Computers or Sex?


Computers or Sex?  

503 members have voted

  1. 1. Computers or Sex?

    • Computers
      130
    • Sex
      373


Recommended Posts

if my girl ever said, choose your PC, or me.. i'd be on neowin the next day telling you guys what happened

btw.. im not kidding.

/me cuts off lylesback2's p3nor... also does the new eunuch a favor and gives him a new AMD FX-60(e-p3nor) :shiftyninja:

There u go, happy now? :woot: :rofl: :p

Edited by fr8t

Ohhh that was hilarious....

And dude are you kidding? your, i dunno, you seem like the 30second kind of guy, but whatever it is, that small blast of sex, few hours at most, maybe every few days, (it wont be everday for the rest of your life if it is now) is better than hours of doing what YOU want on your PC?

But im actually quite surprised that 30% has agreed :woot:

listen up champ... there is no need for a personal attack, you are the one who started this thread... deal with the replies or dont post crap in the first place

WTF stupid thread, gets 1star vote from me. :cool:

No doubt. Here we go cluttering up the new Neowin with dumb stuff like this! Who gives a crap if you're a perv and would rather twittle your keyboard then fool around with a woman! This is such a stupid thread I think original poster OWES us a star, not give them a 1 star rating! :wacko:

At least as of my posting there are 58 other pervs like you!!

I code Java, play Tetris and browse Neowin while kissing and caressing my girlfriend.

We're still virgins and I think that cuddles, kissing and all intimate items are surely better than sex.

Null Vote?

WTF stupid thread, gets 1star vote from me. :cool:

I gave it a Vote1-off.png!

Ok what da **** was the question? Which that I'd prefer to live without? and people voted sex? hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm :shiftyninja:

Yeah, I made that mistake. I saw "Computers" and "Sex" so there goes my hormones.

I'd prefer to live without COMPUTERS.

Human Nature wins.

Ok what da **** was the question? Which that I'd prefer to live without? and people voted sex? hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm :shiftyninja:

Yeah, I made that mistake. I saw "Computers" and "Sex" so there goes my hormones.

I'd prefer to live without COMPUTERS.

The question is unclear, it just says "Computers or Sex" so it's open to interpretation if that implies 'with' or 'without', usually when a question like that is asked it means 'with'. I'm sure that the question was asked more clearly it would be close to 100% to live with sex, without computers.

if my girl ever said, choose your PC, or me.. i'd be on neowin the next day telling you guys what happened :rofl:

btw.. im not kidding.

agreeed, :wub: neowin, and besides sex isnt everything....Computers pretty much control everything now adays, Try and go about your daily rutine without using a Computer of some sort. You cant.

Picture this:

your hot girlfriend is begging you for sex and you say: Not now baby, i am playing WoW, or I am checking the Neowin Forum.

I don't think so!

You're right there... that pretty much sums it up. I don't think it's possible this day and age to go completely without either of them, but I think that if someone said "ok, you can go play around on the computer or play around with your gf right now." i would definately take my girlfriend over my computer any day. :hump:

Sometimes I need to read these threads just to find out if people really think these things and feel the need to discuss it.

I'm sorry Ms. Portman, I've love to go to town on you but I made this promise to these guys on a forum and, well...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Python programmers in a nutshell. Now, guess what lang most AI programmers use... :-)
    • There was nothing whatsoever wrong with Vista as an OS after the SP1 update. People who claim it wasn't were using ancient machines for some silly reason. Not kidding, no hyperbole/exaggeration. Vista was good.
    • Windows ME was worse.
    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      443
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!