The Best Security/Cleaners For XP Service Pack 2


Recommended Posts

^ possibly not, but theres no 100% garanty. your anti-malware software will stop all known malware, and winpatrol will prevent system changes from the unknown, but theres nothing to stop an outward bound connection from the unknown.

a hardware firewall coupled with anti-malware software including winpatrol is a good set of layered defence and severly reduces your chances of a compromised machine, but i still maintain that its not as effective as adding in a software firewall to garanty nothing can establish a connection unless you permit it.

if you were infected with a new form of malware, or ran software that unknowingly was programmed or modified to create a malicious connection, your hardware firewall and anti-malware software will just sit there and do nothing.

a software firewall would imediately intercept and block the connection.

In my experience it's the total opposite of that..

A new trojan could easily be programmed to get around a software firewall or even disable it...it can't get around a hardware firewall which is limiting ports.

This happened recently to me, something I'd downloaded was trying to phone home but the hardware firewall saw it was trying to use a port I'd set as blocked and so it didn't allow the connection.

^ yes, there are ways to get around software firewalls, and where such methods are used a software firewall isnt going to be much use, but yet ports and traffic that your hardware firewall allows through are used, then your hardware firewall isn't going to help either.

a lot of stuff can be protected against without a software firewall, and some stuff can get through even with one, but you should still have one to block what it can.

essentially you havent experienced the oposite, you were just lucky your layered defences caught it.

Edited by TheBlazingAngel
^ possibly not, but theres no 100% garanty. your anti-malware software will stop all known malware, and winpatrol will prevent system changes from the unknown, but theres nothing to stop an outward bound connection from the unknown.

586851698[/snapback]

There is no 100% guarranty for anything but a firewall still doesn't help. If I don't get the malware in the first place, because winpatrol disables it from doing anything, then it CANNOT RUN and it CANNOT SEND outward bound connections. You download and run file x. It ATTEMPTS to add itself to startup, ATTEMPTS to add itself as a bho in your browser and ATTEMPTS to change associations with all your file types. Winpatrol prompts you for every change and you say no. It tells you were the file is located. Since it ISN'T RUNNING because winpatrol did not let it, even after you restarted it did not start with windows, you can fire up explorer and delete it manually. Bye bye file x. Even if you can't delete it, you use a typical spyware remover (ex. ms antispyware) to remove it, and it works flawlessly because it's not running, not starting up, didn't make any changes to your computer.

I haven't gotten a virus/spyware etc. ever since I started using winpatrol. I haven't used a software firewall because they are completely redundant and just waste resources. Winpatrol on the other hand is a must-have. And it's free. No, I don't work for them: I just know when I see good software.

http://www.winpatrol.com/

Edited by slimy
can i just point out that home hardware firewalls (inc. routers) should not be used as a replacement for a software firewall. corporate built ones with fully fledged ACL's (access control lists) might be a different matter, im not sure.

Wrong. There are no hardware firewalls. What everybody means with the term "hardware firewall" is actually a dedicated firewall. Hardware needs software to run in harmony and to make it controllable. If you want to control such a firewall you need to log into it and configure it using a webinterface, a management tool, etc.

Routers are also something completely different.

The "router" device people have at home to share their internet connection is a combination of devices: NAT, router, firewall.

It has a very simple basic firewall that is rule based. The rules you create only control what kind of packets are allowed and which aren't. They can only control ports and ip-addresses (deny certain clients in the network access to certain ports and/or ip-addresses, or do port forwarding/mapping, etc.).

hardware firewalls can be extremely good at filtering and blocking unwanted network traffic. however, you cant control what software on your computer can establish network connections.

this means, if you get infected with a trojan, there is nothing to stop it phoning home and establishing a connection to the cracker who created it, providing direct access right through your hardware firewall into your computer.

A software firewall can do the same. There are different types of firewalls. Some can only do packet filtering, others are a bit more intelligent and can do application filtering. Those firewalls can either be software or "hardware" (=dedicated firewall).

Besides that, there are lots of dedicated firewalls that provide software for clients in a network so the dedicated firewall can control all those clients e.g. push updates and policies to the clients and thus fully control what software on a client computer can establish a network connection.

I don't think I have to mention that these kind of firewalls are used in corporate situations and are not in those devices with which you can share your internet connection.

So if you are a home user with a device that enables you to share your internet connection which also has a basic firewall then get a firewall on you clients as well.

Because the firewall in the device only controls ports and ip-addresses and does not work on an application level (which most modern personal firewall do).

You then also have a firewall behind a firewall, so there is a second ring someone needs to break through.

Software firewall sucks because it takes up resources. Get a router. That combined with windows firewall (usually not necessary if behind a router and in a small/home network of computers ) should be sufficient.

Software firewalls so do not suck. Mine takes up 6k for memory and its highest is 8k, that's so little. Sure a hardware firewall is good, but why not have a software and hardware one? Windows firewall doesn't compare well to sygate, agnitum, or kerio.

BTW I tried ewido and its very good! It grabbed an svchost.exe backdoor. And 2 wildtangent spyware. Using a quickscan.

BTW I tried ewido and its very good! It grabbed an svchost.exe backdoor. And 2 wildtangent spyware. Using a quickscan.

