Kameo: SDTV vs HDTV comparison picture


Recommended Posts

Let me clear this up...

You guys look at movies and see sharp detail. Those movies are compressed crap comparred to the film source.

So you think the SD tv is capable of sharper images IT IS :blink:

But your missing the point Video game dont have a sharper source they are picture as what the system makes them out to be.

For the xbox to render HIGHER RESOLTION IMAGES it needs the HDTV equipment for the xbox to kick in the higher resolution.

Just like how your moniter from 1992 at your home cant do 1600x1200

thats all people you know TV's are set reslution its a higher upgrade same for computer moniters

so if you ever seen the detail jump in YOUR pc games from having a new coputer and new moniter and GFX card you know the difference when games went from

800x600 to 1280x1024 or 1280 x 720

its that drastic STOP if already its the same rules as a PC if you dont got the equipment you dont play like the rest, i never heard any body bitch about hey i cant play this game cause i dont have a good enough moniter, if you dont you tuck you tails between your legs.

yes the world has more standard but here to the death of standard

its mandatory in USA by 2009

you will thank me later

Games I have seen so far on the x360 can get petter performance on today's pcs. But xbox 360 gives a great performance for the price you pay.

586828796[/snapback]

that is not entirely true at all in games sutch as PDZ and PGR3 they could be run ona moderan PC but very very tomed down in visuals and graphics. and you also need to understand that the Xbox 360 framerate is limted by TVs 60HZ now if TVs had no limtations to HZs then it would be possable we could see PDZ and PGR3 running at 180FPS or so i would bet but thats not happening now .

It's true PC's get the latest video cards but they don't use them the way they should. Did you know a PC never uses a video card at it's full optimization? I don't care if your PC is 4GHZ with 4GB of ram. You never use the cards full optimization. Consoles use the full spec including the extra goodness because they are 'entirely' devoted to pushing the graphics. They'll also need to work on 'next gen' AI for the PC as well before catching back up with these new consoles. The xbox only has a 64MB video embedded and take a look at Ninja Gaiden. The PS2 has only half of that and look how nice the graphics are on some games. Ninja Gaiden looks like it's running on 128+. It's amazing how a console can utilize the power of a GPU so small. Now imagine what a game can look like with 256MB video in the next consoles. It's easy to say graphics are more 'polished' on a console.

If you took the fastest computer in your house, installed a 64MB video card and Ninja Gaiden, hooked up the XBOX with it's already embedded 64mb video, and compared Ninja Gaiden 'with the same resolution and hardware specs' on both you would see what I'm talking about (without comparing your monitors resolution to your TV). If a PC has 64MB It's going to make the game look and run at 64MB or less. If the Console has 64MB It's going to push it allot harder... ALOT. It's going to double without the extra pipelines it's bigger neighbors have. Consoles are just never updated as often as a PC because it takes allot more time to put them out. Now with all these new resolutions for the PS3 and 360 you can bet they'll stay on level with he PC for a while. Resolution and screen suffered tremendously for the PS2 and XBOX. That?s all fixed now:):)

Remember this is all compared with the same system specs. So don't bring up that "wahah but PC an upgrade firmware/hardware".

  It's true PC's get the latest video cards but they don't use them the way they should. Did you know a PC never uses a video card at it's full optimization? I don't care if your PC is 4GHZ with 4GB of ram. You never use the cards full optimization. Consoles use the full spec including the extra goodness because they are 'entirely' devoted to pushing the graphics. They'll also need to work on 'next gen' AI for the PC as well before catching back up with these new consoles. The xbox only has a 64MB video embedded and take a look at Ninja Gaiden. The PS2 has only half of that and look how nice the graphics are on some games. Ninja Gaiden looks like it's running on 128+. It's amazing how a console can utilize the power of a GPU so small. Now imagine what a game can look like with 256MB video in the next consoles. It's easy to say graphics are more 'polished' on a console.

If you took the fastest computer in your house, installed a 64MB video card and Ninja Gaiden, hooked up the XBOX with it's already embedded 64mb video, and compared Ninja Gaiden 'with the same resolution and hardware specs' on both you would see what I'm talking about (without comparing your monitors resolution to your TV). If a PC has 64MB It's going to make the game look and run at 64MB or less. If the Console has 64MB It's going to push it allot harder... ALOT. It's going to double without the extra pipelines it's bigger neighbors have. Consoles are just never updated as often as a PC because it takes allot more time to put them out. Now with all these new resolutions for the PS3 and 360 you can bet they'll stay on level with he PC for a while. Resolution and screen suffered tremendously for the PS2 and XBOX. That?s all fixed now smile.gif

Remember this is all compared with the same system specs. So don't bring up that "wahah but PC an upgrade firmware/hardware".

Very true ::rofl:l:

The differance between 480P and 1080i are very noticable on my Sony 32" HDTV (CRT) I compared Kameo and was suprised at the differance. So much sharper / detailed / brighter and vibrant in 1080i. Its like seeing two differant TV's in one.

