.

The people that made mention you met each other in the same town, or one just across from you, i envy you. I really do. You cannot imagine the pain, and hurt of being separated by atleast 3000 miles. Even a 1000 would be far more preferable.

Why do i endure it? Because the happiness she has brought to my life far outweighs the pain of being separated and is a sacrifice i willingly accept. Besides, it is a temporay nuance and will not always be this way. I believe i have met someone truly special and not even an ocean will keep us separated in the end;)

God damn i am sappy tonite...:paranoid:

I can definately relate to what you are saying, the distance is really hard, but as the saying goes - love conquers all. And me and Laura (that's her name!) don't plan to be seperated by the sea for long. What really helps though is talking on the phone, and with phonecards rating at 4.5 cents per minute to the USA, it isnt hard to call. :D

Originally posted by Keldyn

Yes. One would think the thread title was obvious enough...

Anywho i was just thinking. Is the distance for you people ever a problem? I am certain it is, and it is likely more an issue for some of you. Does it complicate the relationship at all?

For myself, me and my ladyfriend live quite far apart. Australia - USA. Sometimes when we are both chatting long hours into the night, and not being able to hold her can be difficult at times. And when i know she is upset and hurting this is even worse. I often think that if i could just hold her, any troubles she or myself may have, would just fly away. Calling her helps alot, and sometimes, often infact we can talk for hours at a time. Nevermind the phone bill ;)

The people that made mention you met each other in the same town, or one just across from you, i envy you. I really do. You cannot imagine the pain, and hurt of being separated by atleast 3000 miles. Even a 1000 would be far more preferable.

Why do i endure it? Because the happiness she has brought to my life far outweighs the pain of being separated and is a sacrifice i willingly accept. Besides, it is a temporay nuance and will not always be this way. I believe i have met someone truly special and not even an ocean will keep us separated in the end;)

God damn i am sappy tonite...:paranoid:

I know exactly what ya mean

btw instead of running up phonebills why don't you both just get a headset microphone and talk over netmeeting?

Originally posted by Wickedkitten

I know exactly what ya mean

btw instead of running up phonebills why don't you both just get a headset microphone and talk over netmeeting?

Well, that's why I use phonecards, it doesn't come up on the bill, it's pre-paid. There's something to be said about being able to talk on the phone, you know, taking the cordless phone around my home and such, being able to hop into bed or go outside, etc. Also, we're both on 28.8 connections, so it's very laggy on netmeeting!

yeah, distance really sucks. you can't just see the person whenever you want, or just for the heck of it. :/

the only good part is that i get to visit california a couple times a year. :) my gf and i are planning on living together soon though, so i will be much happier then.

to me, meeting someone online is just as random as meeting someone at a bar or wherever. and why limit yourself to people who live in your city or town? think about how narrow that is. there are amazing people all over the world, and if you are traditional, you are going to only expose yourself to .01% of them.

I've met a few people from the online world. Most of the time it's been a good experience, a few times there are those weird people who you just want to make go away after spending a good 5 minutes with.

The man I'm currently dating now, I met online over 2 years ago. I didn't start dating him until almost a year ago, which is a good thing, because had I started when I first met him, he was one of those people I mentioned above, the type of guy you want to stab with a steakknife when they've asked for the 100th time where the bathroom is in Wal-Mart when it's clearly marked "Restrooms". He's gotten smarter, and now only asks when we first enter the Supercenter.

Theres a possibility the next person I meet (looks at Wickedkitten and unspec) could turn out to be murderours, if over 1 month goes by and I don't post at Neowin, theres been a problem involving my living. Please see Wickedkitten about it. ;)

--dave

Originally posted by Wickedkitten

I know exactly what ya mean

btw instead of running up phonebills why don't you both just get a headset microphone and talk over netmeeting?

Oh sometimes we do just that. I don't know but it is never quite the same. It never feels as "personal" as using the telephone. I guess because you are still seated at front of the computer... . When we chat over the phone, i forget all about that. I can just close my eyes and listen to her voice...;)

Originally posted by BananaMan

I can definately relate to what you are saying, the distance is really hard, but as the saying goes - love conquers all. And me and Laura (that's her name!) don't plan to be seperated by the sea for long. What really helps though is talking on the phone, and with phonecards rating at 4.5 cents per minute to the USA, it isnt hard to call. :D

Best of luck to you both. It can be rough at times, but the heartache of being separated is a small price to pay in the end. Hang in there mate.

Originally posted by L33T P3NIS

btw mr hkey over here is the reason why i have l33t in my name, :D

Indeed. I can't believe I ever seperated from you Mr P3nis, but you went and got too l33t for me. :ponder:

If you ever come back to Missouri, I'll take you back...and your P3nis too.

--dave

Originally posted by Keldyn

Best of luck to you both. It can be rough at times, but the heartache of being separated is a small price to pay in the end. Hang in there mate.

Hey, thanks buddy, and yes, you're quite right, I know it will be worth it a million times over in the end. Best of luck to you and your significiant other as well, I'm sure it'll go wondefully, [suckup] how could she resist the charm of the l33t mover. Bwhaha! [/suckup] :p ;)

Thanks again for your best wishes, it really is appreciated.

I've met a few people on the Internet and then gone on to meet them in-person. The majority of them have been people I coversed with online and then became "friends" with, and in fact many of us are good friends now that get together every so often.

The best story though is that I met my now lovely wife on the Internet... well AOL to be exact (all praises due to the sh*tty ISP that introduced me to my wife). I had just moved out to Oklahoma from Florida and really didn't know that many people. Anyways my dad (whom I stayed with for a couple months while I found an apartment) let me setup an user account on his AOL account so I could get online, mainly to e-mail my friends back home and such. Well one day I get this IM from this girl who apparently lives in the same town as I did (in OK). We talked off and on (in IM) for a few months, and then on the phone. At some point we decided to meet in person at one of the local clubs, had a good time and decided to start "dating" (more as in hanging out than the other). Eventually things got serious and later down the road we got engaged and then married.

As far as the long-distance issue being discussed, I tried that with my ex for awhile... just didn't work out, of course I think it was mainly because she resented my moving away (even if it was for the best, at least for me). Then again she did meet some guy online, move clear across the country to meet him and get married :ermm: I think she got divorced though and move back home.

Originally posted by hkey_root

Indeed. I can't believe I ever seperated from you Mr P3nis, but you went and got too l33t for me. :ponder:

If you ever come back to Missouri, I'll take you back...and your P3nis too.

--dave

YO! Sushi. I ate unspec's yo! sushi today, first time I ever had sushi and boy was it tasty.

wasabi burns though

Originally posted by hkey_root

If I didn't know EXACTLY what you were talking about, I would be completely confused by that post Cathy.

--dave

well since Ross and I plan on going to Hong Kong and Japan for 2 weeks for the honeymoon I figured I might as well at least try sushi seeing as how he forgot to take it for his lunch.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I grew up a Star Trek fan and never watched Star Wars movies. To this days I've not watched most Star Wras movies. As a result I rarely get these references, I have no idea what this post means. Given the popular reactions these get I have to accept I missed out.  
    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!