Kameo: SDTV vs HDTV comparison picture


Recommended Posts

Let me clear this up...

You guys look at movies and see sharp detail. Those movies are compressed crap comparred to the film source.

So you think the SD tv is capable of sharper images IT IS :blink:

But your missing the point Video game dont have a sharper source they are picture as what the system makes them out to be.

For the xbox to render HIGHER RESOLTION IMAGES it needs the HDTV equipment for the xbox to kick in the higher resolution.

Just like how your moniter from 1992 at your home cant do 1600x1200

thats all people you know TV's are set reslution its a higher upgrade same for computer moniters

so if you ever seen the detail jump in YOUR pc games from having a new coputer and new moniter and GFX card you know the difference when games went from

800x600 to 1280x1024 or 1280 x 720

its that drastic STOP if already its the same rules as a PC if you dont got the equipment you dont play like the rest, i never heard any body bitch about hey i cant play this game cause i dont have a good enough moniter, if you dont you tuck you tails between your legs.

yes the world has more standard but here to the death of standard

its mandatory in USA by 2009

you will thank me later

Games I have seen so far on the x360 can get petter performance on today's pcs. But xbox 360 gives a great performance for the price you pay.

586828796[/snapback]

that is not entirely true at all in games sutch as PDZ and PGR3 they could be run ona moderan PC but very very tomed down in visuals and graphics. and you also need to understand that the Xbox 360 framerate is limted by TVs 60HZ now if TVs had no limtations to HZs then it would be possable we could see PDZ and PGR3 running at 180FPS or so i would bet but thats not happening now .

It's true PC's get the latest video cards but they don't use them the way they should. Did you know a PC never uses a video card at it's full optimization? I don't care if your PC is 4GHZ with 4GB of ram. You never use the cards full optimization. Consoles use the full spec including the extra goodness because they are 'entirely' devoted to pushing the graphics. They'll also need to work on 'next gen' AI for the PC as well before catching back up with these new consoles. The xbox only has a 64MB video embedded and take a look at Ninja Gaiden. The PS2 has only half of that and look how nice the graphics are on some games. Ninja Gaiden looks like it's running on 128+. It's amazing how a console can utilize the power of a GPU so small. Now imagine what a game can look like with 256MB video in the next consoles. It's easy to say graphics are more 'polished' on a console.

If you took the fastest computer in your house, installed a 64MB video card and Ninja Gaiden, hooked up the XBOX with it's already embedded 64mb video, and compared Ninja Gaiden 'with the same resolution and hardware specs' on both you would see what I'm talking about (without comparing your monitors resolution to your TV). If a PC has 64MB It's going to make the game look and run at 64MB or less. If the Console has 64MB It's going to push it allot harder... ALOT. It's going to double without the extra pipelines it's bigger neighbors have. Consoles are just never updated as often as a PC because it takes allot more time to put them out. Now with all these new resolutions for the PS3 and 360 you can bet they'll stay on level with he PC for a while. Resolution and screen suffered tremendously for the PS2 and XBOX. That?s all fixed now:):)

Remember this is all compared with the same system specs. So don't bring up that "wahah but PC an upgrade firmware/hardware".

  It's true PC's get the latest video cards but they don't use them the way they should. Did you know a PC never uses a video card at it's full optimization? I don't care if your PC is 4GHZ with 4GB of ram. You never use the cards full optimization. Consoles use the full spec including the extra goodness because they are 'entirely' devoted to pushing the graphics. They'll also need to work on 'next gen' AI for the PC as well before catching back up with these new consoles. The xbox only has a 64MB video embedded and take a look at Ninja Gaiden. The PS2 has only half of that and look how nice the graphics are on some games. Ninja Gaiden looks like it's running on 128+. It's amazing how a console can utilize the power of a GPU so small. Now imagine what a game can look like with 256MB video in the next consoles. It's easy to say graphics are more 'polished' on a console.

If you took the fastest computer in your house, installed a 64MB video card and Ninja Gaiden, hooked up the XBOX with it's already embedded 64mb video, and compared Ninja Gaiden 'with the same resolution and hardware specs' on both you would see what I'm talking about (without comparing your monitors resolution to your TV). If a PC has 64MB It's going to make the game look and run at 64MB or less. If the Console has 64MB It's going to push it allot harder... ALOT. It's going to double without the extra pipelines it's bigger neighbors have. Consoles are just never updated as often as a PC because it takes allot more time to put them out. Now with all these new resolutions for the PS3 and 360 you can bet they'll stay on level with he PC for a while. Resolution and screen suffered tremendously for the PS2 and XBOX. That?s all fixed now smile.gif

Remember this is all compared with the same system specs. So don't bring up that "wahah but PC an upgrade firmware/hardware".

Very true ::rofl:l:

The differance between 480P and 1080i are very noticable on my Sony 32" HDTV (CRT) I compared Kameo and was suprised at the differance. So much sharper / detailed / brighter and vibrant in 1080i. Its like seeing two differant TV's in one.

So far im very impressed with Xbox360 ,currently own Condemned / PGR3 / Perfect Dark and Kameo.

