• 0

[VB] Programs getting constant 'COMDLG32.OCX' errors


Question

All of my VB programs seem to be getting this error...

"Component 'COMDLG32.OCX' or one of its dependencies not correctly registered: a file is missing or invalid"

Some people get it, and some people don't, it's very weird. Anyone know how I might remedy this problem?

8 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  Quote
Originally posted by zivan56

Your users need the VB Runtimes, or if you just put the file in system32, you need to run:

regsvr32 comdlg32.ocx

So that the component is registered. Or you can just use this to auto install it for your users

Tried some tests with users, but they're still getting errors even after installing the VB6 runtimes.

"Hmm, I downloaded VB6 Runtime and the generator, but I got an error message. It says it failed to load CommonDialog from COMDLG32.OCX..."

Another user got the same message but it failed to load StatusBar. This is very odd...it works on some systems but not on others.

  • 0
  Quote
Originally posted by Oogle

Not too familiar with VB, but isn't there a way to statically link the runtime libraries? That way, people don't have to download extra stuff. I know you can do it with MFC runtime libraries...

Microsoft had to be really stupid and decide not to include any VB runtime files in Windows itself.

  • 0

Microsoft includes the runtimes into Windows.

Windows 95 doesn't have any runtime libraries for Visual Basic.

Windows 98 has runtimes for Visual Basic 5.

Windows Me has Visual Basic 6 runtimes (I think).

Windows 2000 and XP should have Visual Basic 6 runtimes.

The final version of Windows.NET should have runtime libraries for the .NET framework. ;)

DLL for VB1: vbrun100.dll or just vbrun.dll ?

DLL for VB2: vbrun200.dll

DLL for VB3: vbrun300.dll

DLL for VB4: vb400.dll (I think)

DLL for VB5: msvbvm50.dll

DLL for VB6: msvbvm60.dll

(MSVBVM = Microsoft Visual Basic Virutal Machine)

OCX files are not a part of the so called runtime libraries.

When I programmed in VB6 I tried not to use OCX files, so I used APIs instead.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung Electronics has multiple subsidiaries. Samsung Display is a subsidiary that deals in screen manufacturing, it's a supply chain-based company where the staff solely care about manufacturing displays. Samsung Electronic's TV and Phone division may have other priorities, for example Samsung TV didn't want to go in on OLED because margins were lower when building the entire TV. Samsung Display's entire existence however now depends on OLED as they couldn't undercut Chinese LCD manufacturers but could compete against LG Display who is the only competitor in that market. Samsung Display has this screen manufacturing investment, but Samsung Mobile may not be willing to reduce their margins for going with a display technology that eats into the phone margins.
    • The weather looks gorgeous, I love the atmosphere of this new area.
    • Similar to what started me on the path to switching to Linux... for the first 6mo of Win10 it was installing an AMD GPU driver that broke audio over HDMI which was essential to me. Driver from AMDs site was fine.
    • I have avoided many deer, a few moose, and other smaller animals during my years of driving and have managed just fine with only ABS and ESP, both of which can also be problematic depending on circumstance. I have never feared driving and I live in a rural area with a lot of deer and other animals. Winter or summer, heavy rain or sunshine, night or day, I always prefer and like to drive myself, and I drive constantly in my job. People die in accidents and they always will, that is a fact of life. Something like self-driving busses I can advocate for because they can be set to drive on static routes that always stay the same - i.e. those routes can be specially designed and maintained for them. I've already seen enough idiots doing random idiotic things with their Tesla autodrives that I would rather see them crash and burn because of their own stupidity instead of their "computer failing". I've also been a PC and tech enthusiast of over 25 years so I I'm fine with tech but I want to be the one who uses it, and decides how much of it I use. I also do not want it to make my hands, feet and brain obsolete. For me it's not really about if a computer can do it but about people not having to do things themselves (responsibly). I think that basic driving education should be done with a manual car and these "automatic only" cards should not exist (yes, I'm European and we drive a lot of manual cars, I even prefer them). If a person doesn't have enough coordination to manage a steering wheel, shitfer and pedals, how on Earth are they able to react to any unforseen situation on the road? And giving them autodrive doesn't make me feel any better if the person behind the wheel can't manage even basic driving themselves. One of the things I hate most in today's society (in general) is how pretty much everything that is considered even a bit dangerous is eliminated instead of educating people to assess risks and avoid problems themselves. Instead we make brains obsolete by building systems that do everything for us.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      KynanSEIT earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      gowtham07 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      lethalman went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Wayne Robinson earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Karan Khanna earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      674
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      274
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      219
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      170
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      161
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!