[NHL] Not liking division battles


Recommended Posts

Well over all, I'm loving most of the new changes to the NHL. One i'm having a tough time with is the weight put on divison battles.

Take a look at the Central division, 3 of the teams there are DEADLAST in the entire NHL. Nashville is competent and Detroit is good. But Detroits record is grossly overexagurated compared to what it would be had it not should they have to play outside their division more often.

Continuing with the detroit example, their interdivision record is 8-0-0, outside their division, they are 7-4-2... a little more accurate to where they should be.

Now look at divisions like the Northwest and the Northeast. Practically every team in both of those divisions should be making it to the playoffs. All very good teams, but odds are ALTEAST 1, probably atleast 2 teams are gonna be dropped from the list because nearly 50% of the games they're playing against teams that are all cup contenders and aren't the easy wins like playing most of the Central or Southeast division.

Also as a fan, I find it rather boring to watch my team play the same teams that are within driving distance ALL THE TIME. I wanna see games against the penguins and the senators more often, none of this colorado, colorado, vancouver, colorado, nashville, vancouver, colorado crap. How boring.

Otherwise, I'm enjoying the season thus far. Just had to put that out there on a public forum ;)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/399246-nhl-not-liking-division-battles/
Share on other sites

Ive been saying that all year. The wings are #1 in the NHL with 31 points but 14 of those points came from back to back to back games vs the Hawks, Blues and Blue Jackets. I don't mind division rivalries, but what becomes so special about a riavlry when the Canadiens play the Laffs and the Sens 8x each a year? Thats not a rivalry, thats just another damn game. I'd love for the Red Wings to come to town, or the Canucks, Flames, Kings and especially the Avalanche... The NHL should mix things up a bit instead of having Western Conf. teams play in the East once every 2 years. These games just beome all too common and there becomes a lack of excitement... "Oh the Panthers are in town again!!"

I wouldn't look into points too much. For example, Western teams like Detroit, Nashville, Vancouver, and Dallas, may seem just as good as Eastern teams with similar points, but the Eastern conference is far better.

Divisional rivalries are supposed to become special because repeated matches will cause competitiveness between teams after so many times playing. However, it's not exactly working, as bayrider points out.

The Eastern Conference is much better? :unsure: How exactly do you gather that? Both conferences look rather even to me. :blink:

586833376[/snapback]

Well, the Northeast division leads the East, with five strong teams. Ottawa, Boston and Montreal are among the best (Ottawa being the best in the league in my opinion, and I hate them, no bias), and Toronto and Buffalo are no pushovers. They are good teams that suffer from being in that division.

The Atlantic also has good representation. Pittsburgh is a weak team, yes, but they have some talent, while they play against heavyweights Philadelphia (in the top five teams in league), Rangers (have emerged as a strong team), New Jersey (still very good despite Brodeur struggles), and even the Islanders have shown skill this year.

The Southeast, while traditionally the weakest in the league, has success in Tampa Bay and Carolina, two of the best. Atlanta goes between great and terrible, so they are often dangerous, while Florida is a not bad team. Washington is the only team, other than Pittsburgh, that is definitely among the worst.

Points cannot dictate how good a team is, esapecially because they are only playing their own conference. Detroit and Nashville play in a division that includes St. Louis, Columbus, and Chicago, three of the worst in the league. That inflates their points from repeatedly defeating the worse teams.

Pacific, with a lineup of Anaheim, Dallas, San Jose, Phoenix, and Los Angeles, has no real contender, only mid level teams. Arguably, Dallas and Los Angeles could do well, but they are not beating Ottawa, Philadelphia, or Carolina.

The Northwest is the strongest Western division, very competitive. However, Minnesota has suffered because they don't have enough talent to drive them. Colorado is a good team, but do not dominate. Calgary is in the top Western teams, a contender, but Edmonton has struggles at goal. Vancouver is also among the best (Despite my bias), but it struggles to win inside it's own division while they can win against the weaker divisions.

The East just has better teams and better talent (see the scoring race. Almost all Eastern players, such as amazing talents Jason Spezza, Daniel Afredsson, Eric Staal, Alexander Ovechkin, and Sidney Crosby) . Ask hockey experts, I believe that they would agree with me.

So the East has a strong division -- big whoop. In the west you have the Pacific and Northwest divisions, both of which are strong. Does that mean the West is better than the east? Not really, no.

I like how you basically throw your opinions out there and try to make facts out of them. Like how the Pacific division has teams with lots of points, but no real contenders -- we'll see on that, buddy, but don't make such bold statements like that if you can't back it up.

99% of your post was opinions without backing it up. I can ask hockey experts, and I would say they all would say it's pretty even. Of course if I were to put a gun to their head they may say the East, but I'll bet good money that it'd be split between the east and west even then.

Talent has nothing to do with it... the team that is better gets it, and you can't say that because a team has a scoring leader means they'll go anywhere. Washington isn't going anywhere barring a miracle, even with Ovechkin.

So the East has a strong division -- big whoop. In the west you have the Pacific and Northwest divisions, both of which are strong. Does that mean the West is better than the east? Not really, no.

I like how you basically throw your opinions out there and try to make facts out of them. Like how the Pacific division has teams with lots of points, but no real contenders -- we'll see on that, buddy, but don't make such bold statements like that if you can't back it up.

99% of your post was opinions without backing it up. I can ask hockey experts, and I would say they all would say it's pretty even. Of course if I were to put a gun to their head they may say the East, but I'll bet good money that it'd be split between the east and west even then.

Talent has nothing to do with it... the team that is better gets it, and you can't say that because a team has a scoring leader means they'll go anywhere. Washington isn't going anywhere barring a miracle, even with Ovechkin.

586833741[/snapback]

No, I'd say all three divisions in the East are fairly strong. Northeast being the strongest in the league with the other two competing for 3rd and 4th.

Yes, it is my opinion. Don't claim that there are facts of hockey, that can always predict who will win. As a hockey fan, that is what I believe. You asked why I think that, and that's what I responded with. Don't be so hostile.

And yes, I think talent has a lot to do with it. Teams with better talent generally do better. I didn't say that Ovechkin would carry Washington, but I do think that teams like Ottawa, Boston, Philadelphia, Montreal, Tampa Bay, and Carolina, who are among the best contenders, are staffed by excellent players who lead the league. I'd say that there are better players in the East, and that there are more serious contenders in the East. That's why I think the East is better.

That's my opinion. Take it or leave it.

I know it's your opinion, but you never gave me any reason to believe why the east was "much" better than the West. I expected with such a strong conviction that you'd have some concrete reasoning behind it. I mean, it seems like you made a post and figured out the flaws with your own argument and tried to use them against the Western Conference, because all you gave were generalities.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!