Linux distro with ONLY shell (NO GUI) : Which one?


Recommended Posts

If he REALLY wants to learn linux, then I'd reccomend Linux from Scratch (http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/)

It is extremely flexible; install only what you want. The instructions are very comprehensive, making it perfect for learning the deep, dark innards of Linux.

I'de say Debian Sarge, as it has excellent security support and doesn't take more than 10 mins to set up a headless system. Etch if you need more up-to-date software (there is still securoty support with Etch, note if you want to use unstable for a server there is no security support - but the latest packages have most fixes).

For ease of use I'd say SUSE is the best as you can use YAST over ssh, and it's also better for compatibility with commercial apps.

Most distros allow you to select an option that will install a bare-bones console system, though it can be hard to find in some installers.

My recommendations:

Slackware or Debian if he doesn't want to start from scratch with compiling the entire thing. It's well optimized for speed, and lets him compile other stuff he needs from source tarballs. Debian has the additional advantage of having apt-get which is in many users' opinion THE ultimate package management system (and I can't say I disagree).

Gentoo stage3 install has extensive documentation that is very easy to follow, and you can set up an ssh server on the LiveCD to do the install from another computer. Apparently stage1 and stage2 aren't supported anymore for whatever reason. Gentoo's Portage is also an excellent package-management system that is a joy to use, though a bit more difficult to get to grips with than apt-get (IMHO). Gentoo is very tweakable though it had been even more so if they still approved of doing stage1 or stage2 installs.

Linux From Scratch - I personally have not tried this, but I gather it is similar to a Gentoo stage1 install (which is fun, but takes ages!). After Gentoo stopped supporting stage1 installs, this is as far as I know the only distro that lets you start from the very beginning and tweak every little tiny bit of the system.

Linux From Scratch and Gentoo are probably best suited for a high-end machine as the time required to compile may deter any practical use on a slow machine (say, Pentium II or older).

  Quote
The advised method now is to do a stage3 installation and optionally recompile the system after the installation. That will create an optimized system as well. How to proceed a real stage1 or stage2 installation is still described in the FAQ.

The reason behind this was due to the massive influx of users new to linux screwing up their base system by trying to do a stage 1/2 install. It's still very much supported, but just no longer recommended as the default.

My favorite distro's over the years have been debian, slackware, and gentoo.

Slackware's great because its full install is just what i'm looking for, plus it just seems nice. It feels like its really unixyee -- i think they claim to be the most unix like linux distrobution?

Gentoo is good for its excellent community and documentation, although it is by no means easy. Its probably as hard as you get. Portage is also a great package system

Debian has the great packge manager apt-get, which makes installing programs and maintaining them so very easy. Although I stopped using it sometime before sarge went stable, it was rock-solid and secure, and worked great, especially on my older hardware.

Gentoo would be really diving in the deep end, but a slackware install would be great for learning linux without gettting totally bogged down. Debian's nice too.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Someone not paying the BBC license at home is a minor inconvenience to BBC. The real problem are these Ai companies STEALING data through scraping and then selling it under their product. Just pirating something for personal use is nowhere near as bad as stealing it to make corporate profits.
    • Vivaldi 7.4.3684.55 is out.
    • Nvidia and Foxconn planning to deploy humanoid robots within months by Paul Hill Never mind intellectual work, Foxconn and Nvidia are now in talks to deploy humanoid robots at Foxconn’s new Houston factory to carry out physical work, Reuters has reported. The two companies want to have the robots operational by the first quarter of 2026. This is a big development for both companies; it marks the first time Nvidia products will be made with robot assistance, and the first time Foxconn has used robots in an AI server factory on a production line. While the development is certainly interesting, and potentially bad for factory workers, we do not know many of the details such as which robots are being planned for use at the factory, what they’ll look like, or how many will be deployed. While Foxconn has trialed robots made by Chinese firm UBTech, the report states that Foxconn is developing its own robots with Nvidia. The news was told to Reuters via unnamed sources who are not allowed to discuss the matter, so they did so under anonymity. They said that the robots will start work early next year and will contribute to the production of Nvidia’s GB300 AI servers. Foxconn has been training the robots to pick and place objects, insert cables, and do assembly work, but it’s not clear exactly what their role will be on the factory floor and whether jobs will be impacted. One of the sources that spoke to Reuters said that the Houston factory was the best place to trial the robots because it is more spacious, giving robots more room to move about. Last month, a Foxconn subsidiary, which is in charge of the group’s AI server business, said there were two robots being developed which are expected to be showcased in November. One of the robots will have legs, while the other will use a wheeled autonomous mobile robot base. Predictably, the latter version will cost less money than the one with legs, but pricing is unknown at this point. Reuters noted that these two businesses are not the only ones working on robots. It also said that Mercedes-Benz and BMW have been testing robots on production lines and that Tesla is developing its own robots too. China is also getting heavily invested in the sector. Jensen Huang, head of Nvidia, believes that they will be in wide use in manufacturing facilities within five years.
    • That's great and all, but humans have a finite range of vision and a rather slow reaction time. I live in a rural area too and the roads are painted with dear carcasses most of the year. It's not because people choose to hit them. A human simply can't react quick enough when they come firing out of the woods perpendicular to your vision. Those issues can and are being solved with machine vision. The industrial world has been doing this for many years already and cars are finally jumping on the bandwagon using the same technology. It's a known fact that driving is the most dangerous thing (most) people do every day, and that's solely because humans are driving. It's one thing to use technology to be lazy, but it's another to use it to be safe and save lives.
    • Microsoft doesn't make AMD drivers. The "AMD" driver on Windows update comes from AMD, its AMD decision to put it there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      emptyother earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Crunchy6 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      KynanSEIT earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      gowtham07 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      lethalman went up a rank
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      673
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      274
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      218
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      165
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      163
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!