Windows XP won't boot after installing SATA HDD


Recommended Posts

Hi guys, I am having this strange problem.. here it goes!..

I bought a 300Gigs Seagate SATA HDD to add as a second hard drive (I already have an 80gigs IDE), installed it, drivers, everything.... so far so good, no problems at all.

Today I turn the computer on, BIOS recognizes the SATA hdd , then goes to boot windows... I get the windows logo with the progress bar moving.. after that, the screen goes black, i get a little of HDD activity and after 20 seconds the Windows logo apears with the blue screen behind (like when you get the users to sign in) bit instead of the user sign in screen, it says.... loading settings......... and it stays there FOREVER!!!.

If I go to the BIOS and disable the onboard sata, windows boots normally!!.

WTF is going on?!?!? How come this is happening!?!?!?. I really need help.

This is what I tried.....

Reinstalling sata drivers,

Changing cables.

Unplugging IDE devices.

And I think thats about it.

I have Windows XP pro SP2

AMD Athlon 3000+

Gigabyte GA7n400 Pro2 Motherboard

Any help would be appriciated!

Thanks in advance.

I forgot to say that it was working for a week with no problems!!

ok I'm scared now.. Just got 2x Seagate 250GB SATA the other day. have not put them in the system yet. anyone know of any bad things with the 2 that i have?

Seagate Barracuda 7200.8 Serial ATA

Model

ST3250823AS

Firmware

Drive 1: 3.04

Drive 2: 3.03

  dl0711 said:

ok I'm scared now.. Just got 2x Seagate 250GB SATA the other day. have not put them in the system yet. anyone know of any bad things with the 2 that i have?

Seagate Barracuda 7200.8 Serial ATA

Model

ST3250823AS

Firmware

Drive 1: 3.04

Drive 2: 3.03

Seagate Drives are reliable so don't be afraid. Everyone gets a dud at some point. BTW, I don't think SATA drivers are needed unless running RAID configurations. I haven't installed SATA drivers on the two PCs I own.

  r00tcracker said:

Hi denzilla, the problem is, that I was ALWAYS running XP of my IDE disk. I never installed XP on the SATA.

It worked for a week and then BOOM. Doesn't work anymore!!!!

My apologies as I misunderstood your post. Have you re-seated your SATA cables, or tried a different cable?

Yes, I did all that!..

The thing I noticed is when I installed it, i made it a Dynamic drive (i don't know if thats the problem).

The problem is with Windows I think, because when I boot the computer the drive works, but when it tries to start windows, it dies!.

There was ONE time that the computer booted and I went to the disk manager, and it showed the drive as OFFLINE... I tried to get it back on line, but I got a TIME OUT message and can't do anything.

The other thing is, when i tried reinstalling windows WITH the SATA drive connected, It wouldn't install either, I had the disable it from the bios to reinstall windows on my IDE drive!!

WIERD!!!

HELP!?

  r00tcracker said:

Yes, I did all that!..

The thing I noticed is when I installed it, i made it a Dynamic drive (i don't know if thats the problem).

The problem is with Windows I think, because when I boot the computer the drive works, but when it tries to start windows, it dies!.

There was ONE time that the computer booted and I went to the disk manager, and it showed the drive as OFFLINE... I tried to get it back on line, but I got a TIME OUT message and can't do anything.

The other thing is, when i tried reinstalling windows WITH the SATA drive connected, It wouldn't install either, I had the disable it from the bios to reinstall windows on my IDE drive!!

WIERD!!!

HELP!?

Any BIOS updates available for your board?

What Sata port do you have it plugged into? I'm not sure if its required to be in the first port but try plugging it into another port. If that doesn't work there are only three options:

1. OS is corrupt somehow.

2. SATA controller on motherboard is bad.

3. Hard Drive itself has failed in some way.

At least these are the only three I can think of. Could you take your HDD to a local repair shop and ask them to plu it into another PC to see if it can be accessed? Also, check MB manual and make sure the BIOS doesn't need to be configured to use SATA. If seatools says the drive is fine, I'm leaning toward the first two possibilities I listed.

You didn't happen to install BOTH type of power connectors to the SATA hard drive did you? Connecting both power connectors would be a bad thing! I did it the 1st time I installed a SATA hard drive, then was looking thru the manual later that day and saw the BIG warning not to do so, as it could very well cause the drive to go bad.

RottGutt, I don't understand what you are saying. I only have 1 power connector.

Djeso, I am not booting from the sata drive, the comptuter boots fine if I disable the SATA from the Bios.

denzilla, I connected the sata drive to both ports Sata0 and Sata1, nothing happened.

I will try to take it to a different computer.

Another thing, I donwloaded SLAX linux live CD and it Recognizes the drive!!!! But I can't copy my files from the SATA to the IDE. I can't even create folders on my IDE from linux.

Is that because I have NTFS partitions???

Thanks for all your answers!!!!

  r00tcracker said:

RottGutt, I don't understand what you are saying. I only have 1 power connector.

Djeso, I am not booting from the sata drive, the comptuter boots fine if I disable the SATA from the Bios.

denzilla, I connected the sata drive to both ports Sata0 and Sata1, nothing happened.

I will try to take it to a different computer.

