The Best Security/Cleaners For XP Service Pack 2


Recommended Posts

^ possibly not, but theres no 100% garanty. your anti-malware software will stop all known malware, and winpatrol will prevent system changes from the unknown, but theres nothing to stop an outward bound connection from the unknown.

a hardware firewall coupled with anti-malware software including winpatrol is a good set of layered defence and severly reduces your chances of a compromised machine, but i still maintain that its not as effective as adding in a software firewall to garanty nothing can establish a connection unless you permit it.

if you were infected with a new form of malware, or ran software that unknowingly was programmed or modified to create a malicious connection, your hardware firewall and anti-malware software will just sit there and do nothing.

a software firewall would imediately intercept and block the connection.

In my experience it's the total opposite of that..

A new trojan could easily be programmed to get around a software firewall or even disable it...it can't get around a hardware firewall which is limiting ports.

This happened recently to me, something I'd downloaded was trying to phone home but the hardware firewall saw it was trying to use a port I'd set as blocked and so it didn't allow the connection.

^ yes, there are ways to get around software firewalls, and where such methods are used a software firewall isnt going to be much use, but yet ports and traffic that your hardware firewall allows through are used, then your hardware firewall isn't going to help either.

a lot of stuff can be protected against without a software firewall, and some stuff can get through even with one, but you should still have one to block what it can.

essentially you havent experienced the oposite, you were just lucky your layered defences caught it.

Edited by TheBlazingAngel
^ possibly not, but theres no 100% garanty. your anti-malware software will stop all known malware, and winpatrol will prevent system changes from the unknown, but theres nothing to stop an outward bound connection from the unknown.

586851698[/snapback]

There is no 100% guarranty for anything but a firewall still doesn't help. If I don't get the malware in the first place, because winpatrol disables it from doing anything, then it CANNOT RUN and it CANNOT SEND outward bound connections. You download and run file x. It ATTEMPTS to add itself to startup, ATTEMPTS to add itself as a bho in your browser and ATTEMPTS to change associations with all your file types. Winpatrol prompts you for every change and you say no. It tells you were the file is located. Since it ISN'T RUNNING because winpatrol did not let it, even after you restarted it did not start with windows, you can fire up explorer and delete it manually. Bye bye file x. Even if you can't delete it, you use a typical spyware remover (ex. ms antispyware) to remove it, and it works flawlessly because it's not running, not starting up, didn't make any changes to your computer.

I haven't gotten a virus/spyware etc. ever since I started using winpatrol. I haven't used a software firewall because they are completely redundant and just waste resources. Winpatrol on the other hand is a must-have. And it's free. No, I don't work for them: I just know when I see good software.

http://www.winpatrol.com/

Edited by slimy
can i just point out that home hardware firewalls (inc. routers) should not be used as a replacement for a software firewall. corporate built ones with fully fledged ACL's (access control lists) might be a different matter, im not sure.

Wrong. There are no hardware firewalls. What everybody means with the term "hardware firewall" is actually a dedicated firewall. Hardware needs software to run in harmony and to make it controllable. If you want to control such a firewall you need to log into it and configure it using a webinterface, a management tool, etc.

Routers are also something completely different.

The "router" device people have at home to share their internet connection is a combination of devices: NAT, router, firewall.

It has a very simple basic firewall that is rule based. The rules you create only control what kind of packets are allowed and which aren't. They can only control ports and ip-addresses (deny certain clients in the network access to certain ports and/or ip-addresses, or do port forwarding/mapping, etc.).

hardware firewalls can be extremely good at filtering and blocking unwanted network traffic. however, you cant control what software on your computer can establish network connections.

this means, if you get infected with a trojan, there is nothing to stop it phoning home and establishing a connection to the cracker who created it, providing direct access right through your hardware firewall into your computer.

A software firewall can do the same. There are different types of firewalls. Some can only do packet filtering, others are a bit more intelligent and can do application filtering. Those firewalls can either be software or "hardware" (=dedicated firewall).

Besides that, there are lots of dedicated firewalls that provide software for clients in a network so the dedicated firewall can control all those clients e.g. push updates and policies to the clients and thus fully control what software on a client computer can establish a network connection.

