2006 Corvette Z06


Recommended Posts

Z06_3.jpg

Chevrolet introduced the 2006 Corvette Z06 at the North American International Auto Show. It is the fastest, most powerful car ever offered by Chevrolet and General Motors. It is comprised of an unprecedented level of capability and technology, making it one of the greatest performance values on the market. And with an unmistakably muscular appearance, the ?06 Z06 has a visual attitude that always looks ready to demonstrate Corvette?s winning attitude to any challenger around the globe.

Review

Specs

It affordable also... $89,900 CDN...

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/381184-2006-corvette-z06/
Share on other sites

am i alone on this...

i hate the corvette.. the new design looks like they ripped off a ferrarri for the front end.. its not the fastest thing on the street.. with that price tag, i'd rather buy a mustang cobra.

what is it about the corvette that makes people go bannanas? i don't get it.

So the 2005 Z06 was a C5 and this one is the C6?

586627273[/snapback]

No, they were both C6, the 2006 though has a newer engine, and more horses, even with the new standard for measuring them.

@vice king: Off the line, there is nothing that can really compare with the Vette, without significant modifcations, at that price tag. 40-50grand for the base model, which alone can run around anything near that price tag. The new Z06, with it's higher price tag competes with muscle cars twice as expensive, and can even hang with the Viper, yet offer a smoother ride overall then the viper. The Viper was built from the ground up as a power car, the Vette was designed as a luxary sports car, which was evolved into a muscle car (just look at the 70's vette's numbers, through today's, they don't improve much until the mid-90's).

If I could afford a Z06, I would definitely buy one. As it is, I can't afford my '85 yet, gotta wait for graduation (it's paid off, but insurance for a student...)

am i alone on this...

i hate the corvette.. the new design looks like they ripped off a ferrarri for the front end.. its not the fastest thing on the street.. with that price tag, i'd rather buy a mustang cobra.

what is it about the corvette that makes people go bannanas? i don't get it.

586627367[/snapback]

You're not alone but one of the few. True it's not the fastest thing but find me a car for cheaper that is faster. It's runs with Ferrari's and Porsche's that cost twice as much, a mustang cobra is hardly the fastest thing on the street. Other than the new lights I don't see as much in common with ferrari's as with previous corvette's, I would hardly call it ripping off ferrari for a front end, would that be such a bad thing anyway since ferrari's look nice. I've never been much of a corvette fan but if they keep producing car's like this I might become one in a few years.

am i alone on this...

i hate the corvette.. the new design looks like they ripped off a ferrarri for the front end.. its not the fastest thing on the street.. with that price tag, i'd rather buy a mustang cobra.

what is it about the corvette that makes people go bannanas? i don't get it.

586627367[/snapback]

I'm not a big fan of either Corvettes or Mustangs...but this Corvette would suck a Mustang up and spit it out. I think it's a pretty sharp looking design, and considering it will run with Vipers, Ferrari, and other exotics the price tag isn't too bad. And it's only $65,000 USD....half the price of other cars at the same performance level. It's a 7.0 liter V8 and I think it ended up being a little lighter than last years model?

No, they were both C6, the 2006 though has a newer engine, and more horses, even with the new standard for measuring them.

@vice king:  Off the line, there is nothing that can really compare with the Vette, without significant modifcations, at that price tag.  40-50grand for the base model, which alone can run around anything near that price tag.  The new Z06, with it's higher price tag competes with muscle cars twice as expensive, and can even hang with the Viper, yet offer a smoother ride overall then the viper.  The Viper was built from the ground up as a power car, the Vette was designed as a luxary sports car, which was evolved into a muscle car (just look at the 70's vette's numbers, through today's, they don't improve much until the mid-90's). 

If I could afford a Z06, I would definitely buy one.  As it is, I can't afford my '85 yet, gotta wait for graduation (it's paid off, but insurance for a student...)

586627411[/snapback]

:no: I have to disagree with that statement, look at any L88 corvete, they have much more HP than the newer ones and were designed to be a pure muscle car, granted they don't have the handling the newer ones have, but they certainly had the HP. If I could afford a '68 L88, I would buy it in a second, but they are going for around $250,000 and up depending on condition, but it would be hard to find one, as they only made a total of 216 from '67 thru '69. but I'd rather have that than a newer one. :D . plus it was made the year I was born, so maybe I'm a little partial to that year, and that was when they changed the body style to the newer sexier one. I've been obsessed with the L88 series even since I started to drive.

