Kameo: SDTV vs HDTV comparison picture


Recommended Posts

dont get ****ed off because M$ slanted the weight over to the HD side, that was their mistake. To be perfectly honest, the xbox 360 isnt that much of a JUMP over the xbox, nothing near calling next gen, and for the RECORD I OWN A XBOX not a ps2.. Im sure ps3 will have the same problem but then again, its not comming out next week is it?

When it all comes down to the wire, my computer will own this 360 3x over, thats where the "Next Gen" is..

ps1 to ps2 = OMG stunning worth every penny....

xbox over ps2 =  bragging rights but ps2 had games hands down.

ps2 to ps3 = we dont know yet...

xbox to xbox 360 = 20% improvement = not worth 300.00 and FOR DAMN SURE NOT WORTH A 2000.00 DOLLAR TV INVESTMENT!

586824257[/snapback]

Where are you getting this 20% figure from? Obviously first party games aren't going to look the best. Give the developers time, and then you'll see the real power that they bring out of consoles.

What about viewing your favorite shows in HD?  Is that worth it?

586824271[/snapback]

you have a good point but 2000 is steap enough, let alone another 300 for a game console..

my neighbor has hdtv, there isnt enough channels in hd yet for me to switch, our provider has like 120 and alot of them are news channels, who the hell wants to watch CNN in hd? lmao

http://www.gamespot.com/features/6139690/index.html

And ...... FIGHT!

586824084[/snapback]

Damn, definently hooking the 360 up to my cpu monitor.

HD-TV or not though I still think 360 is a great value. $400 bucks for a console that matches, if not surpasses high end PCs. Plus I take comfort in the fact that 90% of console gamers don't own an HD-TV.

And PS3 will have the same problem, so if anything this seems like an argument to invest in a high end PC.

Edited by Hipster

problem being is hd sets really still at this point dont have a point.. We still dont have movies available to us in 720p or 1080p for a optical medium.. The xbox 360 cant even play them, other than games.... Tv content providers only have tops of 100 channels, and theres not to many great things on these channels, sports, and news.. so realisticly here buying a hdtv set for that isn't worth it yet, and also the fact is if your going to buy one your best interest would be in either 1080i or 1080p since most movies that are in the future will be filmed in 1080p. The first movie I know of to be filmed in 1080p is star wars episode 3. Lucas Films did a hd version that is 1080p, but realistcly he cant put it on a dvd so a new optical medium is required.

So past my non-sense, to sum this up easier.. 100 channels of hd content, video games?, no personal video playback aka optical mediums. What would be the point of a hdtv set as of right now?

Looks like MS has made a bit of a blunder with this HD mess. If nothing else they're going to confuse their customers to high hell.

And that gamespot article makes me feel ancient! All they really so young to be outraged at artifacts when using an RF converter?

Also, I really have to call into question their suggestion of hooking it up to a computer monitor being a good idea. I do believe the monitor's signal is not actually digital, so there will be quality loss in the conversion. Also, there have always been tremendous color contrast and brightness issues for me when I've used TV formatted programming on a PC monitor or the other way around.. Maybe I'm just not enough in with this "higher resolution will solve your problems" gaming generation.

you have a good point but 2000 is steap enough, let alone another 300 for a game console..

my neighbor has hdtv, there isnt enough channels in hd yet for me to switch, our provider has like 120 and alot of them are news channels, who the hell wants to watch CNN in hd? lmao

586824329[/snapback]

You can get HDTVs for a lot less than 2 grand, just depends on what you're looking for. We've got a nice 34" Toshiba HDTV (just a flat screen CRT type one) and that was less than a grand, and we've got a 51" Toshiba HDTV that was around 1400 after bargaining with the guy. So sure they're expensive but I don't think they're ridiculously expensive considering the difference in quality you get with them.

im going to be 5 or 6 feet away from my tv , not 1 inch away. So will I see every blade of grass no, so sdtv is fine for me.

