Linux distro with ONLY shell (NO GUI) : Which one?


Recommended Posts

If he REALLY wants to learn linux, then I'd reccomend Linux from Scratch (http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/)

It is extremely flexible; install only what you want. The instructions are very comprehensive, making it perfect for learning the deep, dark innards of Linux.

I'de say Debian Sarge, as it has excellent security support and doesn't take more than 10 mins to set up a headless system. Etch if you need more up-to-date software (there is still securoty support with Etch, note if you want to use unstable for a server there is no security support - but the latest packages have most fixes).

For ease of use I'd say SUSE is the best as you can use YAST over ssh, and it's also better for compatibility with commercial apps.

Most distros allow you to select an option that will install a bare-bones console system, though it can be hard to find in some installers.

My recommendations:

Slackware or Debian if he doesn't want to start from scratch with compiling the entire thing. It's well optimized for speed, and lets him compile other stuff he needs from source tarballs. Debian has the additional advantage of having apt-get which is in many users' opinion THE ultimate package management system (and I can't say I disagree).

Gentoo stage3 install has extensive documentation that is very easy to follow, and you can set up an ssh server on the LiveCD to do the install from another computer. Apparently stage1 and stage2 aren't supported anymore for whatever reason. Gentoo's Portage is also an excellent package-management system that is a joy to use, though a bit more difficult to get to grips with than apt-get (IMHO). Gentoo is very tweakable though it had been even more so if they still approved of doing stage1 or stage2 installs.

Linux From Scratch - I personally have not tried this, but I gather it is similar to a Gentoo stage1 install (which is fun, but takes ages!). After Gentoo stopped supporting stage1 installs, this is as far as I know the only distro that lets you start from the very beginning and tweak every little tiny bit of the system.

Linux From Scratch and Gentoo are probably best suited for a high-end machine as the time required to compile may deter any practical use on a slow machine (say, Pentium II or older).

  Quote
The advised method now is to do a stage3 installation and optionally recompile the system after the installation. That will create an optimized system as well. How to proceed a real stage1 or stage2 installation is still described in the FAQ.

The reason behind this was due to the massive influx of users new to linux screwing up their base system by trying to do a stage 1/2 install. It's still very much supported, but just no longer recommended as the default.

My favorite distro's over the years have been debian, slackware, and gentoo.

Slackware's great because its full install is just what i'm looking for, plus it just seems nice. It feels like its really unixyee -- i think they claim to be the most unix like linux distrobution?

Gentoo is good for its excellent community and documentation, although it is by no means easy. Its probably as hard as you get. Portage is also a great package system

Debian has the great packge manager apt-get, which makes installing programs and maintaining them so very easy. Although I stopped using it sometime before sarge went stable, it was rock-solid and secure, and worked great, especially on my older hardware.

Gentoo would be really diving in the deep end, but a slackware install would be great for learning linux without gettting totally bogged down. Debian's nice too.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • They already are small. Have you seen the size of Linux icons?
    • I thought I could download the ringtone.
    • Foxconn to make iPhone casings in India as Apple shifts more production from China by Sagar Naresh Bhavsar It was recently reported that Donald Trump was unhappy with Tim Cook and threatened Apple with a 25% tariff if iPhones weren't produced in America. While the exact reason is unclear, some speculated that Trump's anger had to do with Cook skipping the Middle East trip with him, which was attended by other major company CEOs. Many believed that Apple came under the radar because of its plans for a $1.5 billion iPhone production plant in India. True or not, Apple is facing a tough situation as Trump has already imposed hefty tariffs on China, where the majority of iPhones are made. In a move to reduce dependence on China, Apple planned to shift its production from China to India, where tariffs are relatively lower. In line with this, a fresh report by The Economic Times suggests that Apple's iPhone assembler, Foxconn, has decided to start producing iPhone casings in India. Sources claim that a new unit is being planned at the ESR Industrial Park in Oragadam, Tamil Nadu. The area is close to the upcoming display module manufacturing plant. Until now, Tata Electronics was the one producing iPhone casings in India. However, Foxconn, which was assembling iPhones in the country at its plant in Sriperumbudur, will start making iPhone casings as well. This move suggests that Foxconn is helping Apple move more production out of China to India. Prabhu Ram, vice president, industry research group, CyberMedia Research, said, Foxconn has already ramped up its India push. The company recently started production of Apple AirPods in Hyderabad for exports and is also setting up an iPhone production plant in Bengaluru. Casings only make up about 2-3% of the total iPhone cost, making them locally helps Apple reduce costs, and also helps avoid hefty tariffs.
    • I loved the initial compact Start Menu present in Windows 10. It was tiny, awesome and super fast without any Store apps clutter.
    • BBC threatens Perplexity with legal action over content scraping by Paul Hill Image via Depositphotos.com The UK’s public broadcaster, BBC, has written a letter to Perplexity, the AI search startup, asking it to stop scraping articles from its websites, delete existing copies of content, and propose some sort of financial compensation if it would like to carry on scraping data. If the demands are not met, BBC may seek an injunction against the startup citing alleged misuse of its intellectual property. BBC is probably responding in this way because it has seen other news organizations cement deals with firms like OpenAI and Mistral. The income stream allows news organizations to raise more funds and also cover the costs of the extra load on their servers caused by AI scraping. For anybody not familiar with Perplexity, it’s a bit like ChatGPT but has a much stronger emphasis on searching the web to find information. You can ask it anything you want to know about and it very quickly searches online and constructs a specific response to your question based on what it has found. The company offers many of its features for free, but does have Perplexity Pro, which costs money. Essentially, Perplexity is making money from publishers by using their content to improve its own product, but not paying them all. Perplexity's defense and existing publisher programs In a statement to the Financial Times, Perplexity labeled the BBC’s claims as "manipulative and opportunistic". The startup accused the broadcaster of having “a fundamental misunderstanding of technology, the internet and intellectual property law.” This is not the first time Perplexity has had a run-in with the media. Forbes and Wired accused it of plagiarizing content from their websites and The New York Times sent the company a cease and desist notice to stop using its content for AI purposes. To assuage publishers, Perplexity has set up a revenue sharing program, which includes TIME, Fortune, Der Spiegel, and others. According to Digiday, the revenue share was up to 25%. It’s not clear if BBC has tried engaging through this avenue or if it wants to try to squeeze the startup for a bigger slice. The escalating battle over AI and intellectual property Even if you only keep up with AI developments in passing, you’ll likely have seen that AI models need to be trained on vast amounts of data, much of which is copyrighted. There is an ongoing debate about whether these companies should be allowed to train on this data, or first seek out permission from the copyright holders. The move from the BBC could spur other publishers on to try and get themselves a better deal from Perplexity. Alternatively, Perplexity could remove BBC content from its platform and stop pulling information from there. It could probably find most of the information elsewhere, but if Perplexity tried to pull this too much it would eventually end up pretty useless with not a lot of content. Overall, this is just one of many ongoing legal issues surrounding AI, but once a conclusion has been reached, it could set a precedent about how AI companies should go about getting content from publishers. Source: FT via Reuters
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      KynanSEIT earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      gowtham07 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      lethalman went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Wayne Robinson earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Karan Khanna earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      678
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      274
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      220
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      171
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      160
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!