I don't think I have to mention that these kind of firewalls are used in corporate situations and are not in those devices with which you can share your internet connection.

So if you are a home user with a device that enables you to share your internet connection which also has a basic firewall then get a firewall on you clients as well.

Because the firewall in the device only controls ports and ip-addresses and does not work on an application level (which most modern personal firewall do).

You then also have a firewall behind a firewall, so there is a second ring someone needs to break through.

Software firewall sucks because it takes up resources. Get a router. That combined with windows firewall (usually not necessary if behind a router and in a small/home network of computers ) should be sufficient.

Software firewalls so do not suck. Mine takes up 6k for memory and its highest is 8k, that's so little. Sure a hardware firewall is good, but why not have a software and hardware one? Windows firewall doesn't compare well to sygate, agnitum, or kerio.

BTW I tried ewido and its very good! It grabbed an svchost.exe backdoor. And 2 wildtangent spyware. Using a quickscan.

BTW I tried ewido and its very good! It grabbed an svchost.exe backdoor. And 2 wildtangent spyware. Using a quickscan.

Do a full scan and see what it picks up, its an amazing program, and when the guard expires just hit O.K, you've still got the scanner. Here's a review a guy I know did:

http://www.lunarsoft.net/index.php?ind=rev...try_view&iden=4

Ewido isn't really that good, it took a total of 20 minutes to scan my computer and only turned up with only 8 false positives and 5 cookies that I deleted with ccleaner anyways, no actual threats. It did however install a service set on disabled(wtf?) and a bho. Definitely not worth any money.

ewido sucks IMO i like spybot you fully forgot to mention spyware blaster, unless i missed something, winpatrol is also nice. I think Regsupreme is a superb piece of software for what it does.. also tune up

as for the firewall/antivirus i like my combo of sygate+nod32

Thanks for the list of software and comments about some. Been looking for something like this/

If you're talking about me - thanks.

Ewido isn't really that good, it took a total of 20 minutes to scan my computer and only turned up with only 8 false positives and 5 cookies that I deleted with ccleaner anyways, no actual threats. It did however install a service set on disabled(wtf?) and a bho. Definitely not worth any money.

Its free, just the shield expires after a period of time. I just unticked the options to do auto-update and shield when I installed it - which is why I called it an On-Demand scanner.

ewido sucks IMO i like spybot you fully forgot to mention spyware blaster, unless i missed something, winpatrol is also nice. I think Regsupreme is a superb piece of software for what it does.. also tune up

as for the firewall/antivirus i like my combo of sygate+nod32

Ewido is amazing - On Demand. I use the alternative of Arovax Shield rather than Spyware Blaster - take a look at it, uses next to nothing on system resources.

  • 2 weeks later...

What firewall uses 6 - 8k? Please enlighten us.

Heres an ss. Also Ewido full scan may take a little long, but it gets the job done. I use quickscan and memory scan. If things keep appearing in the memory, I use full scan. I haven't had anything yet ever since I got rid of those Worm.Rays.