586822473[/snapback]

You must have bad eyes if you can't see that level of detail from 6 feet away :blink: My tv is almost 10 feet away and I can see that kind of detail.

dont get ****ed off because M$ slanted the weight over to the HD side, that was their mistake. To be perfectly honest, the xbox 360 isnt that much of a JUMP over the xbox, nothing near calling next gen, and for the RECORD I OWN A XBOX not a ps2.. Im sure ps3 will have the same problem but then again, its not comming out next week is it?

When it all comes down to the wire, my computer will own this 360 3x over, thats where the "Next Gen" is..

ps1 to ps2 = OMG stunning worth every penny....

xbox over ps2 =  bragging rights but ps2 had games hands down.

ps2 to ps3 = we dont know yet...

xbox to xbox 360 = 20% improvement = not worth 300.00 and FOR DAMN SURE NOT WORTH A 2000.00 DOLLAR TV INVESTMENT!

586824257[/snapback]

Xbox 1:

733mhz Intel proccer

64Megs 100mhz DDR shared system/video ram

GeForce 3/4Ti DX8.1 based graphics technolagy PS 1.3/1.4 233mhz clock speed

Xbox360

3x Cores @ 3.2ghz each

512 Megs 700mhz DDR shared video/ system ram

10Megs DDR Buffer ram

ATI 500mhz custume Directx is equale to and exceeds what we can excpect in Directx 10+

so anyways your telling me Xbox 1 cna do this quality

http://media.xbox360.ign.com/media/741/741...mg_3113362.html

dont get ****ed off because M$ slanted the weight over to the HD side, that was their mistake. To be perfectly honest, the xbox 360 isnt that much of a JUMP over the xbox, nothing near calling next gen, and for the RECORD I OWN A XBOX not a ps2.. Im sure ps3 will have the same problem but then again, its not comming out next week is it?

When it all comes down to the wire, my computer will own this 360 3x over, thats where the "Next Gen" is..

ps1 to ps2 = OMG stunning worth every penny....

xbox over ps2 =? bragging rights but ps2 had games hands down.

ps2 to ps3 = we dont know yet...

xbox to xbox 360 = 20% improvement = not worth 300.00 and FOR DAMN SURE NOT WORTH A 2000.00 DOLLAR TV INVESTMENT!

586824257[/snapback]

I'd hardly call shifting the weight to the HD side a "mistake"... The industry is headed in that direction anyway, albeit a little slowly, Microsoft's just bringing that shift sooner.

Your computer right now can't come close to the 360, and likely never will for the same price (at least not in the 360's lifetime). Have you seen the prices for dual-core CPUs? And this one is atriple-core> with a GPU so advanced that only the newest chips come anywhere close. The entire architecture is something PCs won't match for years, and you're saying it's only marginally better than the current Xbox?

As for improvements from generation to generation, the original PlayStation was instrumental in the maturation of video games. It was a huge leap in terms of graphics, however, it wasn't exactly the best technology had to offer. Consoles at that time were so far behind PC hardware, and the PS2/Xbox generation brought the console hardware closer in power to the PCs of this generation (but not quite; consoles are definitely behind today's PCs).

This next generation should ensure that consoles remain competitive with PCs long after their release, and they'lldefinitely> be ahead in terms of power in the beginning of their lifetimes. Just wait and see...

Your words make it sound like the only reason to buy an HDTV is for games. How about DVDs? What about regular TV? You don't need to spend two grand on a HDTV, though it's very easy to do, and if/when you do, you'll appreciate it for more than just better looking games.

This is really stupid.

The only different between HTDV and SDTV is resolution.