Xbox 1: 

733mhz Intel proccer

64Megs 100mhz DDR shared system/video ram

GeForce 3/4Ti DX8.1  based graphics technolagy PS 1.3/1.4  233mhz  clock speed

Xbox360

3x Cores  @ 3.2ghz each

512 Megs  700mhz DDR shared video/ system ram

10Megs DDR Buffer ram

ATI  500mhz custume  Directx is equale to and exceeds what we can excpect  in Directx 10+

so anyways your telling me Xbox 1 cna do this quality   

http://media.xbox360.ign.com/media/741/741...mg_3113362.html

586824576[/snapback]

lol no kidding , Ive owned the original Xbox since launch and seriously it cant even come close to what Xbox 360 is capable of. Its way beyond a 20% improvement.

well over here we dont even get HD television channels, we have terrestrial (aerial) and digital cable which i think can do low end HD on very few channels and we are an advanced country compared to most (i am in the UK) so 80% of other countries (excluding USA/CAN) are going to be worse off with possibly just aerial in. The US and Canada are the only places that HD has really kicked off (i dont know about japan)

HDTV's therefore aren't a worthwhile purchase for the casual gamer and out of say 250 people i know, only three or so will know what HDTV is and only 1 would probably buy it.

I barely ever play games, i stick to a single game and just play that casually (like Halo 2) but I will be getting a HDTV for futureproofing anyway and getting the full out of X360 ;)

586825822[/snapback]

Dude Japan was the pioneer in HD technology. They've had it since 1993. However, they used analog HD instead of digital HD but they might have converted already, I'm not sure.

Yeah I gotta say im not much of a console man but the 360 does look impressive, even more so with the High Definition, I mean if you buy equipment you want it to utilise all it can, which obviously means taking advantage of the HD facilities. Fact is makes sense to me, I dont know about your other countries, but HDTVs seem to be reasonably priced in my estimation here in Aus anyway. Plus it will be nice to have a device which actually uses the HD features since HD Broadcasts in Australia are not too frequent hence rendering a High Definition set and or set-top box reasonably useless.

say that to me when your done playing quake for on the 360 :p

586850462[/snapback]

i dont plan to play Quake IV on the 360 and if you are makeing your cliam based on 1 single game then you should think agian your statement . how about you try and play some PDZ or PGR3 or codenamed criminal . or so and see what you think. and at anyrate most PC games that may get ported to Xbox 360 could run full blown graphics with full FSAA and AF enabled and at 60FPS with no FPs loss liek you may get on PC

these posts are so pointless. i am all for xbox but theres always gonna be people trashing it then jerking off when the ps3 comes out and throw fits when the xbox people trash it. just buy the console you want and enjoy, stop sitting in forums putting people or thier thoughts down because its not the same as you. its very childish and your not gonna change anyones mind. u can trash something a million times and its not gonna make us not buy it.

btw. the topic says Kameo: SDTV vs HDTV comparison picture. you all just got way off topic. and btw again, pcs can be built better one day but never for $300 - $500

Interesting, still not enough to make my buy another TV. I don't care, the Xbox360 with my "old" TV is just enough for me. I'm not that geeky and chocked full of money that I would buy new tv for a console :p

Maybe one day when I'm a millionaire, but not just today...

Here's a video someone made of SDTV footage in game, the quality of the vid gets a bit bad at the end but you can clearly see those supposed SDTV PGR3 shots a few pages back are BS, it looks stunning just not as crisp...I still want a HDTV though, not going to happen for a long while though lol.

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=PRNYC1GW

When it all comes down to the wire, my computer will own this 360 3x over, thats where the "Next Gen" is..

586824257[/snapback]

unless your pc has architecture and technologies not yet available for pc's i think you may well be lying. still, i'm open to all comers, so please post your spec and we'll see. Still, even if it were true, you couldn't expect to get a consumer priced graphics card as powerful as the one in 360 for less than you buy the console. Add to that the rest of the power and it makes pretty good sense to me.

just look at a release game; cod2, and how it's better on the console than the pc and i think you have some indication. :D

that's a bad comparison picture! why do people keep taking shots of the game with their camera? don't they know that it doesn't represent the actual quality of the game? they are only make the xbox 360's visual quality look worst. the only correct way to compare quality is to hook it up to a computer or some other devices that can take a perfect snapshot off the actual graphical data stream. until then, these comparison photos are pointless.

tested a core x360 on a old Hitachi TV (early 90s tvs i guess) and I was impressed by the quality on such a TV. And also my friend bought the Premium and tested this baby on HDTV Plasma 42". You clearly see the difference, amazing ! A lot better but it's still very very good on a normal tv so I say good job MicroSoft/ATi.

BY the way Condemned rules !! One of the best games out there.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
    • Putin was behind Farage/Brexit and behind Trump/MAGA. Different idiot lying beasts, same fascist master. Same screwed up results for both nations.
    • For me the Final Fantasy games, Langrisser I & II, Hardspace: Shipbreaker, Horizon Forbidden West Complete Edition, Metaphor: ReFantazio and LUNAR Remastered Collection
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!