OT: Does anyone know what year they didn't make a corvette? I remember when I worked for a parts store, when things got slow, we would call other parts stores and ask for parts for that year, and would get "I don't have a listing for that year vette", and we would say "Are you telling me that I don't have a **** sitting in my driveway that needs an alternator, or whatever part. lol.

:no: I have to disagree with that statement, look at any L88 corvete, they have much more HP than the newer ones and were designed to be a pure muscle car, granted they don't have the handling the newer ones have, but they certainly had the HP. If I could afford a '68 L88, I would buy it in a second, but they are going for around $250,000 and up depending on condition, but it would be hard to find one, as they only made a total of 216 from '67 thru '69. but I'd rather have that than a newer one. :D . plus it was made the year I was born, so maybe I'm a little partial to that year, and that was when they changed the body style to the newer sexier one. I've been obsessed with the L88 series even since I started to drive.

OT: Does anyone know what year they didn't make a corvette? I remember when I worked for a parts store, when things got slow, we would call other parts stores and ask for parts for that year, and would get "I don't have a listing for that year vette", and we would say "Are you telling me that I don't have a **** sitting in my driveway that needs an alternator, or whatever part. lol.

586628391[/snapback]

Yeah, I knew someone would call me out with the C2's. But look at the C1's first. They were more of a luxary car then a true sports car. The C2 stopped that for a while, but then with the C3 and the gas crisis, they went back to the luxary line. It wasn't until recent that they came back out with raw power. Now, they've never been a weak car by any means, just saying.

And for your quesiton, I believe your referring to the '83 corvette, which was indeed produced, just never sold due to the high number of problems. It was corrected, but not until late, and turned into the 84 model.

what is it about the corvette that makes people go bannanas? i don't get it.

586627367[/snapback]

Neither do I. The only reason I would want a Corvette is so I could drive recklessly without feeling guilty for beating the crap out of the car.

The headlights were blatantly ripped off Ferrari. While they look good on a Ferrari on a Chevy they look retarded.

Yeah, I knew someone would call me out with the C2's.  But look at the C1's first.  They were more of a luxary car then a true sports car.  The C2 stopped that for a while, but then with the C3 and the gas crisis, they went back to the luxary line.  It wasn't until recent that they came back out with raw power.  Now, they've never been a weak car by any means, just saying.

And for your quesiton, I believe your referring to the '83 corvette, which was indeed produced, just never sold due to the high number of problems.  It was corrected, but not until late, and turned into the 84 model.

586628806[/snapback]

I would have to agree. You know your vette's, most people can't answer that question. :) And there is nobody that owns an '83 vette, except maybe someone you designed and/or built it. I wish I was that lucky :) . That would be worth a fortune.

Yeah would love a Sagaris and thats about the same money as this.

586628494[/snapback]

The Sagaris is a beautiful car compared to the "American Crap" or whatever someone called it...but you can't buy them here in America (to my knowledge). Besides that there is about a $25,000 price difference and both do 0-60 in 3.7 seconds. I'm not saying I love the design or the car in general (not a corvette fan) but it packs more punch for the money...

Beautiful - Ferrari competitor at a fraction of the cost.

I'd take this over some snobby Euro sports car.

And to the guy that rather have a Shelby Mustang...well, I'll take this and be the one laughing at you in my rear view miror.

Not to say I don't love the Shelby's, but its a different class.

Gotta love the Pushrod OHV motor.. 2 valves per cylinder, displaces 7 liters but physically smaller than a 4.6 liter DOHC motor, gets better gas mileage than most v6's, has a big fat torque band that can be used anytime, about a thousand times more reliable than italian makes in the same class and it makes 505 hp. There is a version of the Corvette coming out at some point (so they say) called the blue devil and that is supposed to run over top of the Z06 performance wise.. I can't even imagine how fast the Ligenfelter version of this car would be!

C6 Z06 = the monster

There's nothing to compare with it in its price range. Amazing, amazing car. I've seen it dyno 430rwhp/410 ft-lbs torque without even being broken in.

With a header and redline oil, 490rwhp/470 ft-lbs torque.

Not only does it have amazing power, it can actually handle. If i had the money, I'd buy this instantly.

I would have to agree. You know your vette's, most people can't answer that question.  :) And there is nobody that owns an '83 vette, except maybe someone you designed and/or built it. I wish I was that lucky  :) . That would be worth a fortune.

586629297[/snapback]

While I am a Vette enthusiast, the only reason I knew that was because it's my birthyear.

The year I was born was so important, that Chevy had to stop production of the car I was destined to own.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!