So far im very impressed with Xbox360 ,currently own Condemned / PGR3 / Perfect Dark and Kameo.

Xbox 1: 

733mhz Intel proccer

64Megs 100mhz DDR shared system/video ram

GeForce 3/4Ti DX8.1  based graphics technolagy PS 1.3/1.4  233mhz  clock speed

Xbox360

3x Cores  @ 3.2ghz each

512 Megs  700mhz DDR shared video/ system ram

10Megs DDR Buffer ram

ATI  500mhz custume  Directx is equale to and exceeds what we can excpect  in Directx 10+

so anyways your telling me Xbox 1 cna do this quality   

http://media.xbox360.ign.com/media/741/741...mg_3113362.html

586824576[/snapback]

lol no kidding , Ive owned the original Xbox since launch and seriously it cant even come close to what Xbox 360 is capable of. Its way beyond a 20% improvement.

well over here we dont even get HD television channels, we have terrestrial (aerial) and digital cable which i think can do low end HD on very few channels and we are an advanced country compared to most (i am in the UK) so 80% of other countries (excluding USA/CAN) are going to be worse off with possibly just aerial in. The US and Canada are the only places that HD has really kicked off (i dont know about japan)

HDTV's therefore aren't a worthwhile purchase for the casual gamer and out of say 250 people i know, only three or so will know what HDTV is and only 1 would probably buy it.

I barely ever play games, i stick to a single game and just play that casually (like Halo 2) but I will be getting a HDTV for futureproofing anyway and getting the full out of X360 ;)

586825822[/snapback]

Dude Japan was the pioneer in HD technology. They've had it since 1993. However, they used analog HD instead of digital HD but they might have converted already, I'm not sure.

Yeah I gotta say im not much of a console man but the 360 does look impressive, even more so with the High Definition, I mean if you buy equipment you want it to utilise all it can, which obviously means taking advantage of the HD facilities. Fact is makes sense to me, I dont know about your other countries, but HDTVs seem to be reasonably priced in my estimation here in Aus anyway. Plus it will be nice to have a device which actually uses the HD features since HD Broadcasts in Australia are not too frequent hence rendering a High Definition set and or set-top box reasonably useless.

say that to me when your done playing quake for on the 360 :p

586850462[/snapback]

i dont plan to play Quake IV on the 360 and if you are makeing your cliam based on 1 single game then you should think agian your statement . how about you try and play some PDZ or PGR3 or codenamed criminal . or so and see what you think. and at anyrate most PC games that may get ported to Xbox 360 could run full blown graphics with full FSAA and AF enabled and at 60FPS with no FPs loss liek you may get on PC

these posts are so pointless. i am all for xbox but theres always gonna be people trashing it then jerking off when the ps3 comes out and throw fits when the xbox people trash it. just buy the console you want and enjoy, stop sitting in forums putting people or thier thoughts down because its not the same as you. its very childish and your not gonna change anyones mind. u can trash something a million times and its not gonna make us not buy it.

btw. the topic says Kameo: SDTV vs HDTV comparison picture. you all just got way off topic. and btw again, pcs can be built better one day but never for $300 - $500

Interesting, still not enough to make my buy another TV. I don't care, the Xbox360 with my "old" TV is just enough for me. I'm not that geeky and chocked full of money that I would buy new tv for a console :p

Maybe one day when I'm a millionaire, but not just today...

Here's a video someone made of SDTV footage in game, the quality of the vid gets a bit bad at the end but you can clearly see those supposed SDTV PGR3 shots a few pages back are BS, it looks stunning just not as crisp...I still want a HDTV though, not going to happen for a long while though lol.

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=PRNYC1GW

When it all comes down to the wire, my computer will own this 360 3x over, thats where the "Next Gen" is..

586824257[/snapback]

unless your pc has architecture and technologies not yet available for pc's i think you may well be lying. still, i'm open to all comers, so please post your spec and we'll see. Still, even if it were true, you couldn't expect to get a consumer priced graphics card as powerful as the one in 360 for less than you buy the console. Add to that the rest of the power and it makes pretty good sense to me.

just look at a release game; cod2, and how it's better on the console than the pc and i think you have some indication. :D

that's a bad comparison picture! why do people keep taking shots of the game with their camera? don't they know that it doesn't represent the actual quality of the game? they are only make the xbox 360's visual quality look worst. the only correct way to compare quality is to hook it up to a computer or some other devices that can take a perfect snapshot off the actual graphical data stream. until then, these comparison photos are pointless.

tested a core x360 on a old Hitachi TV (early 90s tvs i guess) and I was impressed by the quality on such a TV. And also my friend bought the Premium and tested this baby on HDTV Plasma 42". You clearly see the difference, amazing ! A lot better but it's still very very good on a normal tv so I say good job MicroSoft/ATi.

BY the way Condemned rules !! One of the best games out there.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      195
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!