Collection of Untouched High Resolution Wallpapers


Recommended Posts

some of them (i believe four) are "touched" .

all the "bliss" walls and the aero flower ...... :cool:

but anyways its a nice collection :)

Those are all untouched except Aero Flower is not possible to confirm since it is leaked wall. Longhorn Bliss walls are untouched, got them from my installed LH. There is Bliss.bmp versions in the web/wallpaper folder and lnghrnm5.jpg (4053 build) and lnghrnm6.jpg (4074 build) windows/system32 folder. Also Energy Bliss is from installed MCE 2005, it's much higher resolution than the one MS released for XP with royale.

Those are all untouched except Aero Flower is not possible to confirm since it is leaked wall. Longhorn Bliss walls are untouched, got them from my installed LH. There is Bliss.bmp versions in the web/wallpaper folder and lnghrnm5.jpg (4053 build) and lnghrnm6.jpg (4074 build) windows/system32 folder. Also Energy Bliss is from installed MCE 2005, it's much higher resolution than the one MS released for XP with royale.

the "aeroflower/flower/uex wall 17" or whatever the name is has a much higher resolution . its above

3000 X xxx . and as u said some of the "bliss" came in the .bmp format .

soooo these are not untouched :)

but it really doesn't matter ..... :cool:

the "aeroflower/flower/uex wall 17" or whatever the name is has a much higher resolution . its above

3000 X xxx . and as u said some of the "bliss" came in the .bmp format .

soooo these are not untouched :)

but it really doesn't matter ..... :cool:

What I was trying to say was that when you search your installed LH 40XX drive, there is both jpeg and bmp version found in different folders and with different names. bmp is in windows/web/wallpaper and is named Bliss.bmp (in both LH builds), jpeg version is in windows/system32 and is named as lnghrnm5.jpg (build 4053) or lnghrnm6.jpg (build 4074).

Edited by Joni_78
  • 5 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
    • You could disable this "functionality/feature/whatever" with 2 registry keys, ages ago.
    • My Photos app is version 2026.11050.1001.0 and it remembers the window size and position. My Snipping Tool is version 11.2602.49.0 and it can capture the taskbar.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!