Age of Empires 3 Demo is OUT!


Recommended Posts

I wrote a short review here: http://istartedsomething.blogspot.com/2005...3-demo-out.html

Here's a snippet

However, the most unimpressive part of the game is its menu system. When I was first introduced to the game, without a tutorial that is, I was basically frustrated by not knowing what is going on. All the graphical commands and buttons are so vague that I would have not guessed the functions of half of them without looking at the tooltip. I admit it will be familiarised in the long run, but I've seen other games do a much better job of providing an easier to understand menu system.

has anyone came up with a fix for the bluescreen at startup yet? mines like this: once i click the accept for the lisence agreement it starts to load where it says AOE III and then the screen just turns blue, no stop error or nothing. i checked the log file but its empty. to those wondering where this is its in my documents/my games

im running latest ati/nforce2/soundblaster x-fi drivers/everything else. my cpu isnt 64 bit so i dont think this is a 64 bit only problem. the only thing i was running when i tried to start it was MS antispyware, maybe that has something to do with it, did anyone else have this running at the time of crashing?

OH MY GOODNESS... what a friggin dissappointment. i was waiting for this for AGES (npi). and now it comes out and its just busted my coconuts. i think the gameplay SUCKS. the graphics were also so-o hyped up and selective screenshots given, but it sucks... maybe its just my 6600GT, but i bet NOT.

(EDIT)

I AM USING LARGE TEXT TO GET YOUR ATTENTION: THIS GAME SUCKS... COMPARABLE TO AOM

Edited by a_witko

I find it all almost unplayable becasue of the poor scrolling. In command and conquer games including generals you could scroll by holding down the right mouse button and moving it but I can't find any option in this demo to do that. The only way to scroll is put the mouse to the edge of the screen and I just can't control it. It hesitates for a moments when I put my mouse there and then goes really fast and I just cant move the view to where I want it to be. Put in a command and conquer style scroll and i'll be able to play it.

Unfortunately you are not able to save the game during play, which made me unsitall it instantly. I'm pretty dissapointed about that. I don't know why they have omitted a savegame feature in the demo; maby you will get to much of the game if you were able to save, which make me think that the game is NOT very big. I was looking forward to this game, but now with that omission, i will most likely not be buying it unfortunately.

I have to agree with many who have posted here. Unit control is not easy, instead of being individual units they could have been grouped together or something. The first thing that struck me was the huge GUI, I got used to it after some time but it really could have been a lot smaller. On the other hand as people have pointed out, building destruction was cool, as were the sound effects and graphics - but these are only superficial things in my opinion.

Unfortunately the demo did not make me think positively of this game. :(

I'm shocked how my crappy mx400 32mb played this fine and a lot of you guys with high end cards can't even get it to run :D  The irony :D

586495784[/snapback]

Very sad :cry:

But instead of getting mad I'll just laugh at the fact that I paid $500 for the latest, greatest video card that doesn't work :pinch: :laugh:

i got a kick out this demo version when i loaded it up. it said my graphics "64mb intel extreme graphics" card wasn't support, but when i clicked on run anyways. it loaded up fine and everything. the game even played pretty good. So i can't really wait for the final version of it to come out because i think it'll be alot better then what it is now.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • it dosnt support onprem exchange. it dosnt support mapi-calls. the views are all worse/limited. its slower. it cant see public folder calendars. we already have webmail. the list of other missing features is pretty huge but i only see it when customers call to say their email isnt working, and 9/10 times its cause they accidentality changed to outlooknew(new). Hold the line everyone!
    • yeah, this looks beautiful. Damn this winter's going to be great.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!