The Matrix: Path Of Neo

[x-byte]

  MiKEBot said:

Teh game was AWESOME!Teh best game evah...Like that Joel Schumacher's movie...I think it's called Batman & Robin!

It's framerate is worse than any PS1 games.The sound has it's own A.I. and free will...plays when and if it wants.After all...all about Matrix is all about choice.The music supervisor definetely has ear problems.It has more bugs than Prince of Persia...both 1 & 2!

Matrix:The Path Of Neo...vis a vis,The path of the Bugs!

586807369[/snapback]

Only the PS2 version have framerate issues...

[ProtoPunch]

It's sad the pictures in the installation screen for PON look better than the actual game.

I used to have a lot of respect for Shiny/DPerry (Earthworm Jim was awesome) but it seems like the entire friggin company is incapable of creating a decent game for arguably one of the most prominent movie franchises ever.

[»X«]

  [X]-bYtE said:

Only the PS2 version have framerate issues...

586812463[/snapback]

You come and play it on my computer then mate!

[x-byte]

  SwitchBlade said:

You come and play it on my computer then mate!

586812506[/snapback]

:laugh:

[XoTiC]

  [X]-bYtE said:

Only the PS2 version have framerate issues...

586812463[/snapback]

we tried it first on xbox then pc. same issues everywhere. the just ***ed up the programing.. the thought that only with a huge name they can make some $.. so same

[x-byte]

  XoTiC said:

we tried it first on xbox then pc. same issues everywhere. the just ***ed up the programing.. the thought that only with a huge name they can make some $.. so same

586812804[/snapback]

I've read the "head to head" at IGN and I only remember that the PS2 version had framerate issues. Mabye I remember wrong though.

Yea... Atari have always been having issues with their games. Mabye they aren't qualified for multiplatform releases?

[robertobaggio2k]

so for ps2 its the same bull****? ur all tellin me not to buy it? i have it for pc and it sux but i thought it was also my **** card

[x-byte]

  robertobaggio2k said:

so for ps2 its the same bull****? ur all tellin me not to buy it? i have it for pc and it sux but i thought it was also my **** card

586812937[/snapback]

Sorry for missleading here.. I've reread the article and the PS2 version is the prefered choice.

  Quote

Overall Ranking:

1. PlayStation 2

2. Xbox

3. PC

About the graphics

PC Advantages

Best frame rate - rarely any slowdown during combat.

Cleaner display (than Xbox and PS2)

Widescreen

PC Disadvantages

Strange lighting effects

Random silhouettes on characters models

PlayStation 2 Advantages

Solid frame rate -smoother than Xbox

Normal mapping - creates the illusion of 2D objects being three dimensional

16:9 Widescreen

More thorough depth-of-field

PlayStation 2 Disadvantages

No progressive scan

Minor aliasing - typical PS2 jaggies around character models

Xbox Advantages

Progressive scan

More substantial lighting effects

Rich color - Deeper blacks than PS2

Bump mapping

Xbox Disadvantages

No widescreen

Weakest frame rate

[MiKEBot]

  [X]-bYtE said:

Only the PS2 version have framerate issues...

586812463[/snapback]

Yes I know that the PS2 has a lot of framerate issues in a lot of games but,particularly for this game,PS2 isn't responsible for the framerate.Only sucky programming is!Believe me I have played and finished the xbox version.XoTiC can verify this.We tested the pc version too.The sucking was the same...

And imho,the SCRIPT was just as awful too!Mecha Giant Smith...Yeah,right!Maybe in another game,but for this...they just ruined the whole Matrix idea.They turned it into a comedy.Especially at the end where the "digital selves of the mental projection" (or whatever) of the Wachowski Brothers showed up like "80's ATARI Graphics"!

But then again...that's just my opinion...

[robertobaggio2k]

meh i guess ill try it out incase ill exchange it for another game :)

[notuptome2004]

to me the game isant that bad it is ther to be part of the matrix take ya through all 3 filsm let ya do moves ya seen in the films. also devlopers have siad the graphics to it har far better then the ETM and i agree ther is alot of effects that have been upgraded like bullet time stuff alot of things. but i am one for graphcis but soemtimes gameplay beats the graphcis out and it does in this but they ar betetr then ETM. i own ETM for PC and while it is good it isant the best.

[Slimy]

and here we go,

6.5 on ign: http://pc.ign.com/articles/667/667871p1.html

not yet rated on gamespy: http://pc.gamespy.com/pc/the-matrix-path-of-neo/

59% on gamestats: http://www.gamestats.com/objects/729/729643/

just another movie based game that is trying to make cash fast instead of making a solid game.

[»X«]

Anyone else want to say how crap this game really is? ;)

[Toxicfume Veteran]

I actually enjoyed the game a lot, despite all these reviews and tons of negative feedback. I don't see how the controls were all that bad, I liked them oves a lot and the cutscenes were nicely placed together. I found it very entertaining playing throw the entire game, the only thign iwas fedup was from fighting smiths. It was just fun to play while pulling those nice realistic moves that were designed nicely within the game. I still have to beat the last level, but i'm a bit bored now. But it was an overall really fun game IMO.

[»X«]

Ok. Ready your tomatoes (or old syringes)

Ready?

Aim!

FIRE!

[Pc_Madness]

  Fedorpheux said:

I liked Enter The Matrix, but the problem is that it basically had no replay value. Maybe this game will fix that, who knows.

NO REPLAY VALUE?! OMGZ! Did you miss the level where your running around the skyscraper? Put on unlimited focus and then try and kill the agents. Brillant fun... until you fall off. :blush: