Linux distro with ONLY shell (NO GUI) : Which one?


Recommended Posts

If he REALLY wants to learn linux, then I'd reccomend Linux from Scratch (http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/)

It is extremely flexible; install only what you want. The instructions are very comprehensive, making it perfect for learning the deep, dark innards of Linux.

I'de say Debian Sarge, as it has excellent security support and doesn't take more than 10 mins to set up a headless system. Etch if you need more up-to-date software (there is still securoty support with Etch, note if you want to use unstable for a server there is no security support - but the latest packages have most fixes).

For ease of use I'd say SUSE is the best as you can use YAST over ssh, and it's also better for compatibility with commercial apps.

Most distros allow you to select an option that will install a bare-bones console system, though it can be hard to find in some installers.

My recommendations:

Slackware or Debian if he doesn't want to start from scratch with compiling the entire thing. It's well optimized for speed, and lets him compile other stuff he needs from source tarballs. Debian has the additional advantage of having apt-get which is in many users' opinion THE ultimate package management system (and I can't say I disagree).

Gentoo stage3 install has extensive documentation that is very easy to follow, and you can set up an ssh server on the LiveCD to do the install from another computer. Apparently stage1 and stage2 aren't supported anymore for whatever reason. Gentoo's Portage is also an excellent package-management system that is a joy to use, though a bit more difficult to get to grips with than apt-get (IMHO). Gentoo is very tweakable though it had been even more so if they still approved of doing stage1 or stage2 installs.

Linux From Scratch - I personally have not tried this, but I gather it is similar to a Gentoo stage1 install (which is fun, but takes ages!). After Gentoo stopped supporting stage1 installs, this is as far as I know the only distro that lets you start from the very beginning and tweak every little tiny bit of the system.

Linux From Scratch and Gentoo are probably best suited for a high-end machine as the time required to compile may deter any practical use on a slow machine (say, Pentium II or older).

  Quote
The advised method now is to do a stage3 installation and optionally recompile the system after the installation. That will create an optimized system as well. How to proceed a real stage1 or stage2 installation is still described in the FAQ.

The reason behind this was due to the massive influx of users new to linux screwing up their base system by trying to do a stage 1/2 install. It's still very much supported, but just no longer recommended as the default.

My favorite distro's over the years have been debian, slackware, and gentoo.

Slackware's great because its full install is just what i'm looking for, plus it just seems nice. It feels like its really unixyee -- i think they claim to be the most unix like linux distrobution?

Gentoo is good for its excellent community and documentation, although it is by no means easy. Its probably as hard as you get. Portage is also a great package system

Debian has the great packge manager apt-get, which makes installing programs and maintaining them so very easy. Although I stopped using it sometime before sarge went stable, it was rock-solid and secure, and worked great, especially on my older hardware.

Gentoo would be really diving in the deep end, but a slackware install would be great for learning linux without gettting totally bogged down. Debian's nice too.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft is removing legacy drivers from Windows Update by Usama Jawad Last month, we learned that Microsoft is making major changes to the development of hardware drivers in Windows. This included the retirement of Windows Metadata and Internet Services (WMIS), along with the process for pre-production driver signing. Now, the Redmond tech firm has informed partners that it will be getting rid of old drivers in Windows Update. In what is being described as a "strategic" move to improve the security posture and compatibility of Windows, Microsoft has announced that it will be performing a cleanup of legacy drivers that are still being delivered through Windows Update. Right now, the first phase only targets drivers that already have modern replacements present in Windows Update. As a part of its cleanup process, Microsoft will expire legacy drivers so that it is not offered to any system. This expiration involves removing audience segments in the Hardware Development Center. Partners can still republish a driver that was deemed as legacy by Microsoft, but the firm may require a justification. Once the Redmond tech giant completes its first phase of this cleanup, it will give partners a six-month grace period to share any concerns. However, if no concerns are brought forward, the drivers will be permanently eradicated from Windows Update. Microsoft has emphasized that this will be a regular activity moving forward and while the current phase only targets legacy drivers with newer replacements, the next phases may expand the scope of this cleanup and remove other drivers too. That said, each time the company takes a step in this direction, it will inform partners so that there is transparency between both parties. Microsoft believes that this move will help improve the security posture of Windows and ensure that an optimized set of drivers is offered to end-users. The firm has asked partners to review their drivers in Hardware Program so that there are no unexpected surprises during this cleanup process.
    • No idea, but I had a client the other week that lost the entire drive to it. I suggested relying on the Samsung T7's instead. The Sandisk Extreme's had reliability issues too.
    • I use it every day so personally yes I need it, or rather I want it. I use OpenShell though, not the garbage modern Start Menu. I just counted and at the moment I have a total of 92 program shortcuts organized into six folders almost exactly the way I did back in Windows 95. I can get to any program I want to run very quickly. I never use Search to find or run programs.
    • I do miss the Apps view from Windows 8.1 Update.
    • I use the search function and little else since Windows 11 (but there are times where Saved Searches take precedence since the search feature on the Start menu is worse than before). I use other features in previous releases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      lethalman went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Wayne Robinson earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Karan Khanna earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Karan Khanna earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      MikeK13 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      664
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      262
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      212
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      168
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      156
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!