Recommended Posts

oh theres space for 1 maybe 2 120mm fans along the top, just not enough space for the h80 ones (as theres 2 and the radiator)

So I'll try that, fans are only cheap after all.. Thank you for your help!

Where do the fans plug into btw? I take it that varies between each motherboard?

Yeah.. try to add 2 Cooler Master 120mm SickleFlow fans on top there and make them push the air out of the case.

Your power supply usually comes with a 12v power adapter with 2 molex plugs. If your motherboard doesn't have case fan power on the board itself you can use those molex plugs to connect those 2 fans to it.

Like this:

12v molex power splitter

83-13653.jpg

And fan power plugs (usually fans do come with those fan/molex adapters though)

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812311003&nm_mc=KNC-GoogleAdwords&cm_mmc=KNC-GoogleAdwords-_-pla-_-Internal+Power+Cables-_-N82E16812311003&gclid=COrPp9GporUCFa57QgodvjMAJw

So here's what I suggest you do.

Keep your H80 setup as it is..

Add the 2 120mm fans on top of your case (if you can only fit one put only 1) and look for the arrow on the fan itself to put it in so it blow air out of the case.

Connect it to your motheboard chasis/case fan power or to the molex adapter.

Close the case and try it out..

If you see a drop in temp that's great.. you can then optionally add another 120mm fan on the bottom.. like here:

oE98

This will make your H80 blow air in, your front fan will blow air in, your bottom fan will blow air in and you top 2 fans will blow hot air out..

This should make your air flow inside great.

Excellent, I've ordered the fans and I'll let you know how it goes. I appreciate your help!

This is what you are going for... as far as heat dissipation goes

ebQK6

Also..that fan on the bottom is good for you because it will also blow over the GPU which well make it cooler as well.

With this setup you should get much better cooling and with H80 (which is btw a very good water cooling kit) you could push your overclock even higher.

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Boz,

I put 1 fan on the top as you said, pulling air out. And ordered 2 of the fans you said and put one on the front of the case (replacing the stock one) and one on the bottom.

My temps appear to be around the same. I'm thinking of swapping out the stock h80 fans now, as not only are they quite loud but don't seem to be doing their job that well.

Are there any particular fans you'd recommend, or would the ones you said before be suitable for the radiator too?

Thanks

(btw would epu power saving mode have any effect on temperatures?)

Hi Boz,

I put 1 fan on the top as you said, pulling air out. And ordered 2 of the fans you said and put one on the front of the case (replacing the stock one) and one on the bottom.

My temps appear to be around the same. I'm thinking of swapping out the stock h80 fans now, as not only are they quite loud but don't seem to be doing their job that well.

Are there any particular fans you'd recommend, or would the ones you said before be suitable for the radiator too?

Thanks

(btw would epu power saving mode have any effect on temperatures?)

Hm... then you might have a problem with actual H80.. The fans you added are not waste though as you indeed needed a good heat dissipation and airflow in the case. Though they should have shown at least a few degrees difference, especially on motherboard chipset components. It's weird.

I have 2 Sickle Flow 120 mm fans on my H100 for example.. they run at 1750 rpm and cool the CPU quite efficiently.. the stock ones should provide better cooling even but they are loud.

it is kind of strange that you are still getting high temps. I'm really out of ideas.. What I would do if I was in your place is just try another cooler and see how it affects the cooling.. I think that if you put a fan like Sickle Flow on your H80 your temps will most likely go up due to silent fans usually running with lower rpm than stock ones and push slightly less air.

That is unless there's something wrong with the fan itself on H80. I guess it's worth the try as it is the cheapest solution for you to try out.

  • 1 month later...

First time doing any overclocking so i'm pretty much a novice when it comes to it, been meaning to get into it, learn about it but never did. Today i did it via the bios and first attempt i got my dual core 3ghz to 3.3ghz. Pc seemed to be faster, games loaded up abit more faster too. Temp for my cpu was still around the 37c mark, popped to 40c when playing a game. I tried to overclock to 3.67GHZ but that crashed my pc at start up. So 3.4GHZ is my limit.

My question is, 2 programs, but both give me different readings.

See from picture.

overclocking.jpg

On cpu-z it says 3.398ghz (so nearly 3.4ghz) But AIDA64 says CPU Clock is 2.2GHZ unless i'm seeing something, even windows say 3.4ghz

First time doing any overclocking so i'm pretty much a novice when it comes to it, been meaning to get into it, learn about it but never did. Today i did it via the bios and first attempt i got my dual core 3ghz to 3.3ghz. Pc seemed to be faster, games loaded up abit more faster too. Temp for my cpu was still around the 37c mark, popped to 40c when playing a game. I tried to overclock to 3.67GHZ but that crashed my pc at start up. So 3.4GHZ is my limit.

My question is, 2 programs, but both give me different readings.

See from picture.

<snip>

On cpu-z it says 3.398ghz (so nearly 3.4ghz) But AIDA64 says CPU Clock is 2.2GHZ unless i'm seeing something, even windows say 3.4ghz

Aida can shows true values if You have SpeedStep enabled, so Your CPU drop clock when idle, if You have WinRAR or 7-zip use test mode to see if Your CPU rise when under load. Latest CPU-z always shows highest clock speed.

About Your OC, did You have set manual vcore or it is on auto, if on aute then cpu didn't have enough vcore on start

Aida can shows true values if You have SpeedStep enabled, so Your CPU drop clock when idle, if You have WinRAR or 7-zip use test mode to see if Your CPU rise when under load. Latest CPU-z always shows highest clock speed.

About Your OC, did You have set manual vcore or it is on auto, if on aute then cpu didn't have enough vcore on start

Oh got you. I will test it on WinRar now. On this Speedstep thing, i will check now, if it's disabled should i enable it then. The Vcore is auto, should i too change that to say 1.3 max? 1.5 is i hear bad?

Look at the multiplier value Orange, in CpuZ you`ll notice that it`s at x9 whereas in Aida it`s at x6. Basically this :)

SpeedStep - Automatically lowers the multiplier from its max. (9x for the E6850) to 6x when the machine is idle. The result is less power consumption and heat production. It goes back up to 9x when you start to get a CPU load. This is a power savings option.

I personally don`t like going to close to the limit. For the performance gain i don`t think it`s worth it.

Good luck

Look at the multiplier value Orange, in CpuZ you`ll notice that it`s at x9 whereas in Aida it`s at x6. Basically this :)

I personally don`t like going to close to the limit. For the performance gain i don`t think it`s worth it.

Good luck

Ahh many thanks, Riggers. So idle it goes down to lower speed so it can't heat up etc. When i start to do stuff on the pc it will go back to the overclocked speed. Well i'm not pushing it anymore. This was a test for me. I will go back to 3.3ghz for today.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!