[poll] worth switching to beta vista from xp?


is it worth it now switching to vista now from xp?  

339 members have voted

  1. 1. is it worth it now switching to vista now from xp?

    • Yes
      68
    • No
      271


Recommended Posts

well i mean to stick to the beta version now

586583131[/snapback]

No, that would be a rediculous thing to do.

It's a beta, for testing.. it is not meant to be used as a primary operating system yet.

Would you switch to a half built car if you already had a fully functioning one, it just wasn't the newest model? Would you move into a brand new, but half built house if you already had a house that was a few years old?

Note the rhetoric. :rolleyes:

Yeah you can't really answer that since it's only beta. It's nowhere near done yet. What if you planned on keeping it as your main OS then bought some new hardware and it didn't work.

Just because it has all that eye candy doesn't mean it's usable right now. IMO that's all this beta is right now is eye candy to show off part of the new look

No, that would be a rediculous thing to do.

It's a beta, for testing.. it is not meant to be used as a primary operating system yet.

Would you switch to a half built car if you already had a fully functioning one, it just wasn't the newest model? Would you move into a brand new, but half built house if you already had a house that was a few years old?

Note the rhetoric. :rolleyes:

586583154[/snapback]

Stupid thread, it is beta because it is not ready to be primary OS.

actually, if you want to use it as your primary OS, fine go head and do it, but if it crashes on you are wonde why there are no security updates for it. An't our problem

oh I have a better title for this thread

"Should I stick my head in an alligators mouth"

Yes

No

Edited by warwagon

mntbikeracer1:the thread is not stupid just the poster should look for other threads that answer that question instead of making a new thread about something thats already been asked.

anyways

i would advise against using it as your main os.for one thing it is beta quality and that in itself is not very stable and there are lots of bugs still,i would wait till the final product arrives but testing vista would be alright but stick to xp for now.

andykling:read above where mntbikeracer1 is mentioned and you will get the idea.

well i dunno about vista but i think he's prolly asking because alot of us used whistler as our main os (i know i did with no dual boot) and while it crashed a few times but i loved having something to work on, test and try and fix. Windows 2000 is stable as a rock and that gets boring after a while.

I would do vista but i know my laptop can't run it ...

1.2Ghz P3-M

512MB Ram

40GB

So that's why i haven't.

I am running Vista 5219 MSDN as my day to day box. I of course still have XP on dual boot when I run into issues. Actually the only problems I am having is playing videos with my 6600GT. Since I am using it at work, its not really an issue.

Just dont use Vista if you expect to play any games.

I'm really liking the search bar for the start menu, other then that I havent found much of an improvement over XP. Maybe Beta 2 will bring alot of new features.

Glass is pretty, but most of the stuff can be done in Windows XP with a few tweaks.

Most of the features such as stack by author and what not in Explorer are too slow to even think about using.

The question is somewhat pointless.

If you are a Microsoft Beta tester than you have an obligation to run Vista for testing purposes.

If you are not a Microsoft Beta tester than you shouldn't be using Vista at this time.

still in beta.. don't knock it until you've tried it...

it will be worth switching. sure its gonna cost $$$, and people like there uber pirated XP

can you really put a price before your privacy and security? Windows Vista is gonna have a major overhaul of improvements.. specially for security. so, switching worth it? Yes, 500%

I'd love to try vista if I could get my paws on it, but replacing XP with it is just nuts in my humble opinion. It's beta software and so 1) it is likely to be riddled with even more bugs than the "official" releases of windows and 2) Beta software almost always comes with little or no support. I'm not saying I know what the support situation with Vista is because I'm perfectly willing to admit I haven't checked, but I just don't trust beta software as a rule.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • But building your own.. what? You can't build anything like the Steam Machine yourself. Even trying to get close costs a good deal more. Even just the CPU cooler in their price comparison is as big as the entire Steam Machine. If you want a regular gaming PC, then by all means, build that. If you want a a small console-like PC for the living room that is good for gaming, I'm not sure what else is a better deal. In the GN review, they only mentioned a small form factor Dell, which is like twice the size and hundreds of dollars more expensive.
    • Those are some popular multiplayer games. But hardly "all". Just those that don't work on Linux currently due to specific anti-cheat implementations. I think it's also fair to point out the literally thousands of games that don't work on the PS5. And it's not locked at 1080p. That's the default, which you can change.
    • Ubuntu Livepatch arrives on Arm64 to eliminate system reboots for kernel updates by Paul Hill Canonical has just announced that its Livepatch service now supports computers with Arm64 processors. For those who are not familiar, Livepatch allows users to apply important kernel updates without any service interruption or rebooting. While home users will benefit from this, it’s even more important for critical machines that absolutely should not be going offline at all. The feature is available as part of Ubuntu Core 26 for Arm64 and Ubuntu Core 20 and onwards for AMD64. According to Canonical, this will improve the security of systems that aren’t security-maintained daily or weekly, and it helps organizations work towards Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) compliance. If you are familiar with Ubuntu, you probably know that most packages can be updated without having to restart the system. There is one big exception to this, and that’s the kernel; it typically requires you to reload the system to boot into the new kernel. With Livepatch, Canonical has done something so that you don’t need to restart to begin using the new kernel. Aside from Ubuntu Core 26, users with Arm64 chips running Ubuntu 26.04 LTS can also use Livepatch. If you want to learn more about Livepatch, check out its product page. There, you can also find a button to join Ubuntu Pro (it’s free for several home devices) so that you can enable Livepatch. By linking your computer to Ubuntu Pro, you will also extend the life of your Ubuntu install from five years to ten years. If you are running Ubuntu, let us know in the comments if you have been looking forward to this feature on your ARM-based computer. If you’ve had a compatible AMD64 machine for a while and never used this feature, let us know why in the comments!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!