Fluxbox, Blackbox, Openbox? Oh my!


Recommended Posts

Why are there 3 different types of *box window managers? I'm wondering this because I recently added Openbox to my Ubuntu install and I also have Blackbox. Also the bigger related question is; which one is better? What does Black, Flux, or Openbox have that the others don't? I found Openbox a bit harder to configure, but easy to pair up with different compoents to make a custom desktop.

So, what is your opinion on the Great Box Battle?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/414348-fluxbox-blackbox-openbox-oh-my/
Share on other sites

Think of it likes branches in a tree. Blackbox was the trunk of the tree, it was developed with a certain ideal in mind. Now, being open source, someone can take the source to blackbox, and be like "this is good, but I think it would be better if we did this and this and this", and branch off from there. Basically, its just different ways for different people to envision the same ideal. "We want it to be like this, and this is how we are going to get there". Its all about choice. :)

My first *box was fluxbox. I liked it, so have had no need to look at anything else. Rezza here uses Openbox, I think.

All three are very lightweight, and I cannot distinguish between them (having not tried anything but flux, all I can do is look at screenshots and to compare feature lists). It does appear that Blackbox does not support pixmaps for Window Decorations, it would appear

Once I tried flux, I never went back to any other (heavier) WM or DE.

Edited by markjensen

*box would be lighter on resources than metacity, but if you are using it in Gnome, you still have a lot of overhead.

You might want to try a *box environment by itself, if you like lightweight.

Edited by markjensen

I've tried Fluxbox on it's own, and now I'm trying Openbox on it's own paired up with Rox-Desktop and Fbpanel right now (check out Unix Desktop Thread for screenshot). Now, just gotta force it to use my configuration in my home folder (Currently, it's in the right spot but it won't work).

Openbox does not support pixmap based themes either (or at least I have not found any themes for Openbox that do :p).

Openbox uses XML for it's config files, which can be a little unforgiving if you get the syntax wrong, or if you're unfamilliar with XML.

I find that the level of configuration of mouse and keyboard actions / shortcuts in Openbox is much higher than any other wm I've tried. (is there even a fluxbox mouse config file?)

For example Openbox lets you define mouse actions in every context (whereas most wm's make you use the default actions etc).

As ViperSnake says, Openbox works well when paired up with other apps to make a combined desktop, but I haven't managed to achieve this so well with fluxbox..

I find that Openbox is also more lightweight than fluxbox. Flux can take an extra 5 or 6 seconds to load up, whereas Openbox is almost instantaneous.

Having said this, I would use flux over Open if I could resolve a couple of issues.. :p

My Openbox is Openbox 3.1, and after awhile with the default theme I installed Obconf off of APT and started real configuration!

Real configuration involves a text editor, understanding of the system and a precious little else :cool:
Fluxbox doesn't have a GTK based configuration utility, nah na na nah nah!

sudo apt-get install fluxconf

:shiftyninja:

I really like Openbox, but I don't like the lack of a panel. I've tried a bunch of them and ultimately ended up with pypanel. My only complaint: whenever pypanel crashes, it takes all the tray applications with it.

I really like Openbox, but I don't like the lack of a panel. I've tried a bunch of them and ultimately ended up with pypanel. My only complaint: whenever pypanel crashes, it takes all the tray applications with it.

I agree, pypanel rocks :D How stable do you find it? It's only ever crashed a couple of times on startup for me..

I agree, pypanel rocks :D How stable do you find it? It's only ever crashed a couple of times on startup for me..

I actually really like pypanel. Incredibly fast, but I don't like the lack of the right-click menu on the taskbar items. As for crashing, it doesn't do it very often, but its always out of the blue. Everytime it does it, its always because of a tray application.

Fluxbox is probably the most popular. Flux is what you get when you take the early blackbox code and run with it - eventually things like rounded window corners, built-in transparency and (*shudder*) menu icons get added. If you like a bit of eye-candy then great, if you're like me, however, and would rather gouge your own eyes out with a spoon than waste cpu cycles on such frivolous nonsense, then maybe another WM is for you. Flux is however a solid WM, far lighter on resources than the Big Three (Gnome, KDE, XFCE4), and still retains some additional features like a panel and some eye-candy to make it a great choice for a first *box.