Another thing, I donwloaded SLAX linux live CD and it Recognizes the drive!!!! But I can't copy my files from the SATA to the IDE. I can't even create folders on my IDE from linux.

Is that because I have NTFS partitions???

Thanks for all your answers!!!!

I don't know enough about linux to give you an answer on that but if you can browse the drive with linux but not copy, I guess it could be NTFS related. NTFS support isn't perfect on linux from what I've heard. Maybe try a different Live CD?

Well denzilla!!!..... Thanks for your help........... I am transfering my files from the SATA as we speak!!! Thanks to LINUX and Partition magic.

Now for the solution.

After reading on linux forums, i now know that Linux cannot write on NTFS partitions.

So, I had some free space on my IDE, created a FAT32 partition with Partition Magic 8 and its working now!! :)

After finishing this I will reformat the SATA and see what happens!!!!!

I will keep you informed anyway denzilla!

Thanks again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D

  r00tcracker said:

Well denzilla!!!..... Thanks for your help........... I am transfering my files from the SATA as we speak!!! Thanks to LINUX and Partition magic.

Now for the solution.

After reading on linux forums, i now know that Linux cannot write on NTFS partitions.

So, I had some free space on my IDE, created a FAT32 partition with Partition Magic 8 and its working now!! :)

After finishing this I will reformat the SATA and see what happens!!!!!

I will keep you informed anyway denzilla!

Thanks again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :D

Glad to hear you're able to recover your data :) In the future, I would setup your SATA to boot from and your IDE as storage since the SATA will give you faster performance in booting, gaming, etc.

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi I bought a SATA 80Gb drive and after buying a RAID controller card (as my computer is older) it worked fine as a second disk. Then I thought why not transfer the system to this disk as it is faster then the IDE my system is currently on? I did all this and made sure when installing Windows to use the option to install SATA drivers, by copying these from the system CD supplied with the 80 onto a floppy, then selecting them during install... Did you do this? Or is it not a system disk?

  denzilla said:

Seagate Drives are reliable so don't be afraid. Everyone gets a dud at some point. BTW, I don't think SATA drivers are needed unless running RAID configurations. I haven't installed SATA drivers on the two PCs I own.

I just built a system, and bought a sata drive, plugged it in and wham, worked with no problems, so i agree here

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • But you don't own a licence. You are essentially renting it and give it back when they decided to revoke it.
    • All set as AI did the trick
    • NOPE! Too expensive still.
    • AnyDesk 9.5.7 by Razvan Serea AnyDesk is a fast remote desktop system and enables users to access their data, images, videos and applications from anywhere and at any time, and also to share it with others. AnyDesk is the first remote desktop software that doesn't require you to think about what you can do. CAD, video editing or simply working comfortably with an office suite for hours are just a few examples. AnyDesk is designed for modern multi-core CPUs. Most of AnyDesk's image processing is done con­currently. This way, AnyDesk can utilize up to 90% of modern CPUs. AnyDesk works across multiple platforms and operating systems: Windows, Linux, Free BSD, Mac OS, iOS and Android. Just five megabytes - downloaded in a glimpse, sent via email, or fired up from your USB drive, AnyDesk will turn any desktop into your desktop in se­conds. No administrative privileges or installation needed. AnyDesk 9.5.7 changelog: Fixed Bugs Fixed deadlock when updating chat server Fixed crashes caused by exceptions in internal communication layer Fixed crash when opening new monitor in Session in a new window Fixed crash on shutdown Fixed bug that allowed naming Permission Profiles identical to predefined Profiles Fixed bug that could cause licensed remote clients to show up as free Fixed visual bug that caused Set-Password button to show up when Unattended Access was disabled Fixed bug that lead to selecting the wrong initial resolution for webcams New Features Added command line option --record-screen to start a Screen Recording Other Changes Improved visual consistency in some list views Download: AnyDesk 9.5.7 | macOS ~14.0 MB (Free for private use, paid upgrade available) Links: AnyDesk Home Page | Other platforms | Release History | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • WUT?! Tell us you've never built desktop software without telling us you've never built desktop software... The chromium rendering engine is the content-rendering engine for "chromium-based browsers," but that does NOT mean there's a full-on UI underneath that is somehow bloating these products. The bloat is from the additional UI components that the browser vendor (Vivaldi) is adding atop the base package. Most chromium browsers customize the default skin/theme of the overall package so there's absolutely zero added overhead; it's really just a different CSS-based theme pack. Vivaldi, however, adds more than just a different skin; they add built-in extensions (that are managed by other built-in extensions), add other customization modules, and all kinds of other bloat -- and these add-ons are EXACTLY where the resource-hogging stems from. The mere fact it's a chromium-based browser has no impact on the matter. Lastly, power users literally DO notice resource-intensive applications -- they'll even be familiar with tools and widgets that expose those measurements the way only a power-user would! General consumers, however, would simply remark that their rig is sluggish and probably outdated and blindly upgrade to whatever the salespeople are hawking at the local computer store. General consumers wouldn't even upgrade their existing computer cuz they wouldn't know how to!
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Celilo earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      K.I.S.S. earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      solidox earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      solidox earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Devesh Beri earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      444
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      166
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      151
    4. 4
      Nick H.
      66
    5. 5
      macoman
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!