Age of Empires 3 Demo is OUT!


Recommended Posts

ive already said this game sucks, but i guess i should state exactly why... i guess its not fair by just saying so.

* scrolling is awful - 'right-mouse-button-held + direction' is a much better idea and more user friendly

* some grass (autumn) has too many colours and it is hard to distinguish units.

* zoom in + out is very limited.. should have a far zoom out and close zoom in.

* user panel is MUCH too large and limits what you see... makes player feel claustrophobic (sp?)

* graphics look poor with everything on highest even on my 6600GT -they cant expect everyone to own 7800Ultras.

* 3d structure of buildings extremely poor - simple boxes with rooves and textures to cover. AOM standard.

* no saving

* graphics customization poor - no exact choice of AA etc.. (4x, 8x etc)

* no keyboard control options...

* NO CAMERA ROTATION/ANGLE CONTROL???

* population information display???

* NO LEARN TO PLAY IN DEMO!!!!!

* poor maps... in advertised screenshots, maps look complex and natural, but demo displays 'just water, grass and trees' maps... (compare here AOE3-SS and ss below)

* ++ many more things i cant remember..

* POOR GAMEPLAY - unit handling, smoothness of gameplay etc.

the only thing which passes my graphics test is maybe the sunset reflections on water. but even that is limited in a way.

post-35556-1126246035_thumb.jpg

never played AOEI&II... excuse me, im the BIGGEST FAN of AOEII and i think it superseeds AOEIII by 100x - no doubt in that.

AOEII is a timeless classic. AOEIII is AOEII on a poor 3d engine with outlaws instead of wolves and cows in addition to sheep.

Take the Age of Empires III Survey if you have some time, questions 14 onwards are about our opinion on the demo.

http://www.microsoft.com/games/age3/survey/

586498459[/snapback]

Thanks for the link. Filled out survey. Made it quite clear that AOEIII is [poop]

disgusting image edited out by moderator

AT 1st GLANCE (it is a demo) it seems very very similar to AOEII. Just like when AOEII came out it seemed very very similar to AOEI and when AOM came out it seemed very very similar to AOEII.

I don't think this is a bad thing as I loved all 3 games prior to this one and enjoyed the demo in much the same way. If you were expecting some revolution in the game engine then poor you but from the screenies prior to the demo release i wasn't expecting much to be different as the same over-hype appeared when AOM was announced, high-res screenies and muchos excitement about how great it was gonna be. When it came out many people were disapointed.

RTS games have evolved, more so than ever in the last few years. Personally i preffer the old school such as AOEI & II and am enjoying the demo to it's fullest and will be buying the game on it's release as the demo has done it's job and shown me that they have not ditched their style to try and fit in with recent releases.

Anybody having mouse issues?

586498774[/snapback]

nope no mouse issues.

oh and btw guys and gals ... this is just a demo, the game isn't finished yet. i hope they put that option from aom where u could remove the UI altogether tho :-)

oh and btw, for those who would want to zoom a lil more out (buildings are quite BIIG) should

1.) Find the game.cfg file - it should be in Age of Empires 3 Trial/StartUp/game.cfg:

2.) Select it, right click on it and select properties:

3.) Uncheck the "Read-Only" box, then click OK:

4.) Make a copy of the file for backup, just in case the file gets messed up

5.) Now, open the file in your favorite text editor. If you don't have one, use Notepad. Find the line that says "MaxZoom=60", and change it to read "MaxZoom=120" (the higher the number, the more you can zoom out... try not to go too high?

source: http://aoe3.heavengames.com/cgi-bin/forums...=1,23534,120,60

btw: here i am working on a gf4-ti4600, full settings and runs VERY smoothly at 1280x960 (even tho all those bells and whistles of HDR are not enabled)

everytime i play the game it freezes on the screen it says played best on pentium 4 or soemthin....i got an amd 1800+xp ati radeon 128ddr latest drivers 256ddr ram...is it my comp that sux or somethin else?

Why are people moaning so much? Be pleased with something for once.

I enjoyed the demo, the people who hate it obviously are the ones who never played AOEI&II.

586498530[/snapback]

"Moaning" is what differentiates good games from bad games. It's called, preference. It's also called, "I thought this game would be decent (and could at least run on an ATI card) after it getting pumped up by everyone and his dog."

I played it on my friends computer, and the game is just average, no where near as fun as i thought it would be. I'd just rather play AOM or AOEII:TC

"Why are people moaning so much? Be pleased with something for once.

I enjoyed the demo, the people who hate it obviously are the ones who never played AOEI&II."

Not exactly. I never played any AoE

Im a fan of AoM and i liked it too, kinda boring and the UI is huge the graphics sucks... etc.

But this is Demo 1.0 and things are gonna be fixed till retail version, of that im sure.

I've only played it a little so far. I agree it's not exactly that different from previous games - and the HUD is way too big for my liking.

Those fragments being blown off buildings look really cool though, and the water reflections are not bad. :)

I have played two games of 89 Minutes yeah quite curious they lasted the exact same time.

First i lost and in the second i owned them.

I only played the english tho gotta try the spanish.

Why dont they have Portuguese in the demo... damn it was the first conquering not England and Spain it should be on demo!!!11!1onehundredandeleven

Played it again and i am just starting to like it.

But i f'ing hate the limit on how many bulidings i can have such as 7 guard towers. and 20 houses, This sucks i think.

Graphics aren't that bad but units look to much the same.

I haven't played AGE II many times because i never ahd it but a friend did.

But if it get improved i will buy it. Because it suck a fun game i can spend hours on

The AI seems kind of simple minded; all they do is rush you in little groups again and again, right from the start of the game. I barely have time to get anything built before they wipe me out, but once I get defenses in place there is nothing to it. Goes from being too hard to being too easy. :no:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!