586823767[/snapback]

Wow, people are so blind to the facts. First of all, I can't even believe this is a question. Of course HDTV is 5-10 times more visual than an SDTV. In HDTV watching a nature channel is like watching it in 3D. Everything is 3D and not only is the clarity nice, but so is the image and pixel rates. The motion on the screen is SOoo smooth. It's like a tottal graphics update on your TV. It saddens me that people are asking what the difference is. Trust me, I have one of the nicest looking HDTV's. Have you seen the mother nature shows on PBS HD in HD? My god, they look so real, so 3D. Really, I felt like I could walk up to the TV and touch the pretty womens nose. I could see goddamn camera image in her wet eyeball. I could see the weathermans sweat through his hair on his head, you can see it shining through. All the kids walked up to the TV like they never seen one before and put their hands right on the ladies nose too. Even the 7 year olds were like "WOW what is she doing here daddy". I had to tell him "Son, shes not inside the TV, this is just HDTV". That's the kind of difference it can have. Have you seen the 9 news (channel 92.1 I think) in HD? I've never enjoyed watching the news so much in my life. (Channels will varry in different states). The difference is so big, that it will disgust you in SDTV. I walk from the living room where the normal SDTV is into my room where the HDTV is, and I see both TV's are on the same channel.. after seeing mine, the one in the living room completely disatisfies me. The difference is VERY big. I'm very sad this is even a question.

Edited by Acro84

well over here we dont even get HD television channels, we have terrestrial (aerial) and digital cable which i think can do low end HD on very few channels and we are an advanced country compared to most (i am in the UK) so 80% of other countries (excluding USA/CAN) are going to be worse off with possibly just aerial in. The US and Canada are the only places that HD has really kicked off (i dont know about japan)

HDTV's therefore aren't a worthwhile purchase for the casual gamer and out of say 250 people i know, only three or so will know what HDTV is and only 1 would probably buy it.

I barely ever play games, i stick to a single game and just play that casually (like Halo 2) but I will be getting a HDTV for futureproofing anyway and getting the full out of X360 ;)

This next generation should ensure that consoles remain competitive with PCs long after their release, and they'll definitely be ahead in terms of power in the beginning of their lifetimes. Just wait and see...

Your words make it sound like the only reason to buy an HDTV is for games. How about DVDs? What about regular TV? You don't need to spend two grand on a HDTV, though it's very easy to do, and if/when you do, you'll appreciate it for more than just better looking games.

586824611[/snapback]

You can already get more powerful PCs.....dual core opteron, SLI 7800s, 4gb memory, don't tell me that wouldn't surpass the Xbox 360.

Of course not for $300.  That's not the point, he said that the Xbox 360 is more powerful than PCs and won't be surpassed for quite some time, and that is false.

586826802[/snapback]

Do pc's have 3 cpu cores or whatever?

Can pc's(not super computers which IBM/ Nasa has) run at the boasted 1TFLOP or 2TFLOP or whatever?

Do pc's have 3 cpu cores or whatever?

Can pc's(not super computers which IBM/ Nasa has) run at the boasted 1TFLOP or 2TFLOP or whatever?

586826848[/snapback]

FLOPS have "nothing" to do with gaming, Sony has proved that with Playstation 2 and now Playstation 3 :rofl:

It's a very good price for the components

FLOPS have "nothing" to do with gaming, Sony has proved that with Playstation 2 and now Playstation 3  :rofl:

It's a very good price for the components

586826953[/snapback]

they have not yet proved that with the PS3 since ther is no PS3 with retial quality games out now is ther. right now ther is only Alpha Kits out ther with those devlopers who have reached in to ther checkbooks and pokets to buy the costly thing

give me one reason why what is in the hdtv picture cant be done in the standard picture.?

Its done that way purposely to sell more hdtvs . there is nothing in the hdtv pic that cant be done on the other one except for the clarity.

also the character is not in the same position so its hard to tell the dif

586822435[/snapback]

You dont have nor have seen a HDTV before if you did and you still say this above... you werent watching it right

i played 360 on both and own a HDTV

huge difference - stop spreading rumors casue you obv. didnt have the opportunity to exp like it was ment

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!