Age of Empires 3 Demo is OUT!


Recommended Posts

But i f'ing hate the limit on how many bulidings i can have such as 7 guard towers. and 20 houses, This sucks i think.

586499690[/snapback]

yea thats how i lost the first mission... then the 2nd time around i just beat the crap outta the other army then build the trading posts....

i think the game is alright works pretty good... i checked the release date its oct 25 thats pretty far i thought it be sooner but i guess they still have some bugs to work out....

Edited by Mystical112
i* scrolling is awful - 'right-mouse-button-held + direction' is a much better idea and more user friendly

I'm glad somebody agrees with me. I couldn't play the demo at all becasue of the awful scrolling. Putting the mouse to the edge of the screen makes it race past where I wanted it to go before I can even think about what has happened. Then trying to go back it goes even further the other way. There is no way to control the speed of the scroll and it takes a massive movement of the mouse to get it to change direction. If it had right mouse + direction style, I would actually be able to play it and might have even liked it.

Actually you can adjust the scrolling speed in the options menu. It's very touchy right now though, I hope they fix it. I read on another forum that Ensemble has fixed over 600 bugs and have shrinked the interface a bit, so maybe by the time it's in stores it won't be so bad.

well so far i think the demo is CLASS.

at first i was disapointed how the graphics look no way as good as they do on screenshots.. and i do have everything on MAX.

anyways i've managed to spend 10 hours today playing just 2 skirmish games :D

I don't know what everyone is complaining about. I think the game is totally awesome. The way the building explode, guys get blown up by the cannons and roll into the water. Of course there are a few minor bugs to fix(most importantly is the unit control). I cannot wait until the game is released to the masses. I think everyone is a little to critical of a DEMO version, of course there are alot of features that are not in the demo it just makes you want the full and final version more. Patients people it will all work out :)

everyone who has an ATI card has that problem, it's quite rediculous really

586499176[/snapback]

Er what? I have an ATI card...

I find it all almost unplayable becasue of the poor scrolling. In command and conquer games including generals...

586494854[/snapback]

I agree about the scrolling being a little bit weird too - but you can change the scroll speed of course. I especially know what you mean with regard to Generals... so I think it's more just missing that feature than the scrolling being "bad".

Are you smoking crack??? Can I have some????

Geez, update your video card from that Monster PCI you have!  :rolleyes:  :whistle:

586500551[/snapback]

if im correct he has an x850 :unsure: i dont think he needs to update..

and the game doesnt ever run here stupid B&W textures ?

the menu is a solid white background :sleep:

Also the sounds at the moment sound GREAT.

got 2 big ships that can bomb buldings. the sound they make shakes my room.

And when i shoot cannons at buldings, you do see bits fall off them and the great thing is it's like got a slight delay like you would see in the movies.

Thats a great part of the game i like :D

i tried the demo

huge disapoitment

it looks about the same as AOEII

glad i got mine Earth 2160, because i won't waste anytime playing this AOEIII garbage

586500407[/snapback]

I can't completely agree with you about it looking the same as AOEII, however, I do agree that this is a huge disappointment though. The graphics don't seem anything like what the videos and screenshots that have been touted by Microsoft/Ensemble Studios. AOM was the exact same way, awesome graphics in the videos and screenshots, but huge disappointment when it was finally released.

I have a BFG nVidia 7800GTX OC and the graphics are really bad compared to what the videos I've seen show.

I personally have canceled my order from Amazon.com and I encourage everyone else to do the same, let's send a message to Microsoft that we won't stand for this anymore :crazy:

[EDIT] I wonder if it is possible that this was released to the general public in a beta condition. I mean, look, it is only September and the game isn't being released until the middle of October (October 18). How many other games have been released more then a month ahead of the game? As far as I know, not many... except for public previews (beta condition). Maybe it's just me :/

I can't completely agree with you about it looking the same as AOEII, however, I do agree that this is a huge disappointment though. The graphics don't seem anything like what the videos and screenshots that have been touted by Microsoft/Ensemble Studios. AOM was the exact same way, awesome graphics in the videos and screenshots, but huge disappointment when it was finally released.

I have a BFG nVidia 7800GTX OC and the graphics are really bad compared to what the videos I've seen show.