post-77937-1134865974_thumb.jpg

Edited by Fighter-X
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • BrowserOS 0.46.0 by Razvan Serea BrowserOS is a free, open-source Chromium-based browser that runs AI agents natively, offering a smarter, more productive browsing experience. It supports Chrome extensions and integrates AI agents to automate tasks, fill forms, and streamline workflows. Your data stays on your computer: you can use your own API keys or run local models via Ollama, making it a privacy-first alternative to tools like Perplexity, Comet, or Dia. With built-in productivity tools and app integrations, BrowserOS boosts efficiency while keeping control firmly in your hands. Being Chromium-based, BrowserOS lets you effortlessly import your bookmarks, passwords, and Chrome extensions in just a few clicks. BrowserOS works with OpenAI GPT models, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, and local AI models via Ollama or LMStudio. You can use your own API keys and effortlessly switch between providers. BrowserOS Agent Your AI productivity assistant that organizes and manages your browsing effortlessly Quickly list, group, or close tabs Save and resume browsing sessions Search your history and organize bookmarks Switch instantly to the tab you need BrowserOS Navigator – Automate web tasks with ease Navigate websites and search automatically Interact with pages without manual effort Handle repetitive tasks in seconds What makes BrowserOS special Feels like home - same familiar interface as Google Chrome, works with all your extensions AI agents that run on YOUR browser, not in the cloud Privacy first - bring your own keys or use local models with Ollama. Your browsing history stays on your computer Open source and community driven - see exactly what's happening under the hood MCP store to one-click install popular MCPs and use them directly in the browser bar (coming soon) Built-in AI ad blocker that works across more scenarios! BrowserOS 0.46.0 changelog: Run Claude Code & Codex right in your browser — We've extended the agent harness to bring full coding agents into BrowserOS. Claude Code and Codex now come bundled and plug straight into the assistant, so you can drive your browser with the agent — and the subscription — you already use. A brand new experience — A redesigned new tab, a calmer composer, and a rebuilt command center for switching between agents. The whole assistant is cleaner, faster to reach, and easier to live in. New MCP tools — We rebuilt the browser tool surface from the ground up — a tighter, more reliable set of tools for agents to drive the browser. Plus one-click install of BrowserOS as an MCP server into the agents you already run, with automatic URL sync. Chromium 148 — Updated to the latest Chromium base with all recent upstream fixes and security patches. Streamlined — We've pulled back a few features that weren't getting much use — Skills, Soul, and Memory — so we can focus and ship better versions of them soon. Download: BrowserOS 0.46.0 | 181.0 MB (Open Source) Download: BrowserOS for macOS | 485.0 MB Links: BrowserOS Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally admits its default Windows 11 25H2, 24H2 action broke key legacy component by Sayan Sen Microsoft last week released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. So far the company has acknowledged two known issues that have popped up after the release which include bugged-out Office apps as well as the Recycle Bin; though there could be more at play too. Speaking of bugs and issues, Microsoft seems to have finally acknowledged a problem that probably has been around for close to a year. That's because back in July of 2025 the company made a default change to the latest Windows 11 versions, wherein it switched to JScript9Legacy on Windows 11 24H2 and later releases. Hence following the release of version 25H2 in October 2025, JScript9Legacy also remained default-enabled. As a result there has been a compatibility issue ever since then. For those wondering, by switching to JScript9Legacy Microsoft intended to improve the security of modern Windows PCs by reducing vulnerabilities tied to legacy scripting like cross-site scripting (XSS), among others. XSS exploits can allow cyber-attackers to attach malicious code onto legitimate websites and use them to execute the code when a potential victim loads such a website. Hence the new JScript9Legacy engine enforced stricter execution policies and improved object handling, which should help mitigate such attacks. Microsoft today has published a new support article detailing the problem. Neowin spotted it while browsing. The company says that JScript global definitions and execution context may fail to persist across scripts, potentially breaking older dependent apps and web-based components that relied on this legacy behavior. In the article Microsoft has confirmed that the issue stems from its move away from the older jscript9.dll engine in favor of jscript9legacy.dll. As mentioned above, while the newer engine was designed to address vulnerabilities and strengthen security it also changes how JScript handles execution context. As a result functions and definitions loaded by one script could no longer remain available to subsequent scripts once execution ended. The company notes that some applications worked correctly on earlier Windows versions because the older JScript engine automatically retained global definitions and execution state between scripts. Under the newer model though that behavior is disabled by default causing certain legacy workloads and polyfill-dependent scripts to fail. Microsoft says it addressed the problem via the KB5077241 update though the fix had not been enabled automatically in the following updates. As such admins must explicitly turn on persistent JScript execution context using a Registry setting that the tech giant shared today. The configuration can be applied to individual processes or system-wide through the FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE registry key. The steps have been outlined below: Run the following command to create the feature control registry key: reg add "HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE" Under this key, create a new DWORD (32-bit) value. Configure the value as follows: To enable persistence for specific processes only: Set the value to 1 for each target process name. To enable persistence for all processes: Add * as the key name and set its value to 1. You can find the official support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • The possibility that milk gathers back into a glass implies that gravity can be 'reversed'.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      590
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!