Do a full scan and see what it picks up, its an amazing program, and when the guard expires just hit O.K, you've still got the scanner. Here's a review a guy I know did:

http://www.lunarsoft.net/index.php?ind=rev...try_view&iden=4

Ewido isn't really that good, it took a total of 20 minutes to scan my computer and only turned up with only 8 false positives and 5 cookies that I deleted with ccleaner anyways, no actual threats. It did however install a service set on disabled(wtf?) and a bho. Definitely not worth any money.

ewido sucks IMO i like spybot you fully forgot to mention spyware blaster, unless i missed something, winpatrol is also nice. I think Regsupreme is a superb piece of software for what it does.. also tune up

as for the firewall/antivirus i like my combo of sygate+nod32

Thanks for the list of software and comments about some. Been looking for something like this/

If you're talking about me - thanks.

Ewido isn't really that good, it took a total of 20 minutes to scan my computer and only turned up with only 8 false positives and 5 cookies that I deleted with ccleaner anyways, no actual threats. It did however install a service set on disabled(wtf?) and a bho. Definitely not worth any money.

Its free, just the shield expires after a period of time. I just unticked the options to do auto-update and shield when I installed it - which is why I called it an On-Demand scanner.

ewido sucks IMO i like spybot you fully forgot to mention spyware blaster, unless i missed something, winpatrol is also nice. I think Regsupreme is a superb piece of software for what it does.. also tune up

as for the firewall/antivirus i like my combo of sygate+nod32

Ewido is amazing - On Demand. I use the alternative of Arovax Shield rather than Spyware Blaster - take a look at it, uses next to nothing on system resources.

  • 2 weeks later...

What firewall uses 6 - 8k? Please enlighten us.

Heres an ss. Also Ewido full scan may take a little long, but it gets the job done. I use quickscan and memory scan. If things keep appearing in the memory, I use full scan. I haven't had anything yet ever since I got rid of those Worm.Rays.

post-77937-1134865974_thumb.jpg

Edited by Fighter-X
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • 1. Define "better". 2. It's still more expensive than equivalent PCs so...
    • Major Xbox layoffs may claim South of Midnight developer Compulsion entirely by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft has been making major changes in its gaming wing Xbox for a few months now, including the appointment of a new CEO, a large number of leadership changes, and strategy shifts. However, the company is seemingly also looking at initiating a major layoffs wave at Xbox and perhaps even a studio closure. The new report lands from Kotaku, Xbox first-party developer Compulsion Games is being shuttered soon by Microsoft. For those unfamiliar with the studio, it's the team behind Contrast (2013), We Happy Few (2018), and South of Midnight (2025). Its latest game was quite well received, even winning a Peabody Award for its writing. It even received a 9/10 in Neowin's own review, highlighting its engaging storyline, gorgeous world, and curious characters. The studio joined Xbox Game Studios in 2018, just as Microsoft announced it is acquiring Playground Games, Undead Labs, and Ninja Theory. Despite recent listings for new staff roles, according to the new report, Compulsion Games is being closed entirely, with over 90 staff being let go. Kotaku also added that the studio's leadership is in negotiations with Microsoft about this decision, but no official details have been revealed yet. The report lands just as two senior managers of Xbox leave their posts at Microsoft Gaming. Head of Xbox Game Studios Craig Duncan and chief of staff Louise O'Connor originally began their journey in Rare and have been a part of Xbox for over two decades. Dunkan has been responsible for games like Kinect Sports and Sea of Thieves, while O'Connor was primarily working on Rare's Everwild project before its cancelation. If this report about the studio shutdown is accurate, this may just be the start of a major new layoffs wave at Xbox Game Studios. There are also rumors of Arkane Studios being heavily affected. As always, take all these reports with a grain of salt until something official materializes from Microsoft or the studios.
    • The flaw with this analysis is that this laptop has a cellphone CPU in it. In the Intel world, that would be an N150 and those are everywhere, even in low end laptops. You can get an N150 based NUC with 16GB RAM and 256GB-512GB SSD... NOT soldered in... for < $500 Canadian (around US$360). The problem is two fold: tech bloggers/writers on most tech site (like this one, ironically) overvalue Apple and apparently aren't in the same earnings class as most regular people. As a result, we get breathless articles about how everyone needs a folding phone when most people just cannot afford one... or really need one. And we get Apple used as the baseline metric regardless of whether that comparison makes any sense. If Dell or HP released a retail laptop with a cellphone motherboard, you'd be all over them for doing that - but Apple does it and it's genius. I see articles suggesting what Samsung - a company that basically started the foldable phone market and has built them for eight years - needs to do to compete with Apple's unreleased, unspecced and unseen folding phone. Sorry, no - if the Neo (really creative name there BTW - still, better than the Go, the other "creative" product name everyone's using) encourages PC makers to make cellphone laptops using lower end ARM processors, we all lose. It's a step backwards and a capitulation to the fact that semiconductor makers and computer OEMs (and tech bloggers) have totally lost the plot.
    • Everyone should install this extension and ignore games that use AI. https://chromewebstore.google....nnigaaeelfkeomjcngmnh?pli=1 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ai-warning-for-steam/
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      82
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!