I personally have canceled my order from Amazon.com and I encourage everyone else to do the same, let's send a message to Microsoft that we won't stand for this anymore :crazy:

[EDIT] I wonder if it is possible that this was released to the general public in a beta condition. I mean, look, it is only September and the game isn't being released until the middle of October (October 18). How many other games have been released more then a month ahead of the game? As far as I know, not many... except for public previews (beta condition). Maybe it's just me :/

586502312[/snapback]

no the graphics actually got better once I compared them

I dont know what you did but when you jack up the quality settings on the nvidia drivers (same with the ati drivers) the true quality shines :) and its exactly the same as the screenshots earlier.

edit: compare this with this

actually, look at this screenshot instead.

things to note in the comparisons:

  1. I was using vista, so the quality settings were not touch(ed/able)/adjust(ed/able).
  2. My card is a 5700 ultra, so some things may be lacking by default
  3. The game supports HDR but it is turned off by default (Help & Tools >> Options >> Graphics Options >> Bloom Effect) (turn it on and im positive the screenshots will match in terms of quality
  4. Water reflections from this angle are poor. While in-game, water reflections improve drastically :)

Edited by GCNaddict

well it seems I cant edit my old post anymore. Here's a shot of the water compared to the water microsoft showed off 4 months earlier.

The polygon counts of everything seem to be relatively similar. If I had a warship (called a monitor) built, then I would have shown to you that the polygon counts are the same. Also, the water quality is exactly the same :)

Edited by GCNaddict

I honestly don't know what you people are talking about. The game has some flaws, yes, but why is everybody getting so overworked about it. I was a huge fan of AOE and AOEII. My favorite RTS ever. I mean really the only other RTS's I've enjoyed are Starcraft, Warcraft, and RON.

Now lets not forget it is a demo. The game hasn't even gone gold yet. I have a 9800XT with Catalyst 5.8 and the game runs glorious at 1280x960 with high details, except for FSAA on. The gameplay is everything I hoped it would be, being as AOM was a little disappointing for me. I think it's more along the lines of AOEII gameplay.

And whats wrong with the graphics, I think they look amazing. The units have good characteristics, and even emotionally cheer as in BFME. Which is kinda cool. The buildings do not look like blocks with bad textures. The only thing I could remotely agree with any of you on is that the UI in-game is a little big. And few of the other minor flaws. I can't wait for the retail product though. I don't think the scrolling is that much of an issue, I think that BFME was worse in scrolling, imho.

All in all, yeah, was expecting a little better product, but I can deal. It's fun, new and gets me jazzed. Maybe I'm stupid, but maybe I can look past the minor bugs and concentrate on the goal of AOEIII. And focus on a game that needs a little improvement, but those aren't gonna stop me from having a good time.

Some screens...

Main Screen - Looks very nice to me.

City - Notice the water reflections and steam in various locations. It's zoomed out pretty far, but still looks pretty nice to me.

Victory - Notice the Mill getting blown up, with the pieces of it flying off with shadows. Also the birds and their shadows, and the foilage around the water lines. Seems pretty nice to me.

Good to see a few more positive views in this thread since my last post... I think it's a great game and will also be buying it when it comes out, as it'll only get better.

These people don't seem to have any faith in a company that has delivered some of the best RTS games ever made.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
    • Yes, I actually glossed over the Linux part from the OP. You could always go for a 9070 XT and if you really want to play Ray Traced games in the future, GeForce Now is pretty damn good on Linux https://www.neowin.net/news/nvidias-native-geforce-now-app-for-linux-bridges-the-gaming-gap-hands-on/
    • One reason it might be running hotter is dust build up within the cooling or perhaps the paste has dried out. You could always try repasting your old GPU and cleaning the cooler. Your experience in Linux will be much better with an AMD GPU; the performance in gaming is much closer to Windows than nVidia would be. I personally think on Windows, AMD drivers are junk.
    • I reviewed it back in March, but I didn't have a 5070 at the time https://www.neowin.net/reviews/amd-rx-9070-review-vs-rtx-5070-4070-and-rx-9070-xt-7800-xt--just-good-enough/ When I reviewed the 9070 I did have a 5070 to compare it against, so the scores are there for the 9070 XT. it outperforms the 5070 in raster, and is barely neck and neck in Ray Tracing. So it's better than a 5070 in everything but Ray Tracing where it is neck and neck, or just under. To be honest, the uplift from 3080 when it was new to the 9070 XT is not as great a step up. If you can find a used 4080 Super for around the same money, you would probably be better off, but if you only want to buy new then the 16GB 9070 XT is the best value for money in its category.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!