Openbox was originally a fork of the old blackbox code, but version 3 was written totally from scratch. It has been designed with lightness and simplicity in mind, providing a bare set of features that the devs decided were the minimum required for a good *box experience. It focuses on standards (EWMH and XML for example) and is slightly more limited in terms of theming than flux. It also does away with the panel that flux and blackbox have - if you want a panel, you'll have to use a third-party one. Suggestions include pypanel, fbpanel, and xfce4-panel. Openbox has an extremely flexible keybinding/mousebinding system. More minimal than flux, and personally I think it's more elegant - your mileage may vary.

Blackbox was the original of the three, development died out on it for a while but has recently started up again. I have never used blackbox for more than a few minutes, so unfortunately I can't give you any more info than that.

If you like a bit of eye-candy then great, if you're like me, however, and would rather gouge your own eyes out with a spoon than waste cpu cycles on such frivolous nonsense,

:rofl:

Actually, I just downloaded fluxbox and openbox. I am trying to force myself to learn "the way of the terminal." :p

Must... fight urge... for eyecandy!

I like and use Fluxbox myself. I just found KDE and Gnome to bloated, and like the looks of a customized Fluxbox. The hardest part of moving to a *box is learning to use a right-click menu (There is no start/whatever menu, nor is there any icons on the desktop.) Once you get past the minimalism and learn to edit the menu to your liking, and skin it a bit you can end up with something like I have:

box8tj.th.jpg

All it takes is a little hard work (IMO its worth it in system responsiveness). (Y)

... The hardest part of moving to a *box is learning to use a right-click menu ...

And the frustrating part for a *box user, is having to work on a Windows box, where you have to go to the bottom-left every time you want to do something new. :p

I rather like the middle-click anywhere on my desktop. I hate desktop icons (clutter). And, I have several keys bound to apps and tasks that I use frequently enough to not want to use the menus (volume upd/down/mute, lock screen, fbrun, konqueror, etc.).

And the frustrating part for a *box user, is having to work on a Windows box, where you have to go to the bottom-left every time you want to do something new. :p

I rather like the middle-click anywhere on my desktop. I hate desktop icons (clutter). And, I have several keys bound to apps and tasks that I use frequently enough to not want to use the menus (volume upd/down/mute, lock screen, fbrun, konqueror, etc.).

Yeah, I'm starting to get used to and like the minimalism. As for the shortcut keys, I like setting things up such as:

Winkey+T Opens a terminal window

Winkey+F Opens firefox

and so on. I still prefer using the menu most of the time though.

I really like that Fluxbox theme, bulio. Could you give me a link to it?

While I am at it, any recommendations for good theme sites?

Try the Freshmeat theme section.

As for the theme I use, its here

(Note: I use custom transparency settings, so adjust the window transparencies as you like)

:rofl:

Actually, I just downloaded fluxbox and openbox. I am trying to force myself to learn "the way of the terminal." :p

Must... fight urge... for eyecandy!

Well, my system is Debian, and if you use the Debian packages you automatically get a preset Debian menuset included! Well, it's actually Ubuntu but you get the picture!

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...

Edit: Sorry, I didn't realize this thread was 6 months old :/

Honestly I think that if there was a LiteStep for *nix that would just be perfect. I used to be a heavy LiteStep user (and skinner) but now I feel sort of out of place having to stick with XML. I use OpenBox, and I honestly really like it, but I hate that you can't use pixmaps for the menus and there isn't as much customizability as LiteStep.

I've been having trouble with Python and locale settings, so I can't use pypanel. I tried perlpanel, fbpanel, and fspanel but I ended up just using gnome-panel. I actually got it to look alright, it's just one bar set to not extend, at the bottom of the screen. I actually find it to be the best out of all of the panels.

I did some customization in OpenBox today, ended up with a pretty slick setup. Is there anything like sort of modules for OpenBox? Also, is there any way to *not* display the titles of the right click menu?

Edited by mynimal
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!